Thursday, July 30, 2015

13 Issues Facing Native People Beyond Mascots And Casinos



13 Issues Facing Native People Beyond Mascots And Casinos

These are the problems you're not hearing enough about.

Headshot of Julian Brave NoiseCat
Julian Brave NoiseCat Native Issues Fellow, The Huffington Post

Posted: 07/30/2015 11:16 AM EDT
Most of the recent headlines about indigenous Americans have had to do with a certain D.C. football team, or a surpassingly dumb Adam Sandler movie, or casinos of the kind operated by the fictional Ugaya tribe on "House of Cards." And we're not saying these issues don't matter. But beyond the slot machines, the movie sets and the football fields, there are other problems facing Native communities -- insidious, systemic, life-or-death problems; the kinds of problems it takes years and votes and marches to resolve -- that aren't getting nearly as much attention.
There are 567 tribes, including 229 Alaska Native communities, currently recognized by the federal government. The Bureau of Indian Affairs -- the primary federal agency in charge of relations with indigenous communities -- is also considering extending federal status to Native Hawaiians.
Each of the federally recognized tribes is a nation unto itself -- sovereign, self-determining and self-governing -- that maintains a government-to-government relationship with the United States. In addition, the rights of all indigenous peoples, including Native Hawaiians, have been affirmed in a 2007 United Nations declaration. Each indigenous nation has a distinct history, language and culture. While many face concerns that are specific to their government, state, or region, there are certain issues that affect all Native communities throughout the United States -- from Hawaii to Maine, and Alaska to Florida. Here are 13 such issues that you probably aren't hearing enough about.

Native Americans face issues of mass incarceration and policing.

Thanks in large part to the Black Lives Matter movement, which has insisted that demands for justice and equality for the black community remain part of the national conversation, there is now growing momentum to address the issues of policing and mass incarceration. But while the brutalization of black Americans at the hands of police, and their maltreatment within the criminal justice system, have garnered national headlines, similar injustices against Native Americans have gone largely unreported.
Earlier this month, Paul Castaway, a mentally ill Rosebud Sioux tribal citizen, was shot and killed by Denver police. His death led to protests in the Denver Native community, and has shed light on the shocking rate at which police kill Native Americans -- who account for less than 1 percent of the national population, but who make up nearly 2 percent of all police killings, according to data compiled by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Native peoples are also disproportionately affected by mass incarceration. In states with significant Native populations, Native Americans are wildly overrepresented in the criminal justice system. In South Dakota, for example, Native Americans make up 9 percent of the total population, but 29 percent of the prison population. In Alaska, Native people account for 15 percent of the total population and 38 percent of the prison population. And Native Hawaiians are only 10 percent of the state's population, but 39 percent of the incarcerated population.
The issue of mass incarceration in Native communities is complicated by overlapping and unresolved conflicts between tribal, federal and state jurisdictions. If a crime is thought to have occurred on a Native reservation or within a Native community, it's not always clear which agency is going to be in charge of prosecution. That's determined by a complex set of factors, including the severity of the charges and the races of the victims and alleged perpetrators. The overlapping jurisdictions of federal and tribal sovereignty also mean that Indians who commit crimes on tribal lands can be punished twice for the same offense: once under federal jurisdiction and again in tribal court. Lastly, aside from cases of domestic violence, tribal courts are not allowed to try major crimes as defined under the Major Crimes Act. This means that suspects in most felony cases are prosecuted in federal courts, where sentencing tends to be more severe.
In February, building off the momentum of Black Lives Matter, the Lakota Peoples’ Law Project released its "Native Lives Matter" report, which gives an overview of the inequities faced by Native Americans in the criminal justice system. The report, like the voices of Native peoples in general, has been largely ignored in the growing national conversation about policing and criminal justice reform.

Native communities are often impoverished and jobless.

Native peoples suffer from high rates of poverty and unemployment. Seventeen percent of Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders and 27 percent of all self-identified Native Americans and Alaska Natives live in poverty, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.
However, the national figure distorts the prevalence of poverty on Indian reservations and in Alaska Native communities, where 22 percent of Native people live. In 2012, three of the five poorest counties in the U.S., and five of the top 10, encompassed Sioux reservations in North and South Dakota.
Last year, President Barack Obama visited the Standing Rock Sioux on the border of North and South Dakota, where the poverty rate is 43.2 percent -- almost three times the national average. The unemployment rate on the Standing Rock Reservation was over 60 percent as of 2014.

The federal government is still stripping Native people of their land.

The U.S. was built on land taken from Indian nations, and indigenous peoples across the country are still living with the reality of dispossession. Right now, members of the San Carlos Apache Nation in Arizona are fighting the sale of their sacred Oak Flat site to foreign mining conglomerates.
The Kanaka Maoli in Hawaii are fighting to protect their sacred mountain Mauna Kea from the construction of a 30-meter, $1.4 billion telescope. Many Hawaiians are now questioning the legality of the state's annexation, which took place after a group of business interests, most of them American, overthrew of the Kingdom of Hawaii in 1893.
And in the heartland, the Great Sioux Nation has refused a $1.3 billion settlement as payment for the government’s illegal seizure of their sacred Black Hills in South Dakota in 1877. The faces of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt are etched into the Black Hills at Mount Rushmore.

Exploitation of natural resources threatens Native communities.

Throughout the history of North American settlement, the territorial dispossession of indigenous peoples has gone hand in hand with natural resource exploitation. In the 1800s, Indian nations in the West clashed with miners pouring into their territories in search of gold.
Today, from the Bakken formation in North Dakota to the Tar Sands in northeastern Alberta, Canada, Indian nations often stand on the front lines of opposition to hydraulic fracturing and pipelines that pump oil out of indigenous communities -- violating treaty rights, threatening the environment and contributing to climate change in the process.
Other groups, however, such as the Ute Tribe in Utah and the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation in North Dakota, have tried to make the most out of the economic opportunities presented by oil and natural gas extraction. For the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation, the rush to cash in on oil has resulted in a mess of inadequate regulation and corruption -- including allegations of murder for hire.

Violence against women and children is especially prevalent in Native communities.

Native American communities -- and particularly Native women and children -- suffer from an epidemic of violence. Native women are 3.5 times more likely to be raped or sexually assaulted in their life than women of other races. Twenty-two percent of Native children suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder -- a rate of PTSD equal to that found among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.
Often, this violence comes from outside the community. The nonprofit Mending the Sacred Hoop, citing 1990s data from the CDC and the Department of Justice, reports that "over 80% of violence experienced by Native Americans is committed by persons not of the same race," a rate "substantially higher than for whites or blacks."
However, some progress has been made. This year, despite staunch GOP opposition, tribes won the right to prosecute non-Native men who commit crimes of domestic violence or dating violence or who violate orders of protection against Native women on Indian reservations. Tribes have continued to push for control over justice systems on sovereign Indian land, in spite of resistance from state, local and federal lawmakers and law enforcement authorities.

The education system is failing Native students.

Only 51 percent of Native Americans in the class of 2010 graduated high school. Native Hawaiians fare better, but still underperform compared to their peers -- as best we can tell from the limited data, anyway. In the mid-'00s, about 70 percent of Native Hawaiians attending Hawaiian public schools graduated in four years, as compared to 78 percent of students statewide.
For Native Americans, at least, these disparities are in large part the result of inadequate federal funding, to the point where some schools on Indian reservations are deteriorated and structurally dangerous.

Native families live in overcrowded, poor-quality housing.

Forty percent of Native Americans who live on reservations are in substandard housing. One-third of homes are overcrowded, and less than 16 percent have indoor plumbing. Housing on reservations is funded by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and administered and augmented by tribes, and has been historically underfunded, despite treaties and the trust responsibility of the federal government.

Native patients receive inadequate health care.

Native Americans, Alaska Natives and Native Hawaiians face massive disparities in health as compared to the general population, suffering from high rates of diabetes, obesity, substance abuse and HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.
Although Native Americans and Alaska Natives are eligible to receive health care through Indian Health Services, nearly one in three are uninsured. Like many other federal agencies that serve Native people, IHS has historically been underfunded. Local IHS facilities often lack basic services like emergency contraception, in some cases forcing Native patients to travel hundreds of miles for treatment elsewhere.

There's a dearth of capital and financial institutions in Native communities.

Indian nations do not own their reservation lands. Rather, the lands are held in trust by the federal government. This prevents Native Americans who live on reservations from leveraging their assets for loans, making it difficult for them to start businesses or promote economic growth in the area.
Compounding this problem, 14.5 percent of Native Americans are unbanked, and therefore lack the basic financial resources needed for economic prosperity.

Native Americans have the right to vote... but that's not always enough.

Native Americans and Alaska Natives are often unable to vote because there are no polling places anywhere near them. Some communities, such as the Duck Valley Reservation in Nevada and the Goshute Reservation in Utah, are located more than 100 miles from the nearest polling place.
These problems are compounded by high rates of illiteracy in some rural Native communities, such as the Yup’ik in Alaska, who primarily speak and read their native language because public education was not available in their region until the 1980s.

There is an epidemic of youth suicide in Native communities.

Suicide is the second most common cause of death for Native youth ages 15 to 24 -- two and a half times the national rate for that age group. In February, following a rash of suicides, the Oglala Lakota Nation in South Dakota declared a state of emergency.

Native languages are dying, and the U.S. government is doing little to help.

Native languages are struggling to survive in the United States, with 130 "at risk," according to UNESCO, and another 74 "critically endangered." While some communities, such as the Native Hawaiians, the Anishinaabe and the Navajo, have had success preserving and revitalizing their languages, Native communities face obstacles from the testing and curriculum requirements of No Child Left Behind. And educators who want to teach young people about Native languages and cultures have to contend with a general lack of funding and resources.

Many Native communities do not have their rights recognized by the federal government.

Native Hawaiians, and members of many other Native communities throughout the U.S., have never received federal recognition of their rights as Native peoples. This deprives them of basic services, and even of the limited rights of self-governance available to other Native communities. Many tribes spend decades wading through Bureau of Indian Affairs paperwork, only to lose their petitions for recognition.
Recently, however, the Obama administration announced that it would be streamlining the federal recognition process, making it easier for unrecognized Indian nations to secure their rights under the law.
Need help? In the U.S., call 1-800-273-8255 for the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline.

Thursday, July 23, 2015

Wherever You Are


Wherever You Are
July 19, 2015
Written by Kathryn Matthews (Huey)
Sunday, July 19
Eighth Sunday after Pentecost

Focus Theme
Wherever You Are
Weekly Prayer
Holy God of Israel, ever present and moving among your people, draw us near you, that in place of hostility there may be peace; in place of loneliness, compassion; in place of aimlessness, direction; and in place of sickness, healing; through Christ Jesus, in whom you draw near to us. Amen.
Focus Scripture
2 Samuel 7:1-14a
Now when the king was settled in his house, and the Lord had given him rest from all his enemies around him, the king said to the prophet Nathan, "See now, I am living in a house of cedar, but the ark of God stays in a tent." Nathan said to the king, "Go, do all that you have in mind; for the Lord is with you."
But that same night the word of the Lord came to Nathan: Go and tell my servant David: Thus says the Lord: Are you the one to build me a house to live in? I have not lived in a house since the day I brought up the people of Israel from Egypt to this day, but I have been moving about in a tent and a tabernacle. Wherever I have moved about among all the people of Israel, did I ever speak a word with any of the tribal leaders of Israel, whom I commanded to shepherd my people Israel, saying, "Why have you not built me a house of cedar?" Now therefore thus you shall say to my servant David: Thus says the Lord of hosts: I took you from the pasture, from following the sheep to be prince over my people Israel; and I have been with you wherever you went, and have cut off all your enemies from before you; and I will make for you a great name, like the name of the great ones of the earth. And I will appoint a place for my people Israel and will plant them, so that they may live in their own place, and be disturbed no more; and evildoers shall afflict them no more, as formerly, from the time that I appointed judges over my people Israel; and I will give you rest from all your enemies. Moreover the Lord declares to you that the Lord will make you a house. When your days are fulfilled and you lie down with your ancestors, I will raise up your offspring after you, who shall come forth from your body, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. I will be a father to him, and he shall be a son to me.
All Readings For This Sunday
2 Samuel 7:1-14a with Psalm 89:20-37 or
Jeremiah 23:1-6 with Psalm 23
Ephesians 2:11-22
Mark 6:30-34, 53-56
Focus Questions
1. What is the long journey that your church has taken; from where did you come, and where are you now? How have you sensed God's presence with you along the way?
2. What is the "foundation" of your church?
3. What vestiges endure today of the claims made by ancient rulers who assumed God's approval for their actions?
4. Who are the people who may be effectively kept out by the walls of your church, both physical and metaphorical?
5. How does a church (a house, a people) stay mobile when it's closely identified with massive, solid structures?
Reflection by Kate Matthews (Huey)
David's journey has been long and difficult, from pasture to palace, from shepherd boy to prince, from persistent warrior to powerful king whose reign promises peace for the people at last, peace, and a place of their own. However long and however difficult the journey, David must have sensed God's presence and approval with him every step of the way, wherever he was. How else would a youngest son, a shepherd, rise to such heights? He must have felt very, very special, for God had obviously set him apart, chosen him from among many, anointed him with power and promise. Now David, King of Israel by the grace of God, sits safely enthroned in Jerusalem and comfortable in a house of his own. And he finally has time to compare his beautiful cedar home with the tent that has sheltered the ark of God. The ark represented the presence of God among the people, and David realizes, or rather, decides, that God deserves a house, too. No doubt, a splendid house and home for the presence of God in their midst.
Don't they say that "We make plans, and God laughs"? Onto the scene for the first time in the story strides the prophet Nathan, whose name may be familiar to us because of the later, perhaps more cinematic, story about David and Uriah the Hittite and his wife Bathsheba. Remember "You are the man!" in 12:7a? David may have been great, but he certainly wasn't perfect, and his sin in stealing Uriah's wife (and even sending Uriah to a certain death) is a grave and memorable mark on his record. No wonder a figure this great needs to stay in close communication with God, for the power to do "big" things also provides the opportunity to sin "big." It's curious that David communicates here with God through a prophet, while only a chapter or so earlier he seems to be able to speak directly with God: "When David inquired of the Lord, he saidÖ" (5:23a). Perhaps a prophet was the messenger then, too, but it is a small and interesting difference in the way the story's told.
God, through the prophet Nathan, responds to David's construction plans by asking, "Hey! Did you hear me complaining about living in a tent? No, I prefer being mobile, flexible, responsive, free to move about, not fixed in one place." God then turns the tables on David and says, "You think you're going to build me a house? No, no, no, no. I'M going to build YOU a house. A house that will last much longer and be much greater than anything you could build yourself with wood and stone. A house that will shelter the hopes and dreams of your people long after 'you lie down with your ancestors.'" God promises to establish David and his line "forever," and this is a "no matter what" promise, even if the descendants of David sin, even if "evildoers" threaten.
God the punster
God turns the tables on David and uses, of all things, a pun to do so, using "house" to mean more than one thing. This is a very important moment, a golden moment in David's life but also in the story of Israel and, theologically, in our lives, too. Walter Brueggemann says that this story provides us a way to "imagine David having established himself." A people who understood themselves as living in covenant with God now received, James Newsome writes, "a new covenant," a better, a renewed or newly reconfigured version of the covenant their ancient ancestors had received. This was validation for David and an endorsement both political and theological; if you weren't "for" - and obedient to - David and his heirs, you weren't just a bad citizen, you were both "rebellious and apostate." The concept of the separation of "church" and state is irrelevant here, of course, but we have to recognize that lens through which we might read this text.
So God's approval is not only upon David but upon his descendants, and even when one of his offspring strays, or "commits iniquity" (v. 14b: the lectionary passage stops just before this part), God will punish him, but will not "take my steadfast love from himÖ." There are at least two important points to examine here. Patricia Dutcher-Walls agrees that this text asserts that God established the line of David but she expands on the significance of the validation being extended to David's descendants, instead of "special" individuals being chosen and anointed in each generation, as David had been. Instead of hearing "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me" as a mark of God's choosing, this is a dynastic approach to choosing a ruler, Dutcher-Walls writes, one who is "designated not by God but...by the will and political power of the previous king and his advisors [who] choose a successor among his sons." Anyone reading the stories of David's successors knows how well that worked out.
I majored in English history, and I remember well the perils of a hereditary monarchy: you could never be sure that the next person in line was really qualified for or worthy of the power and responsibility of the throne. Once enthroned, kings (like David himself) often made mistakes and even sinned greatly. It must have been helpful to monarchs to be able to turn to this passage for "no matter what" validation of their rule. However, there are conflicting understandings of how God works in this situation; Dutcher-Walls observes that there are many times in the Bible when the people are warned that they still have to keep the commandments in order to "live a blessed life as God indeed intends for humanity." If we stay with the story long enough, we'll have the opportunity to hear about occasions where the rulers of God's people misunderstand the meaning of this assurance and assume that God blesses whatever they do. It seems to me that, as our theme reminds us, God's presence is indeed always with us, wherever we are, but assuming God's blessing upon our every idea and desire is something quite different.
Using God for validation
In ancient times and for many centuries thereafter, religion has been used to justify and validate the actions and indeed the reign of many a ruler of empires and nations (remember the "divine right" of kings in European history?). Such confidence may explain, then, why David later thought he could not only take Bathsheba for his own but also arrange to have her husband fall in battle. He may have thought, on some level, that he was "golden." What are the vestiges of such claims of God's approval that endure today? Do they come with a "no matter what" clause, or do they include the condition of keeping the commandments, in order to "live a blessed life as God indeed intends for humanity"?
Dutcher-Walls uses the phrase "the common but dangerous assumption" to describe the notion of God's unconditional approval for a leader but also the belief "that God's presence is automatically assured to any particular place." Are there such places in your own life, where you are sure God is "more present" than others? Do we, as a community, assume that God is somehow more present in a church than in the world beyond its walls? What sort of power does a church building have in the minds of both members and the people on the outside of its walls?
Belonging to the household of Christ
The reading from 2 Samuel goes very nicely with the Epistle reading from Ephesians (2:11-22) if we think about the power and promises of God to build us a house of our own, a dwelling place of peace and reconciliation. Just as the victory and security and unity at last of the people of Israel are amazing, so is the vision of bringing together Gentiles and Jews, the uncircumcised and the circumcised, across a barrier that seems not so important to us today but was nevertheless formidable in that day. Strangers and aliens become citizens with the saints when they come home to the house that God builds in Christ, whose cross, Matthew L. Skinner observes, trumps "the law's ability to make qualitative appraisals between different kinds of people." We too become with them members of a household built on a cornerstone who is the fulfillment of God's promise of peace, healing and reconciliation.
The Gospel reading from Mark (6:30-34, 53-56) illustrates just what this cornerstone is about, drawing great crowds of desperate people to himself, people hungry for healing, for food, for forgiveness, for hope. In Christ, the dividing walls that we have built (instead of a sacred dwelling place for God!) are torn down, all of our paltry attempts to build barriers falling short of God's power to create community not out of stone and wood, gold and silver, stained glass and soaring ceilings, but out of people and the promise that shapes them into a community that says yes to the call to follow Jesus, to love one another and the world. Can you imagine the Stillspeaking God promising to build us a house? Do we really think it would be made of glass and stone and wood, like our church buildings, or would it be something different, something more, something lasting?
Strangers and aliens no more
In our United Church of Christ congregations, strangers and aliens become sisters and brothers because of no-matter-what promises we make to one another. People who are very different from one another, whose differences matter in other settings but make no difference in the church, come together and are joined together by the power of God into a household, a "whole structure joined together," growing into a holy temple. If we think about the ark of the covenant, God's dwelling place in the 2 Samuel passage, being mobile and moving about among the people, we may find a better way to think of the church than just buildings. (The Rev. Otis Moss III makes this point beautifully in his interview http://www.ucc.org/vitality/ready-set-grow/video/otis-moss.html on ucc.org, about "iPod theology" that is on the move: "How to reach new generations".) No matter how beautiful and sacred the space of our churches may be, the church is the people, the Spirit moving among us, the community sent just as much as the community gathered. Remember our reading from Mark's Gospel (6:1-13) only two weeks ago, with the theme, "Sent with Power"? It's ironic that the imagery of cornerstones, structures, and foundations are so familiar and yet all sound rather heavy for a people on the move, a people sent into the world beyond their walls to share the good news.
The call to peace also has implications for our life beyond the walls of our churches, for our public life in which we have the opportunity and obligation to make sure that all of God's children share in the goods that God has so abundantly provided in creation. In today's world, that means health care and a social safety net, protection for children and the vulnerable, like the widows, orphans, and strangers so long ago. It means good schools and care for the elderly, nourishing food and clean water for all, not just some, clean air and unpolluted land not just for us but for those far away and for the generations who will follow us. It means money for building up instead of money for tearing down and destroying, money for peace and plowshares instead of wasting our precious resources on armaments and war. It means vows, pledges, promises to save lives rather than destroy them. It means that God's house is all of creation and all of it is sacred, that God's place is shared with us but not owned by us, that God's law requires us to recognize and honor the image of God dwelling within each one of us. Rather than presuming that God approves of our political systems, it would be a good thing to look at our public life and wonder if God approves of our systems of sharing and our approach to justice.
Within the walls, and beyond
Would God approve of the house we have built for one another, for the whole community to live in? This is just as much the stuff of religion as it is of politics: "In David, God risks the dangers of ideological manipulation of faith for the sake of bringing the grace of divine promise into close engagement with public and political realities. The church," Bruce Birch writes, "can do no less." What walls have come down in your personal life, in the greater community and the world? Who or what in your church decides who is the insider, and who is the stranger and the alien? Does your congregation make a connection between what happens within the walls of your church and what happens beyond them?
The Rev. Kathryn Matthews (Huey) serves as dean of Amistad Chapel at the national offices of the United Church of Christ in Cleveland, Ohio (https://www.facebook.com/AmistadChapel).
You're invited to share your reflections on this text on our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/SermonSeeds.
A preaching version of this reflection (with book titles) is at http://www.ucc.org/worship_samuel_sermon_seeds_july_19_2015.
For further reflection
Abraham Lincoln, 19th century
"[People] are not flattered by being shown that there has been a difference of purpose between the Almighty and them."
Robert Browning, 19th century
"Earth changes, but thy soul and God stand sure."
Jean Anouilh, 20th century
"Everyone thinks God is on their side. The rich and powerful know that God is."
Thich Nhat Hanh, 21st century
"Your true home is in the here and the now."
George MacDonald, 19th century
"Doing the will of God leaves me no time for disputing about [God's] plans."
John Ortberg, Jr., 21st century
"The goal of prayer is to live all of my life and speak all of my words in the joyful awareness of the presence of God."

About Weekly Seeds
Weekly Seeds is a United Church of Christ resource for Bible study based on the readings of the "Lectionary," a plan for weekly Bible readings in public worship used in Protestant, Anglican and Roman Catholic churches throughout the world. When we pray with and study the Bible using the Lectionary, we are praying and studying with millions of others.
You're welcome to use this resource in your congregation's Bible study groups.
Weekly Seeds is a service of Local Church Ministries of the United Church of Christ. Bible texts are from the New Revised Standard Version, © 1989 Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Prayer is from The Revised Common Lectionary ©1992 Consultation on Common Texts. Used by permission.

Ulysses S. Grant




Ulysses S. Grant Died 130 Years Ago. Racists Hate Him, But Historians No Longer Do.

Why everything your teacher told you about the Union general and U.S. president was wrong.

Nick Baumann Senior Enterprise Editor, The Huffington Post
Posted: 07/23/2015
After Ulysses S. Grant, the 18th president of the United States, died 130 years ago today, a million and a half Americans watched his funeral procession. His mausoleum was a popular tourist attraction in New York City for decades. But for most of the 20th Century, historians and non-historians alike believed Grant was corrupt, drunken and incompetent, that he was one of the country's worst presidents, and that as a general, he was more lucky than good. 
A generation of historians, led by Columbia's William A. Dunning, criticized Grant for backing Reconstruction, the federal government's attempt to protect the rights of black southerners in the 1860s and early 1870s. Black people, some Dunning school historians suggested, were unsuited for education, the vote, or holding office. Grant's critics were "determined the Civil War would be interpreted from the point of view of the Confederacy," said John F. Marszalek, a historian and executive director of the Ulysses S. Grant Association. "The idea that Grant would do things that would ensure citizenship rights for blacks was just awful and so he had to be knocked down." 
Grant's "presidency was basically seen as corrupt, and it took place during Reconstruction, which was seen as basically the lowest point of American history," said Eric Foner, a civil war historian at Columbia University. "Whatever Grant did to protect former slaves was naïveté or worse."
In recent decades, that's all changed. The Grant you learned about in school isn't the one your kids will read about in their textbooks. And that's because historians are in the midst of a broad reassessment of Grant's legacy. In just nine years, between 2000 and 2009, Grant jumped 10 spots in a C-SPAN survey of historians' presidential rankings, from 33rd to 23rd -- a bigger jump than any other president. His reputation as a military leader has risen, too. 
"Public opinion is behind what historians are saying about Grant," Marszalek said. "Too many people in the public hold the old Lost Cause view that Grant was this butcher and incompetent and corrupt and a drunkard, which wasn’t true."
One of the reasons for the change in Grant's reputation is an increasing acceptance among historians that Reconstruction pursued worthy goals.
"We now view Reconstruction ... as something that should have succeeded in securing equality for African-Americans, and we see Grant as supportive of that effort and doing as much as any person could do to try to secure that within realm of political reality," said Brooks Simpson, a historian at Arizona State University. "We see him as on the right side of history."
You have to go almost to Lyndon Johnson to find a president who tried to do as much to ensure black people found freedom. John F. Marszalek
Many historians now point to Grant's decision to send U.S. troops into South Carolina to crush the Ku Klux Klan as particularly praiseworthy, Foner said. 
"You have to go almost to Lyndon Johnson to find a president who tried to do as much to ensure black people found freedom," Marszalek said. 
Grant also suffered because of inevitable comparisons with Robert E. Lee, the Confederate general. He was accused of running a "war of attrition" that required "no real military talent," Foner explained. But "as those older views have abandoned, Grant's reputation has risen, especially among military historians."
Grant is now praised for having a strategic view of the war, rather than focusing solely on the area around Virginia, as Lee so often did. And he gets credit for believing in civilian control of the military. When some of his officers were upset about black soldiers serving in the Union Army, Grant "said, 'Look, this is the policy of the government, and the Army has to carry it out. ... If there's anyone who can't deal with it, resign right now,'" Foner said. 
Foner also thinks increased praise for Grant's memoirs has boosted the president's reputation. Simpson doesn't buy that, noting that famed literary critic Edmund Wilson was praising Grant's memoirs as a "unique expression of the national character" in the 1960s, when Grant's reputation as a president was at its nadir.
As the Confederacy's reputation rises or falls, Grant's rises or falls in the opposite direction. Eric Foner
The big question now is whether public opinion will follow that of historians. Simpson thinks the shift is starting, noting that Grant is now portrayed more favorably in high school and college textbooks and television documentaries. His memorial in Washington and his tomb in New York have been repaired since the 1980s. And he's been shown in a positive light in popular media, including the 1999 Will Smith vehicle "Wild Wild West," in which he was played by Kevin Kline. On Wednesday, Rick Perry -- the governor of a state that fought against Grant in the Civil War -- praised the Union general in a speech, saying he had "come to symbolize the healing of our nation campaigning under the banner, 'let us have peace.'" 
"We’re always re-evaluating past historical figures in light of present events, and those changes take a lot of time to fix themselves in the public mind," Simpson said.
Perhaps the best way to track Grant's popularity will be monitoring the image of his foes.
"As the Confederacy's reputation rises or falls, Grant's rises or falls in the opposite direction," Foner said.
"As we get more critical of Robert E. Lee and the Confederacy, Grant's reputation is going to go up," Simpson agreed. "Grant's reputation says as much about us as it does about his time, because it's about what we value." 

Saturday, July 18, 2015

God's Abundant Presence


God's Abundant Presence

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
The Rev. Kathryn Matthews Huey serves as Dean of the Amistad Chapel at the Church House in Cleveland.

Weekly Prayer
In your compassionate love, O God, you nourish us with the words of life and bread of blessing. Grant that Jesus may calm our fears and move our hearts to praise your goodness by sharing our bread with others. Amen.

Focus Scripture
John 6:1-21

After this Jesus went to the other side of the Sea of Galilee, also called the Sea of Tiberias. A large crowd kept following him, because they saw the signs that he was doing for the sick. Jesus went up the mountain and sat down there with his disciples. Now the Passover, the festival of the Jews, was near. When he looked up and saw a large crowd coming toward him, Jesus said to Philip, "Where are we to buy bread for these people to eat?" He said this to test him, for he himself knew what he was going to do. Philip answered him, "Six months' wages would not buy enough bread for each of them to get a little." One of his disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter's brother, said to him, "There is a boy here who has five barley loaves and two fish. But what are they among so many people?" Jesus said, "Make the people sit down." Now there was a great deal of grass in the place; so they sat down, about five thousand in all. Then Jesus took the loaves, and when he had given thanks, he distributed them to those who were seated; so also the fish, as much as they wanted. When they were satisfied, he told his disciples, "Gather up the fragments left over, so that nothing may be lost." So they gathered them up, and from the fragments of the five barley loaves, left by those who had eaten, they filled twelve baskets. When the people saw the sign that he had done, they began to say, "This is indeed the prophet who is to come into the world."

When Jesus realized that they were about to come and take him by force to make him king, he withdrew again to the mountain by himself. When evening came, his disciples went down to the sea, got into a boat, and started across the sea to Capernaum. It was now dark, and Jesus had not yet come to them. The sea became rough because a strong wind was blowing. When they had rowed about three or four miles, they saw Jesus walking on the sea and coming near the boat, and they were terrified. But he said to them, "It is I; do not be afraid." Then they wanted to take him into the boat, and immediately the boat reached the land toward which they were going.

Reflection by Kate Matthews (Huey)

It's tempting to read this story from the Gospel of John as one more example of Jesus' compassion, with a note of communion added in, when Jesus takes the bread, gives thanks, and distributes it to the hungry crowd. We would be missing so much, however, because we read from the weekly lectionary in short passages, missing the setting and the progression to what comes afterward (or from what came earlier). Yes, compassion and communion are found in these stories, but there is so much more. While Jesus' heart is touched by the hunger of the crowd, John is teaching us about the power of God in Jesus, about who Jesus is. Of course, we learn who Jesus is by what he does (isn't that true of everyone--don't actions speak even louder than words?), but John's powerful discourses by Jesus are not free-floating. The words Jesus said connect to these stories about what Jesus did. And so we have the disciples, down-to-earth (even up on a mountain) and overwhelmed by the crowd, computing the cost of feeding so many people. "Impossible!" they say, but we know that all things are possible with God, so this story is just as much, if not more, about the power of God in Jesus as it is about Jesus' compassion for the hungry crowd. Indeed, God's power is "far more than all we can ask or imagine," just as we read in Ephesians 3:20b.

For Further Reflection

C.S. Lewis, 20th century
"Miracles are a retelling in small letters of the very same story which is written across the whole world in letters too large for some of us to see."

Chinese Proverb
"The miracle is not to fly in the air, or to walk on the water; but to walk on the earth."

Sue Monk Kidd, 21st century
"I realized it for the first time in my life: there is nothing but mystery in the world, how it hides behind the fabric of our poor, browbeat days, shining brightly, and we don't even know it."

Ralph Waldo Emerson, 19th century
"The invariable mark of wisdom is to see the miraculous in the common."

Walt Whitman, 19th century
"Every moment of light and dark is a miracle."

Monday, July 13, 2015

PANAMERICAN INSTITUTE-Adopt-A-Student Program


PANAMERICAN INSTITUTE
CALIFORNIA, U.S.A. TAX EXEMPT CORPORATION NUMBER: C0513871
IN MEXICO:                                          U.S.A. MAILING ADDRESS:
    MAR HUDSON 5204, COL. ALEMÁN            P. O. BOX 433872, SAN YSIDRO, CA  92143

  TIJUANA, B. C. MÉXICO TEL: 680-5950            PHONE FROM U.S.A. 011-52-664-680-5950

Vist us at paischool.org

Adopt-A-Student Program

You can sponsor a student for as little as $35 per month or $420 per year.
Thanks to this Program, attendance at Panamerican Institute has been higher, and the number of students completing the three-year Educational Program has increased.

  • Students adopted are given one free daily meal and, as needed, help for transportation or school supplies.
  • An account for each adopted student is set up to show income and expenses. This information is available to adopter upon request.
  • Adopter shall receive a picture, biographical sketch of supported student and school progress reports.
  • Adopter shall be placed on Panamerican Institute mailing list for newsletters and other informational materials.


STUDENT REQUIREMENTS


Maintain satisfactory grades and show good citizenship.

Write at least three letters to adopter each school year.




ADOPTER’S PLEDGE


Send support as agreed.

Adopter is encouraged to visit the Institute to become better acquainted with student and with the school.


---------------------------------------------CLIP HERE-----------------------------------------------

MAIL THIS FORM AND ADOPTER CHECK TO PANAMERICAN INSTITUTE
P. O. BOX 433872, SAN YSIDRO, CA. 92143

It is my (our) desire to adopt _____ student(s) for ____ school year(s) at $35 per month or $420 per year.
I wish to pay $35 (     ) monthly, $105 (     ) quarterly, $210 (     ) by semester, $420 (     ) annually.

First check is enclosed.

Name:_______________________________________________________________________________

Address:_____________________________________________________________________________

City, State & Zip Code_________________________________________________________________

Phone:__________________________E-Mail:______________________________________________

Thursday, July 9, 2015

America's Best Muslim Comedians To Star In First-Ever Muslim Funny Fest

America's Best Muslim Comedians To Star In First-Ever Muslim Funny Fest

What do Muslims in America have to laugh about?
Quite a lot, say the organizers of New York City’s -- and possibly America’s -- first-ever Muslim stand-up comedy festival.
The Muslim Funny Fest, slated to take place between July 21 and 23, will bring 14 Muslim entertainers together for a bit of comic relief.
Dean Obeidallah and Maysoon Zayid, the two comedians co-producing the event, have been putting together the New York Arab American Comedy Festival for the past 11 years. But this year, they felt it was important to rally around the shared experience of growing up Muslim in America, and use comedy to process that experience.
"Even though all the comedians are Muslims, we all have very different experiences, whether it is the culture we grew up in or the extent to which we practice our faith," Zayid told The Huffington Post. "The common link that, sadly, brings us together is the bigotry and hatred we are currently experiencing as American Muslims, and I am hoping that the Muslim Funny Fest will do something to dilute that hate."
American attitudes toward Muslims have taken a turn for the worse in recent years.
In 2010, close to half of Muslim-Americans said they’d experienced some form of personal racial or religious discrimination. And Muslims are viewed more coldly than any other major religious group in the country, according to a 2014 Pew Research Center poll.
"The United States is scared of two things: black people and Muslims," comedian Preacher Moss says in a trailer for the fest. "I've got the best of both worlds."
The festival will feature stars like Negin Farsad, a producer, actor and social justice activist, "Mo" Amer, who was part of the comedy tour "Allah Made Me Funny," and Azhar Usman, a former attorney who has performed stand-up on five continents.
Obeidallah said that one of his biggest hopes for the festival is that the audience is diverse and that it includes non-Muslims of many faiths and backgrounds.
"We felt really strongly the need to show people that Muslims can be funny, that we have a sense of humor, and most importantly, that we can laugh at ourselves," he said

Pope Apologizes For Catholic Church's 'Offenses' Against Indigenous Peoples



·  · 
Pope Apologizes For Catholic Church's 'Offenses' Against Indigenous Peoples
"I humbly ask forgiveness...for crimes committed against the native peoples during the so-called conquest of America."
Associated Press
By Nicole Winfield, Jacobo Garcia
Posted: 07/09/2015 | Edited: 2 hours ago

SANTA CRUZ, Bolivia (AP) — Pope Francis apologized Thursday for the sins and "offenses" committed by the Catholic Church against indigenous peoples during the colonial-era conquest of the Americas.
History's first Latin American pope "humbly" begged forgiveness during an encounter in Bolivia with indigenous groups and other activists and in the presence of Bolivia's first-ever indigenous president, Evo Morales.
Francis noted that Latin American church leaders in the past had acknowledged "grave sins were committed against the native peoples of America in the name of God." St. John Paul II, for his part, apologized to the continent's indigenous for the "pain and suffering" caused during the 500 years of the church's presence on the continent during a 1992 visit to the Dominican Republic.
But Francis went farther.
"I humbly ask forgiveness, not only for the offenses of the church herself, but also for crimes committed against the native peoples during the so-called conquest of America," he said to applause and cheers from the crowd.
Earlier in the day, Francis denounced the "throwaway" culture of today's society that discards anyone who is unproductive as he celebrated his first public Mass in Bolivia.
The government declared a national holiday so workers and students could attend the Mass, which featured prayers in Guarani and Aimara, two of Bolivia's indigenous languages, and an altar carved from wood by artisans of the Chiquitano people.
In a blending of the native and new, the famously unpretentious pope changed into his vestments for the Mass in a nearby Burger King.
Speaking to the crowd in South America's poorest country, Francis decried the prevailing mentality of the world economy where so many people are "discarded" today — the poor, the elderly, those who are unproductive.
"It is a mentality in which everything has a price, everything can be bought, everything is negotiable," he said. "This way of thinking has room only for a select few, while it discards all those who are unproductive."
The day, however, threatened to be overshadowed by President Evo Morales' controversial gift to Francis upon his arrival: a crucifix carved into a hammer and sickle.
Both the Vatican and the Bolivian government insisted Morales wasn't making a heretical or political statement with the gift. They said the cross, dubbed the "Communist crucifix," had originally been designed by a Jesuit activist, the Rev. Luis Espinal, who was assassinated in 1980 by suspected paramilitaries during the months that preceded a violent military coup in Bolivia. On Wednesday, Francis, a fellow Jesuit, prayed at the site where Espinal's body was dumped.
"You can dispute the significance and use of the symbol now, but the origin is from Espinal and the sense of it was about an open dialogue, not about a specific ideology," said the Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi.
The Bolivian government insisted the gift wasn't a political maneuver of any sort, but was a profound symbol that Morales thought the "pope of the poor" would appreciate.
"That was the intention of this gift, and it was not any sort of maneuver ... It was really from great affection, a work designed by the very hands of Luis Espinal," Communications Minister Marianela Paco told Patria Nueva radio.