Saturday, March 26, 2016

Easter: A Celebration Of The Resurrection Of Jesus Christ


Easter: A Celebration Of The Resurrection Of Jesus Christ

Easter is one of the most important holidays in the Christian calendar.

03/25/2016 02:08 pm ET
  • HuffPost Religion Editors The Huffington Post
Easter Sunday is on March 27 and the Orthodox Church observes the holiday on May 1.
Easter, also known as Resurrection Sunday, celebrates the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Christians believe that Jesus was crucified on Good Friday, and rose from the dead three days later on Easter Sunday. The day marks the end of Lent, a 40-day period of fasting, prayer and penance, and is followed by a 50-day period called Eastertide, which ends with Pentecost Sunday.
The celebration of the resurrection of Jesus is observed as an Easter Vigil (also known as Paschal Vigil) in Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Lutheran and some Anglican churches, and “Sunrise Service” in many Protestant churches. Borrowing from the Jewish tradition, a liturgical day begins at sunset, and thus the Easter Vigil begins between sunset on Holy Saturday and sunrise on Easter Sunday.
The Easter Vigil service moves from darkness to light, symbolically re-enacting the Easter story of Jesus rising from the dead. The service begins outside the church where the priest lights and blesses a fire. A Paschal candle, representing the Risen Christ, is lit from that fire. The candle is processed through the church, and the Exsultet, Easter proclamation, is sung.
Passages from the Bible are read and the Eucharist (or Holy Communion) is celebrated. In many churches, this is also a time when new members are baptized into the Church in accordance with ancient tradition.
The “Sunrise Service” is similar, but often held outside early in the morning on Easter Sunday, so that attendants can see the sun rise.
However, not all Christians observe Easter Sunday. Groups like the Quakers and Jehovah’s Witness do not observe Easter, believing the celebration to be unbiblical.
Easter Sunday is preceded by Holy Week, which is the last week of Lent. Holy Week marks important events in Jesus’s life as described in the Gospels — his triumphal entrance to Jerusalem on Palm Sunday, the Last Supper on Maundy Thursday, and his death and crucifixion on Good Friday.
The celebration of Easter extends beyond the Church. Egg decorating, egg hunting and the Easter Bunny are examples of Easter customs that have been adapted by the secular world.

Holi 2016: Hindu Festival Of Colors



Holi 2016: Hindu Festival Of Colors Welcomes Spring

Holi is the day people throw colored powder and liquids at each other in celebration.

03/24/2016 03:05 pm ET
  • HuffPost Religion Editors The Huffington Post

Shailesh Andrade / Reuters
Holi is the Hindu festival of colors, celebrating the onset of spring.
Holi (also known as Dol Jatra, Basantotsav) is the Hindu festival of colors. It is celebrated at the end of the winter season, on the last full moon day of the lunar month Phalguna. In 2016, Holi falls on March 23-24.
Holi is observed with great fanfare by Hindus all over the world, with celebrations beginning on the eve of the festival with bonfires and prayers. On the day of Holi, people throw colored powder and liquids at each other in celebration.
Holi celebrations are particularly riotous in India as social rules are relaxed. Colored water is squirted on passers-by, and people are dunked into muddy water. Many people consume bhang, an intoxicating drink made from the female cannabis plant. Social barriers are broken as people of all ages, genders, castes and wealth gather together and celebrate the festival. In fact, it is said that one can get away with almost any kind of behavior on the day of Holi by saying “bura na mano holi hai,” or, “don’t mind, it is Holi.” In addition to the boisterous nature of the festival, this is a time for family members to get together, give gifts, eat special foods and decorate their homes. Overall, this is one of the most spirited and beloved festivals of the Hindu calendar.
The celebration of Holi is recounted in Hindu sacred texts and stories that have passed from generation to generation. Holi commemorates the miraculous story of Prahlada, a young boy and a devoted follower of the Hindu god Vishnu.
According to Hindu texts, Prahlada was born to Hiranyakashipu, the king of demons. Unable to tolerate Prahlada’s devotion to Lord Vishnu, Hiranyakashipu attempted to kill his son several times by poisoning him and throwing him from the top of a mountain but failed each time. Finally, he ordered his son to sit on a pyre on the lap of his demoness sister, Holika, who was protected from fire burning her. Prahlada accepted his father’s command and survived unharmed from the fire while Holika burned to death.
The burning of Holika gave rise to the tradition of lighting bonfires on Holi eve. Holi also celebrates the immortal love of the divine couple, Radha and Krishna. And Holi immortalizes the story of Kama, the Hindu god of love, his incineration to death by Lord Shiva, restoration and his love and sacrifice for all. These are three of the most popular stories, and as with most Hindu festivals, the stories vary slightly in different parts of India.
Holi 2016

Friday, March 25, 2016

Resurrection Witness


Resurrection Witness

April 03, 2016
Written by Kathryn Matthews
Sunday, April 3
Second Sunday of Easter
Focus Theme
Resurrection Witness
Weekly Prayer
O God, you raised up Jesus Christ as your faithful witness and the first-born of the dead. By your Holy Spirit, help us to witness to him so that those who have not yet seen
may come to believe in him who is, and was, and is to come. Amen.

Focus Scripture
Acts 5:27-32
When they had brought them, they had them stand before the council. The high priest questioned them, saying, "We gave you strict orders not to teach in this name, yet here you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and you are determined to bring this man’s blood on us." But Peter and the apostles answered, "We must obey God rather than any human authority. The God of our ancestors raised up Jesus, whom you had killed by hanging him on a tree. God exalted him at his right hand as Leader and Savior that he might give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins. And we are witnesses to these things, and so is the Holy Spirit whom God has given to those who obey him."
All Readings For This Sunday
Acts 5:27-32
Psalm 118:14-29 or Psalm 150
Revelation 1:4-8
John 20:19-31
Focus Questions
1. How would you describe the Pharisees?
2. Are we primarily called to protect and preserve past revelation, or to "help realize God's dream for the future"?

3. Have you ever had to face a challenge to your faith, or had to answer for it?
4. What is the good news that you share as a follower of Jesus?
5. How might Gamaliel be a model for us in the church today, when we disagree?
Reflection by Kate Matthews
Have you ever known anyone so convinced that she was right that she relished being persecuted for her beliefs and even took it as validation of her position? Well, you might understand then how the high priest and the council must have felt when those pesky followers of Jesus kept turning up and swaying the crowds with their persuasive, passionate speech. Imprisoning them didn't work: they just escaped miraculously from jail! No wonder the authorities were worried about the crowds turning against them. Someone had to do something about the situation.
Our story this week from the book of the Acts of the Apostles, although short, is so good in so many ways that one hardly knows where to begin to unpack its meaning. However, by not telling the rest of the story, our lectionary passage misses the opportunity for a particularly great teaching moment for the whole church, for congregations, and for each of us. And so we simply have to continue, past the end of the lectionary text, through the rest of this fifth chapter, to the words of Gamaliel the Pharisee in response to the controversy stirred up by the preaching of the disciples of Jesus. What do we do--what can we do--in the church when we cannot seem to agree about the truth? In verses 33-39, Gamiliel suggests one wise and Spirit-filled possibility.
Passionate and exuberant
Our passage provides a marvelous glimpse of the passionate, even exuberant conviction of Peter and his companions, the ones who walked "clueless" with Jesus and finally "got it" when the Holy Spirit came upon them at Pentecost, several chapters earlier in this book of the Acts of the Apostles. Now they feel downright compelled to speak the truth as they see it, even when they're face to face with a body that we might compare to both our Supreme Court (secular authority) and a panel of the most esteemed theology professors of our time. (Remember: these are unschooled fishermen!) This is not a new thing to the religious authorities, who have dealt with various popular teachers and their followers before. And it would be easy, reading Peter's words and agreeing with them as we do--that it's better to obey God than any human authority--to see how a misreading of the story could make "the Jews" the enemies of the truth. What calamities have followed from such a distortion of the story!
It's imperative that we approach this text and all the stories from the earliest days of the church with the understanding that the conflicts that arose are more like a family feud than one religion fighting another. Scholars observe that Peter's response to the authorities is a claim that is in line with the tradition of his own people. For example, he invokes the memory of Moses by speaking of Jesus as "Leader and Savior," and proclaims the repentance and forgiveness of sins that Israel longed for. These are not unfamiliar categories for the members of the Sanhedrin--they cut to the heart of who Israel claims to be as the people of God. But the Sadducees certainly don't appreciate the source of these words, or the exuberance of this bunch of trouble-making preacher-healers who are gaining a disturbing measure of power among the people.
Who bears the guilt?
The religious powers-that-be have to be careful because of the popularity of these preachers, which also forces them to take a second, uncomfortably hard look at their own role in the death of Jesus. David L. Tiede sums all of this up by reminding us of where we are in this scene: "Back in the court where the Lord Jesus had also been tried, the apostles put the accusers on trial, bearing witness against Jesus' wrongful death, testifying that in raising him from the dead, God turned Jesus' hideous crucifixion into a gift of restoration for Israel." The words, "for Israel," are not unimportant here.
First, a note about the "role" of the Jewish leaders in the death of Jesus, which has been used for almost two thousand years to justify unspeakable hostility and crimes against the Jewish people: Carlos F. Cardoza-Orlandi reminds us that "[i]n Luke through Acts, the Roman Empire is Jesus' executioner. The leaders of Israel, under Rome's colonial rule, were trapped in a conspiracy to kill the prophet from Nazareth," and in this scene we encounter "Israel's leaders, the Sadducees, wrestling with the political consequences of playing the Roman Empire's conspiracy game."
A second look at the Pharisees
But there's even more going on here, because there are complex factions among these Jewish authorities, two of them represented in this scene: the Pharisees and the Sadducees don't see eye-to-eye on many things. We have to acknowledge our common misconceptions about the Pharisees as harsh and legalistic: we forget that Jesus had friends who were Pharisees, and that he often enjoyed having dinner with them and debating with them. Robert W. Wall observes that Luke gives us a fuller picture of the Pharisees in his second book, because "the profile of the Pharisees in Acts, where some become believers (15:5) and Paul professes loyalty to his Pharisaic roots (23:6-9; 26:5), is in sharp contrast to that of the Gospels, where Pharisees unite with other religious and political groups in opposition to Jesus."
Unfortunately, the Pharisees have usually been presented to us very one-dimensionally, even though they actually had more in common with the disciples (and with us), belief-wise, than we might realize. For one thing, they believed in the resurrection when the Sadducees did not, and Colin Gunton points out the irony of this conflict "between two forms of Jewishness," about the right "way" to be faithful Jews, "a way within rather than outside the Jewish faith." In this scene, he writes, those who deny the resurrection face those "who base their teaching on the resurrection of the one put to death by those same authorities"!
The past against the future?
Philip Culbertson describes the influential Sadducees on one hand as "the strictest interpreters of Jewish tradition," especially "ritual and the Temple in Jerusalem," whose job it was to "protect God's past revelation." Unfortunately, their vision was at odds with both the Pharisees and the followers of Jesus, "who believed that their responsibility was to help realize God's dream for the future." (It sounds as if the past is, alas, pitted against the future instead of being in rich continuity with it.) Culbertson compares the Sadducees "to the most conservative interpreters of Bible and Christian tradition in our own times," so the internal conflict of the Jewish people here might "echo the struggles in the church today." It seems that today is not the first time in which conservative/traditional and liberal/progressive religious voices seem to be sharply at odds instead of finding common ground.
With that fuller picture, then, we may not be surprised that a proposal more tolerant than most of those arising in our own, post-modern church councils comes indeed from an ancient Pharisee, of all people. Gamaliel observes that other popular leaders have come along in the past, gathered followers and caused an uproar, but things quieted down afterward. Perhaps he senses that something different is happening this time, or perhaps he possesses a kind of wisdom, and a depth of trust in God's mysterious ways…wisdom and trust that make it possible for him to take the long view of things: "…if this plan or this undertaking is of human origin, it will fail; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them--in that case you may even be found fighting against God!" (5:38b-39a).
"The Gamaliels of the world"
Beverly Gaventa suggests that Gamaliel emerges not as "a narrow and censorious legalist, but…a warm and compassionate teacher who was quite aware that the God of Israel sometimes acted in benevolently surprising ways." This glimpse of "a sensitive and open-minded sage" just goes to show, Gaventa writes, that "it is not always easy to categorize or to place under one roof those who live just and compassionate lives. 'In my Father's house there are many dwelling places' (John 14:2), and one of those would seem to shelter the Gamaliels of the world." Beautiful!
Even if we didn't know the rest of the story, we sense from today's passage that Peter and the other disciples are headed for trouble: they will all end up as martyrs, dying for the sake of the truth they preach in the name of the crucified and risen Jesus. We often think of a martyr as someone who dies for a cause, but Dianne Bergant better describes a martyr as "a witness....not so much one who dies for the faith as one who lives it so completely that that person is willing to suffer any consequence, even death, in order to be faithful." And Kevin A. Wilson describes faithful witnesses, who are "not simply passive observers of an event..." [for] "they must actively make known what they have seen." Why do we do--or fail to do--the work of sharing the good news of the risen Jesus Christ? Are we merely passive observers, hearers, of the good news: does it stop here, with us? Are we afraid, or do we feel inadequate, to share something that has transformed our lives and given them meaning?
Speaking out against brutality as a witness to the truth
Recently, we observed the thirty-fifth anniversary (it feels like yesterday to me) of the martyrdom of Archbishop Oscar Romero, who gave his life because he spoke out against the brutal injustices perpetrated on the people of El Salvador. Like the disciples in this week's passage, Romero was not intimidated or deterred by earthly authority and was "willing to suffer any consequence, even death, in order to be faithful." However, Bergant also reminds us that, even if we don't actually suffer death for the truth, we can still witness to God at work in our lives and in the world by the way we speak and live. In fact, the way we live can itself speak volumes about what we truly believe, about what has grasped our lives. And this is important, even if we don't live in places of everyday violence.
Of course, so much brutality may be hidden, behind the doors of our homes, in the shadowed streets of our cities, and deep within our institutions. The world today hungers for the same good news that the disciples preached to the Sanhedrin so long ago. Bergant astutely observes that the church finds itself in a similar situation today: "Our religious convictions and aspirations seem to be floundering, sometimes even languishing. The rapid pace of social change has caused many to relinquish any sense of religious purpose. The number of people not raised within a religious culture has increased sharply." The world needs resurrection witnesses, then, who can share the good news in ways that people can hear and embrace a truth - perhaps one they've never encountered before - that will transform their lives.
Must we be bloody to be beautiful to God?
Both sides in today's story, the disciples and the Sanhedrin, were convinced that they possessed the truth. Perhaps Gamaliel had the humility to wait on God, to listen for God, and to open himself to the possibility of a new thing unfolding in the life of God's people. The council at least found him persuasive. Yes, they still flogged the disciples, and the disciples still persisted in their preaching. But there's a lesson there for us, in any case, and a question for us to explore, although neither is easy to resolve. One commentator, O. Benjamin Sparks, quotes George MacLeod, the founder of the Iona Community in Scotland, a place of deep spirituality and beautiful worship, as "saying that the 'church is most beautiful to God when she is bloody.'"
We recall the setting in which Oscar Romero gave his life, an almost inevitable conclusion to the story of his prophetic witness, and then we consider our own setting and our own story. Sparks poses the question: "The fact that so few of us, and so few congregations, face terrifying opposition in this choice-driven, liberty-loving culture begs us to ask a question that grows out of George MacLeod's assertion: Are we beautiful to God? Or is the church in the developing world beautiful, with manifold healings and severe persecutions showing us the way to truth and life?" At least some of us may object to MacLeod's claim: in a world full of bloodshed, the words "beautiful" and "bloody" are painful to read in the same sentence. We may prefer to think of a beautiful church as one that models and foretells the coming Day of the Lord, a time of peace and justice without the suffering and loss that has gone before. There surely is more than one way to be most beautiful in the eyes of God.
The past, the present, and the future in continuity not conflict
Whether we witness from the pulpit or in the pews, under the threat of brutal regime or private suffering, with words or deeds, we are part of that great movement that began back in Jerusalem, with a turbulent trial of a little band of troublesome preacher-healers, or farther back, with the bloody death of their Teacher, the Savior-Leader, and moved outward, even to the ends of the earth. Whatever and whenever we are called to share this truth, this good news, we can count on the presence and inspiration of the Holy Spirit, who was present with, and inspired, our ancestors, these early followers of Jesus. "Acts," Colin Gunton writes, "is written by one who is confident that the Spirit guides the fledgling church in what she does." We can trust that the same Spirit guides the church today, as well.
A preaching version of this commentary (with book titles) is at http://www.ucc.org/worship_samuel.
The Rev. Kathryn Matthews serves as dean of Amistad Chapel at the national offices of the United Church of Christ in Cleveland, Ohio (https://www.facebook.com/AmistadChapel).
You're invited to share your reflections on this text in the comments on our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/SermonSeeds.
For further reflection
Ella Wheeler Wilcox, 19th century American poet
"There is no chance, no destiny, no fate, that can circumvent or hinder or control the firm resolve of a determined soul."
Desmond Tutu, 21st century
"I wish I could shut up, but I can't, and I won't."
Søren Kierkegaard, The Journals of Kierkegaard, 19th century
"The tyrant dies and his rule is over, the martyr dies and his rule begins."
Lillian Carter, 20th century
"I don't think about risks much. I just do what I want to do. If you gotta go, you gotta go."
Joan of Arc, 15th century national heroine of France
"Get up tomorrow early in the morning, and earlier than you did today, and do the best that you can. Always stay near me, for tomorrow I will have much to do and more than I ever had, and tomorrow blood will leave my body above the breast."
Harvey Fierstein, 21st century
"If you deny yourself commitment, what can you do with your life?"
M. Scott Peck, 20th century
"A life of total dedication to the truth also means a life of willingness to be personally challenged."
Anne Frank, The Diary of a Young Girl, 20th century
"I don't think of all the misery, but of the beauty that still remains."
Clarence Jordan, 20th century
"The proof that God raised Jesus from the dead is not the empty tomb, but the full hearts of his transformed disciples. The crowning evidence that he lives is not a vacant grave, but a spirit-filled fellowship. Not a rolled-away stone, but a carried-away church."
Irving Stone, The Agony and the Ecstasy, 20th century
"Talent is cheap; dedication is expensive. It will cost you your life."

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Access to Contraception Is a Moral Issue


Access to Contraception Is a Moral Issue

03/18/2016 06:09 pm ET | Updated 1 day ago
 As a religious leader who is committed to ensuring that everyone has the access to contraception, I am anxiously awaiting oral arguments in an upcoming Supreme Court case. The case, Zubik v. Burwell, will be argued this Wednesday, March 23, and it centers on the ability of women to be able to access seamless contraceptive care, regardless of where and for whom they work.
The justices will consider whether religiously affiliated nonprofits, such as Catholic hospitals or religious universities, will be able to use their religion to prevent their female employees or students from being able to access contraception through their health insurance plans. Under the Affordable Care Act, health insurance plans are required to cover all FDA-approved methods of contraception at no cost to women. That means that women can go to their doctor, get information about contraceptive care, and make a decision about which method is best for them, regardless of price.
As part of the ACA, the Department of Health and Human Services offered an exemption to religious nonprofit employers who said that their faith prevented them from offering contraceptive care within their health plans. Religious groups who objected to providing contraception to their employees needed to register their objection with the government by simply signing a form that allowed them to opt out of the contraceptive benefit. The government would then be alerted that insurance companies should provide contraceptive care directly to these women without involving the objecting employers.
This provision has been challenged before, in the 2013 Hobby Lobby case. The justices opened the exemption to more employers, saying that as long as they signed the opt-out form, closely held for-profit corporations, such as the Hobby Lobby craft store chain, were also able to bypass offering contraceptive care. Now, a small minority of religiously affiliated institutions are claiming that their religion is burdened by the act of signing the opt-out form. The reality is that they are claiming this as an undue burden because they disapprove of their employees using birth control.

As a religious leader, I support religious freedom. Religious freedom means each individual has the right to exercise their own beliefs; it cannot mean that an employer has the right to deny its employees the right to exercise their own personal beliefs. All individuals must have the right to accept or reject the principles of their own faith without their employers’ objections or legal restrictions.
That’s why the Religious Institute joined the friend-of-the-court brief filed in the Zubik case to highlight the vast numbers of people of faith who support women’s access to basic health care, including contraception. We were joined by countless religious organizations who understand that no single faith can claim final moral authority over others and that contraception is part of preventive health care.
It is inconceivable to me (pun intended) that contraception is being made to be seen as controversial. Almost all American women, regardless of religious affiliation, use contraception. Almost all faith traditions in the United States accept modern methods of contraception, and even within faith groups that limit or prohibit such access, the religious commitment to freedom of conscience allows couples to intentionally create their families. Almost nine in ten people in the United States believe using birth control is morally acceptable.
Moreover, as a religious leader, I believe that in a just world, all people would have access to contraception. Denying women health insurance coverage for family planning services effectively translates to coercive childbearing, and disproportionately hurts low-income women and their children.
Religious leaders support universal access to family planning because it saves lives, improves health, enhances sexuality, and assures intentional parenthood. I oppose any attempt to restrict or deny access to family planning services and am offended by those who falsely use religious freedom as a way to force their morality on others. As a person of faith, I cannot stand by while this happens. I hope the Supreme Court joins me in affirming the dignity and moral agency of women and maintains their access to contraceptive care.
Follow Rev. Debra Haffner on Twitter: www.twitter.com/revdebra

Friday, March 18, 2016

Resurrection Joy


Resurrection Joy
March 27, 2016
Written by Kathryn Matthews
Sunday, March 27
Easter Sunday
Focus Theme
Resurrection Joy
Weekly Prayer
We exult in your love, O God of the living, for you made the tomb of death the womb from which you brought forth your Son, the first-born of a new creation, and you anointed the universe with the fragrant Spirit of his resurrection. Make us joyful witness to this good news, that all humanity may one day gather at the feast of new life in the kingdom where you reign for ever and ever. Amen.

Focus Scripture
Luke 24:1-12
But on the first day of the week, at early dawn, they came to the tomb, taking the spices that they had prepared. They found the stone rolled away from the tomb, but when they went in, they did not find the body. While they were perplexed about this, suddenly two men in dazzling clothes stood beside them. The women were terrified and bowed their faces to the ground, but the men said to them, "Why do you look for the living among the dead? He is not here, but has risen. Remember how he told you, while he was still in Galilee, that the Son of Man must be handed over to sinners, and be crucified, and on the third day rise again." Then they remembered his words, and returning from the tomb, they told all this to the eleven and to all the rest. Now it was Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and the other women with them who told this to the apostles. But these words seemed to them an idle tale, and they did not believe them. But Peter got up and ran to the tomb; stooping and looking in, he saw the linen cloths by themselves; then he went home, amazed at what had happened.
All Readings For This Sunday
Acts 10:34-43 or Isaiah 65:17-25
Psalm 118:1-2, 14-24
1 Corinthians 15:19-26 or Acts 10:34-43
John 20:1-18 or Luke 24:1-12
Focus Questions
1. What do you expect from life, and what do you dare to hope for?
2. When have you been surprised, caught "off guard" by good news and unforeseen joy?

3. When something "too good to be true" has happened in your life, what evidence did you need in order to trust in the good news?
4. What is the "new thing" God is doing today?
5. When you come to church on Sunday morning, what are you prepared to find, and to experience? Is resurrection joy something one can "expect"?
Reflection by Kate Matthews
So, first they rest, these women disciples, as they should on the Sabbath. But then they get themselves up, pull themselves together, gather the spices and go to work - to serve, to anoint the body of Jesus. Jesus, their beloved teacher, the reason they had had hope, if only for a little while, a hope that appears to be dashed after his crucifixion. Then something amazing happens: they find the stone rolled away, the tomb empty except for two men in dazzling white clothes.
The women are terrified, of course, but then the angels proceed to do a reassuring little Sunday school lesson with them, reminding them in a "He told you so, didn't he?" way that this empty tomb should really come as no surprise. It actually makes a lot of sense if they think back on all that Jesus said and did in their presence. "Ohhhh, that's right, we remember now..." - and they run back to the apostles, the eleven, the men who are hiding behind locked doors, shaking with fear (not that we blame them, after what they've seen and experienced in the past few days).
Mary Magdalene and the other women tell the apostles about the empty tomb and the dazzling men but the apostles, who are already very important, "know better" than these silly women and don't believe what they say. Who would ever put credence in the words of women, aside from Jesus, that is? But then, Jesus is dead and gone now, isn't he? Peter gets up anyway, just to see with his own eyes that the tomb is indeed empty. And he goes home "amazed."
A simple little word says it all
Sometimes it's the simple little things that make us stop and think, and help us to understand. For example, Theodore Wardlaw has noticed the many times Luke uses the word "but" in his telling of the Easter story: such a simple little word, but such a powerful one. Scholars write voluminously about the meaning of the resurrection, but much of what they say might be summarized in the "but" that keeps bringing us up short, "grabbing us by the lapels," Wardlaw writes, "stopping us in our tracks and forcing us to understand that no matter what we've heard, we haven't heard the whole story yet" (The Christian Century, March 20, 2007).
Wardlaw calls the word "but" a "defiant conjunction" that gets in the face of every cynical, hopeless, harsh evaluation of the state of the things – in the state of the world, and in the state of our lives, every doomsday prediction and pessimistic riff on the meaning of our lives, the value of our actions and the validity of our hope. This little word continues the conversation but changes the direction of things, dramatically, because God isn't through with things yet. God hasn't spoken the last word, not yet, not in the situation we find ourselves in any more than God had spoken the last word on Good Friday long ago.
Facing the tombs of our "Friday" lives
This has to mean something to each one of us, then, when we face the "tombs" of our lives: the losses and disappointments, heartbreaks and failures, tragic deaths and prolonged illnesses, loneliness and despair. Those tombs are our "Friday" lives, and Jesus shares them with us. But (there's that word again) Jesus also shares Sunday, and resurrection, new life and new hope, with us. It wasn't a one-time thing, or one more thing: it is the dawning of a new day, and new life as well.
In the Isaiah reading for this Easter Sunday, God promises to do something new and really big: to "create a new heavens and a new earth" (65:17). No matter what things look like now, this Easter morning says, Wait. Stop. But. We are part of something greater than ourselves, and our lives are lived in a new age of hope.
Remembering what Jesus said and what he did
The women at the tomb in this Easter Sunday account are faithful disciples who set out to serve and, in the process, learn a lesson that begins with remembering: this amazing moment actually makes sense if they connect what Jesus said and did with what they see before them, their personal experience. In The Lectionary Commentary: The Gospels, Paul Scott Wilson claims that the raising of Jesus authenticated his teachings and his deeds, and that our remembering of them, in the light of our own experience and that of the community, leads us to deeper faith. If we can't experience our faith, personally, no amount of abstract knowledge will have the power to change our lives. (This has been a difficult lesson for the institutional church.)
This empty tomb, then, is about the fulfillment of God's purposes, the same God who long before spoke of "new heavens and a new earth." N.T. Wright says that Easter Sunday began this new creation and grounded it in hope (The Meaning of Jesus: Two Visions, with Marcus Borg). This isn't only about "my own personal life after I die," then, but about God's whole new creation, God's new age, a way of being that continually calls us to the table, to reconciliation and healing, compassion and justice, to participation in the wonders of God's new creation. There's a commissioning for each one of us and for our communities of faith to join in what God is doing.
Preachers on Easter Sunday in churches all around the world will try to say a new word about the ever ancient, ever new word of God, God's "yes" to Jesus and God's "no" to the powers that killed Jesus but failed in the end – a failed plot, one might call it. We might ask, "How does something that happened so long ago matter to me today, especially with everything I'm going through right here and now? What does this have to do with me and my life, and my problems? Where do I fit into this picture?" N.T. Wright urges us to see our lives in a new light: "Acts of justice and mercy, the creation of beauty and the celebration of truth, deeds of love and the creation of communities of kindness and forgiveness – these all matter, and they matter forever" (The Meaning of Jesus: Two Visions).
"If the threats come to be fulfilled..."
In our story, in the story of faith, there is always that "but," and it carries us through every suffering, every loss, every Friday experience, knowing that the God of life will have the last word. I recall the exquisite words of Archbishop Oscar Romero, before his assassination by the powers that be over thirty years ago: "I have often been threatened with death. If they kill me, I shall arise in the Salvadoran people. If the threats come to be fulfilled, from this moment I offer my blood to God for the redemption and resurrection of El Salvador. Let my blood be a seed of freedom and the sign that hope will soon be reality." Jesus knew that his death would not be the end of the story; he knew that his blood would be "a seed of freedom and the sign that hope will soon be a reality."
However, I like to think that Easter isn't just a defiant conjunction like "but" – I like to think Easter is an adverb, too, specifically the adverb "anyway." I read that Mother Teresa had a little poem by Kent Keith, "Anyway," framed on her wall. She certainly was someone who knew something about suffering and faithfulness (and doubt, we have later come to understand) and, I suspect, resurrection and new life, too. I have this poem framed on my office wall, too, because it reminds me of all the things I know about "people" – how "unreasonable, illogical and self-centered" they are, and it tells me to "love them anyway." It tells me to "do good anyway," no matter what.
Anyway, nevertheless, regardless
I looked up this little adverb, "anyway," in the dictionary and there it is: "nevertheless," "regardless," it says. The sin of the world cut Jesus down; nevertheless, God raised him up. Hatred, fear and violence thundered on Friday, but God had the last word, anyway, on Sunday, because God loved the world too much to give up on the beautiful new creation that God had promised through the prophet Isaiah long ago.
But the Bible isn't just about things that happened a long time ago and far away to people we'll never know and can't relate to, like Isaiah and Mary Magdalene and Peter. This "anyway" happens all the time in our lives, too, right here and now. We know we sin, we all fall short of the glory of God, we fail – a lot – and God loves us anyway. We face loss and death and the ever-so-brief glory of our living, of all our accomplishments and plans, and God promises us new life, healing and wholeness anyway. Our relationships crash and burn, our kids worry us, there's never enough money, and God reassures us anyway, God offers us peace and wholeness and reconciliation. We turn away from God, and God offers us grace, anyway.
Which story do we tell?
If it's true, as Carolyn Heilbrun once said, that "power consists in deciding which story shall be told," then there is great power in our deciding to tell the story of the resurrection in every situation, good or bad. It reminds us of who we are as people of faith, but more importantly, of who God is. Justo L. González describes this important moment in the gospel story, after the death of Jesus: "The resurrection is not the continuation of the story. Nor is it just its happy ending. It is the beginning of a new story, of a new age in history….What now remain are no more than skirmishes in a battle that has already been won" (Luke, Belief Series).
Isn't this why folks come to church on Sunday morning? Don't we come from our problems and struggles in the hope of hearing a Word from the Lord? Doesn't that Word of God sustain us in hospital beds and waiting rooms alike, at gravesites and in the longest night of deep agony, doesn't this Word comfort us and challenge us, guide us and surprise and delight us? Aren't we then experiencing the new life of resurrection in the new age begun on the first Easter Sunday morning? Every time we come to the table where all are welcome, we break bread together as a sign of our hope for that new creation in all its fullness, not just in glimpses and promises.
Challenge and joy and perhaps threat as well
Every Easter, we're reminded that we are not lost, and that we are part of the new story that has begun. But being part of that story means not returning to our homes and our lives unchanged. Justo L. González notes that those women and Peter himself and all the disciples coming out of their hiding place could have just gone back home to their work and their lives, disappointed but resigned. But the "joyous event" of the resurrection calls them and us to pick up our crosses and carry it on the path of "faithful discipleship," a "risky enterprise," for "things would be much simpler and safer if one were not impelled by the resurrection to oppose injustice, oppression, and all forms of evil. The full message of Easter is both of joy and of challenge" (Luke, Belief Series).
Just as the Gospels were shaped by the context in which they were written, so the context in which we hear this message of joy and challenge may inform the way we receive it. Pendleton B. Peery writes: "In our comfortable, Western, first-world context, we tend to see the resurrection as the epilogue to the story of Jesus' life and death. Through our ordered worship and well-rehearsed liturgical routines, we work our way right up to the empty tomb of Easter morning, only to walk away from the experience as if nothing has changed" ("Theological Perspective Luke 24:1-12," Feasting on the Gospels, Luke). Peery and González both recall the title of a poem by the Guatemalan Presbyterian, Julia Esquivel, who sensed that there are those who will be "Threatened by Resurrection."
So we might imagine ourselves sitting in a corner in a room where we listen as this story is read by those who live in poverty, who bear the consequences of the unjust use of natural resources and the appropriating of an unfair share of the world's wealth. There are countless children of God who live lives of hunger, poverty, violence and oppression, and at least some of the time, our own lifestyle may contribute to their suffering. For them, Peery says, the empty tomb means "that Christ has claimed victory over the powers that perpetrate violence, injustice, a world full of proscribed, dead-end possibilities, many of which keep our first-world lifestyle secure while the two-thirds world suffers under the weight of oppression. For those who are less wed to the world the way it is, the good news of resurrection takes center stage. It is no epilogue. It is a game changer" ("Theological Perspective Luke 24:1-12," Feasting on the Gospels, Luke). This is an uncomfortable lens to use as we read this story - good news that "threatens" to question our lives in painful ways.
"I love you, and I am not dead"
One of my favorite books of all time is The Color Purple. (Spoiler alert: I'm going to give away some of the story.) The main character, the narrator who tells us her story through her letters addressed to God, is Celie, a poor black woman who has been abused all her life. But she has somebody in her life who loves her, her sister Nettie, who gets chased away by Celie's violent husband, Albert. Albert doesn't let Celie ever see the mail, so Celie never hears from Nettie and starts to believe that her sister is dead. But Nettie isn't dead. She has gone to Africa as a missionary and writes to Celie many letters over the years; she never gets a reply, but she keeps writing letters to Celie anyway. Then, one day, Celie finds the packet of letter from Nettie that Albert has stashed away under the floorboards. "Dear Celie," Nettie writes, "I know you think I am dead. But I am not. I been writing to you, too, over the years, but Albert said you'd never hear from me again and since I never heard from you all this time, I guess he was right. There is so much to tell you that I don't know, hardly, where to begin…but if this do get through, one thing I want you to know, I love you, and I am not dead."
I love you, and I am not dead. You may think I am dead and you are unloved, but I am not dead, and you are loved. Celie suffers terrible childhood abuse from her father, and further abuse through her forced marriage to a violent man, has her babies taken away from her and her sister driven from her, but God loves Celie and her life, so full of hardship because of the hard-heartedness of others, is transformed anyway. When Celie and Nettie are both old and gray, they are finally reunited, and they fall down on the ground with joy. Everyone, she says, must be thinking about how old they look. "But I don't think us feel old at all. And us so happy. Matter of fact, I think this the youngest us ever felt." Old, but young and new, anyway.
Easter is God's Yes to Jesus and to new life and new creation and to us. When the world said or says no to Jesus and to new life and new creation, to reconciliation and peace, justice and healing and mercy, God says yes anyway and raises up our hope. Jesus says, I love you, and I am not dead. Of all the sweet sounds that we may hear, are any words sweeter to our ear than those?
A preaching version of this commentary (with book titles) is at http://www.ucc.org/worship_samuel.
The Rev. Kathryn Matthews serves as dean of Amistad Chapel at the national offices of the United Church of Christ in Cleveland, Ohio (https://www.facebook.com/AmistadChapel).
You're invited to share your reflections on this text in the comments on our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/SermonSeeds.
For further reflection
Eugene H. Peterson, 21st century
"It is not easy to convey a sense of wonder, let alone resurrection wonder, to another. It's the very nature of wonder to catch us off guard, to circumvent expectations and assumptions. Wonder can't be packaged, and it can't be worked up. It requires some sense of being there and some sense of engagement."
Brennan Manning, 21st century
"For me the most radical demand of Christian faith lies in summoning the courage to say yes to the present risenness of Jesus Christ."
Mother Teresa, 20th century
"Never let anything so fill you with sorrow as to make you forget the joy of Christ risen."
Arundhati Roy, 21st century
"Not only is another world possible, she is on her way. On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing."
Dr. Jim Yong Kim, President of the World Bank
"To say that there is not enough money is just a lie. There's plenty of money in the world; it's just not going to health care for poor people."
Emily Dickinson. 19th century
"To live is so startling it leaves little time for anything else."
Martin Luther, 16th century
"Be thou comforted, little dog, Thou too in Resurrection shall have a little golden tail."

Thursday, March 17, 2016

St. Patrick’s Day 2016:



St. Patrick’s Day 2016:



St. Patrick first came to Ireland as a slave and became a devout Christian during his captivity.

St. Patrick’s Day is best known for parades, beer, and turning rivers green, but the holiday has a long history that’s more somber than its current incarnation.
Saint Patrick
St. Patrick was born around 387 C.E. in Scotland, and turned to God once he was kidnapped by slave traders and brought to Ireland to be a shepherd.
“The love of God and his fear grew in me more and more, as did the faith, and my soul was rosed, so that, in a single day, I have said as many as a hundred prayers and in the night, nearly the same,” he wrote, according to Catholic Online. “I prayed in the woods and on the mountain, even before dawn. I felt no hurt from the snow or ice or rain.”
He joined the priesthood after his escape at the age of twenty, and eventually became a bishop. Patrick was tasked with the mission of bringing Christianity to Ireland, where he was enormously successful in converting much of the mainly Druid and pagan population.
Print Collector via Getty Images
St Patrick’s stone on the Hill of Tara.
History
St. Patrick’s Day originated as a Roman Catholic holiday recognizing St. Patrick, and was brought to America by Irish immigrants as a way of affirming their identity. It’s since been adopted by Americans of all backgrounds.
Traditions
Some Catholics celebrate St. Patrick’s feast day by going to mass, while other observers of the holiday wear orange and green and eat cabbage and corned beef. St. Patrick’s Day parades are commonly held in many cities.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Youngsters hold flags as they watch Irish pipers move up Fifth Avenue in the annual St. Patrick’s Day parade in New York, March 17, 1949.
Symbols
The shamrock is associated with St. Patrick, as he reportedly used the three-leafed plant as a way of explaining the Trinity — Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
Education Images via Getty Images
A man dressed as St. Patrick waves at the crowd during a parade in South Boston, Massachusetts.

Also on HuffPost

X

Friday, March 11, 2016

Pope Francis, Year Four


Pope Francis, Year Four

On March 13th, Pope Francis begins his fourth year as bishop of Rome, and pastor to the world. His first three years have been riveting in many ways, drawing an exceptional amount of attention, even for a media-saturated age. By word and example, he preaches a gospel that remains close to the teaching of Jesus himself. His is not a papacy of privilege and prerogative and pomposity, but one of prophetic defense of the poor, the marginalized, the weak, the sick, the imperfect, the broken and the discarded, against economic and political systems that treat them as lazy and as losers worthy of contempt and punishment. With at least one presidential candidate in the U.S. flaunting his abundant wealth, shouting about the need for torture and an end to human rights, and talking down to Pope Francis, the coarseness and hatefulness of hostility to an eloquent voice for the poor is on display.
Many Catholics and others across the globe follow closely what Pope Francis says and does. He draws large crowds when he travels both to centers of power such as the White House in Washington, as well as to relatively marginal places. In centuries past persons permitted to actually meet the pope were expected to genuflect and kiss his feet. Now we see roles reversed, when it is the pope, the vicar of Christ, who kneels to wash and kiss the feet of the imprisoned and of the poor. In centuries past the death penalty was imposed even in the Papal States; but since at least the papacy of Blessed Paul VI, and that of Saint John Paul II, popes have called for mercy and rehabilitation for even the most heinous criminals. The Church today teaches that their dignity as human beings, and their call to discipleship of Christ, remains intact no matter what wrong they may have done. In his address to Congress, Pope Francis brought up the topic of defense of human life, and focused on the need to abolish the death penalty everywhere. The Church's teaching on the death penalty has developed in a direction that excludes it in every case. Those that say that Church teaching cannot change do not know much about history.
The kinds of people beatified or canonized may also change. Though Bishop Oscar Romero was assassinated in 1980 while presiding at Mass, his cause for beatification was delayed for decades by apologists for right-wing violence in El Salvador. But near the end of Benedict XVI's papacy, and decisively with Pope Francis, delays came to an end: Pope Francis declared Romero a martyr and made his courageous service of the poor, and his voice for the poor, an example for others to follow. Standing up for the oppressed and the marginalized, the refugee and the migrant, is not one thing among many others for Pope Francis: they are at the very heart of a Christian vocation.
The Pope's encyclical on the environment (Laudato si') has an abundance of footnotes, notes that have probably not been read by many, even among those that think that they have given the document careful attention. Yet one of the most interesting things about the encyclical is how it is grounded not only in the teaching of earlier popes and councils, but in the recent teachings of episcopal conferences around the world, in Latin America, in Asia, in New Zealand, as well in Europe or North America. An encyclical is a teaching document published by a pope; Francis makes clear that he also teaches in a collegial way, a way that is not merely his quirky, personal opinions, to take or leave according to one's one whim. Laudato si' is official Catholic teaching as much as any encyclical ever is. It also invites dialogue, especially on the practical details of how to stop climate change and to preserve the natural environment.
Opposition to this encyclical was not long in coming, especially from vested interests that could see their accumulation of extravagant wealth endangered by national laws or international agreements aimed at reducing dependence on fossil fuels and other key factors in environmental degradation. Pope Francis demonstrates how it is the poor, and poorer parts of the planet, that suffer the most from such degradation. Some claim that Pope Francis and the Catholic Church "fail" business people, but is it not instead certain business people that fail to acknowledge the truth and justice of the Church's social teaching? Like other prophetic voices, Pope Francis often calls his hearers to repentance and radical conversion. He sometimes sounds like a Lenten preacher, even when it is not the season, such as when his "Christmas greetings" to the Roman curia, in December 2014, echoed John the Baptist in the desert issuing a clarion call to a dramatic reformation of life. But such appeals are above all a call to a new life of grace and mercy, and to a deepened, humble discipleship of Jesus, the Good Shepherd.
In both autumn 2014 and autumn 2015 bishops met in synod in Rome to discuss and debate pastoral care of the family. Pope Francis set the topic, but he elicited free-ranging debate and prayerful discernment on some of the most difficult issues where merciful pastoral care is challenged by those seeking to uphold what they claim are unchanging and unchangeable laws, rules, norms. For rigorists, adherence to the letter of the law trumps all other considerations, no matter the catastrophic consequences of such severity. Like seventeenth-century Jansenists, they do not trust Jesuits, seeing them as soft on sin and overly optimistic about human nature. But Francis, the Jesuit pope, in his homily for the closure of the October 2015 synod, affirmed that the true defenders of doctrine uphold not its letter but its spirit: they place people above ideas, and God's mercy above condemnations. For Pope Francis, who calls himself a sinner, mercy is not merely the theme of a special year; it is the perennial heart of what is divine and most fully human.

What Will Happen on the Day I Die


What Will Happen on the Day I Die

On the die I die a lot will happen.
A lot will change.
The world will be busy.
On the day I die, all the important appointments I made will be left unattended.
The many plans I had yet to complete will remain forever undone.
The calendar that ruled so many of my days will now be irrelevant to me.
All the material things I so chased and guarded and treasured will be left in the hands of others to care for or to discard.
The words of my critics which so burdened me will cease to sting or capture anymore. They will be unable to touch me.
The arguments I believed I'd won here will not serve me or bring me any satisfaction or solace.
All my noisy incoming notifications and texts and calls will go unanswered. Their great urgency will be quieted.
My many nagging regrets will all be resigned to the past, where they should have always been anyway.
Every superficial worry about my body that I ever labored over -- about my waistline or hairline or frown lines -- will fade away.
My carefully crafted image, the one I worked so hard to shape for others here, will be left to them to complete anyway.
The sterling reputation I once struggled so greatly to maintain will be of little concern for me anymore.
All the small and large anxieties that stole sleep from me each night will be rendered powerless.
The deep and towering mysteries about life and death that so consumed my mind will finally be clarified in a way that they could never be before while I lived.
These things will certainly all be true on the day that I die.
Yet for as much as will happen on that day, one more thing that will happen.
On the day I die, the few people who really know and truly love me will grieve deeply.
They will feel a void.
They will feel cheated.
They will not feel ready.
They will feel as though a part of them has died as well.
And on that day, more than anything in the world they will want more time with me.
I know this from those I love and grieve over.
And so knowing this, while I am still alive I'll try to remember that my time with them is finite and fleeting and so very precious -- and I'll do my best not to waste a second of it.
I'll try not to squander a priceless moment worrying about all the other things that will happen on the day I die, because many of those things are either not my concern or beyond my control.
Friends, those other things have an insidious way of keeping you from living even as you live; vying for your attention, competing for your affections.
They rob you of the joy of this unrepeatable, uncontainable, ever-evaporating Now with those who love you and want only to share it with you.
Don't miss the chance to dance with them while you can.
It's easy to waste so much daylight in the days before you die.
Don't let your life be stolen every day by all that you believe matters, because on the day you die, much of it simply won't.
Yes, you and I will die one day.
But before that day comes: let us live.
Follow John Pavlovitz on Twitter: www.twitter.com/johnpavlovitz

Into Jerusalem


Into Jerusalem
March 11, 2016
Written by Kathryn Matthews
Sunday, March 20
Sixth Sunday in Lent (Palm/Passion Sunday)
Focus Theme
Into Jerusalem
Weekly Prayer
Compassionate God, your love finds full expression in the gift of Jesus Christ your Son, who willingly met betrayal and death to set us free from sin. Give us courage to
live obediently in these days until we greet the glory of our risen Savior. Amen.
Focus Scripture
Luke 19:28-40
After he had said this, he went on ahead, going up to Jerusalem. When he had come near Bethphage and Bethany, at the place called the Mount of Olives, he sent two of the disciples, saying, "Go into the village ahead of you, and as you enter it you will find tied there a colt that has never been ridden. Untie it and bring it here. If anyone asks you, 'Why are you untying it?' just say this, 'The Lord needs it.'" So those who were sent departed and found it as he had told them. As they were untying the colt, its owners asked them, "Why are you untying the colt?" They said, "The Lord needs it." Then they brought it to Jesus; and after throwing their cloaks on the colt, they set Jesus on it. As he rode along, people kept spreading their cloaks on the road. As he was now approaching the path down from the Mount of Olives, the whole multitude of the disciples began to praise God joyfully with a loud voice for all the deeds of power that they had seen, saying, "Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord! Peace in heaven, and glory in the highest heaven!" Some of the Pharisees in the crowd said to him, "Teacher, order your disciples to stop." He answered, "I tell you, if these were silent, the stones would shout out."
All Readings For This Sunday
Liturgy of the Palms
Psalm 118:1-2, 19-29
Luke 19:28-40
Liturgy of the Passion
Isaiah 50:4-9a
Psalm 31:9-16
Philippians 2:5-11
Luke 22:14-23:56
Focus Questions
1. Why do you think the disciples were singing that day as Jesus entered Jerusalem?
2. What do you dare to hope for in your life and the life of the wider community?

3. What does it mean to "keep the peace"? What is the role of religious leaders in "keeping the peace'?
4. How do you respond to Frank McCourt's story from his visit to Dachau?
5. What are the risks of being a Christian today?
Reflection by Kate Matthews
Perhaps today should be called "Cloak Sunday" instead of "Palm Sunday," because Luke's account of Jesus' entry into Jerusalem has no palms, and no hosannas either, two of the most familiar details of this story in the other three Gospels. It's kind of hard to imagine Palm Sunday without them. The cloaks are there, laid out to make his ride easier, as in the other accounts, and there's singing, too - praises being sung, but not by a fickle crowd that will change its mind in a few days and call for Jesus' death. Instead, these voices come from Jesus' own disciples, a whole multitude of them, who have been following him throughout his ministry. They may run and hide when things get rough in a few days, but they never call for Jesus' crucifixion.
These are, after all, people who have seen such great things, who have been so profoundly moved by Jesus' words and his deeds of power that they can't help but sing out today, as Jesus enters triumphantly into their holy city, Jerusalem: Jesus, the hope of a people who long for deliverance from the powers that be, the forces that crush them, that hold them down. Luke says they echo the words of the prophet Zechariah long ago as they proclaim Jesus the king who comes in the name of the Lord, and they sing of peace in heaven, as Sharon Ringe notes, here at the end of Jesus' life, just as the angels in heaven sang of peace on earth at its beginning.
Triumphant joy or ominous peace?
Perhaps it's difficult for us to connect with what's happening in this scene, even though we're familiar with the story. Think of the occasional parade welcoming a championship sports team back to their home city (in Cleveland, this is so occasional that our imaginations are challenged); nowadays this is about the only time we can picture ourselves in a crowd eagerly watching the entry of someone who sparks such celebration. We've all seen old photographs from a time when ticker-tape parades were given in New York City for triumphant heroes of one kind of another. Can you imagine feeling so much hope and joy at the entrance into your city or town of someone who represents not a political, military or sports victory, but the coming of peace itself?
As it happens, if you were listening to this story almost two thousand years ago, when it was written, and of course you lived somewhere in the eastern Mediterranean ancient world, you would hear something more. It would sound familiar to you, very much like the ominous entrance into your city of a military conqueror, escorted by his troops.
In their wonderful book, The Last Week, Marcus Borg and John Dominic Crossan begin their account of Jesus' last seven days with a colorful description of this procession by the King of Peace into one end of Jerusalem at the same time that the Roman Empire's representative, Pontius Pilate, full of brute power, enters at the other end. Picture this: Pilate has arrived to "keep the peace" in the city during the turbulent time of Passover, when the crowds always get a little unruly. He travels with troops and flags and weapons, all the signs of empire, very impressive, of course. And he rides in on a magnificent warhorse, in case the flags and weapons and troops aren't a sufficiently intimidating display of power.
A warhorse, or a donkey?
On the other hand, Jesus - filled with a different kind of power - makes his entrance riding a humble donkey, surrounded by his somewhat ragged group of followers, and we know that he doesn't "keep" the same kind of peace Pilate and Rome intend to "impose," a business-as-usual kind of peace that benefits the empire and the folks on top. No, Jesus brings instead the peace that surpasses understanding, and much of what is about to unfold in the next few days will be the price he pays to bring it.
His disciples, of course, have seen things that have changed their lives forever and have raised their hopes sky-high. Maybe they still aren't sure exactly what to hope for, when their leader rides – of all things – a donkey, a humble work animal rather than a grand warhorse. What sort of signal does that send, what sort of statement is Jesus making? Of course, this particular donkey, like any animal suited for sacred use, has never been ridden, and that should tell them something. Something sacred is happening, right before their eyes. Yes, a common donkey may not be the sort of animal one rides to war or in conquest, but this is no triumphant warrior or conquering power coming into the holy city or into our hearts. This is the King of True Peace.
These disciples are, as usual, clueless. They don't know what's about to happen in the next few days; today, they're just full of joy and expectation. (Evidently, they haven't been listening any of the times that Jesus said he had to suffer and die but would rise again.) But the Pharisees, like many religious leaders in all times, are worried. They seem to have better instincts than most folks about these things, and they can sense trouble brewing. They know about Pilate coming in the other gate of the city, and they're not ignorant of what can happen if Rome feels threatened even by a ragtag group of religious enthusiasts. Rome steps on people, brutally, and puts them in their place. So the Pharisees fret: "Teacher," they say, "tell your followers to hush. They're going to bring down the heel of Rome on all our throats. Don't be causing trouble now."
All creation wants to sing out
Jesus tells them that it's no use and reminds them – and us – that, despite our best calculations and precautions, all creation longs to participate in the drama of salvation. Even if you could get the disciples to quiet down, he says, the stones would shout out the good news, or, as the wonderful preacher Fred Craddock puts it, just as stars can guide, lions and lambs can rest together, and in a few days, the earth can quake and the sun can go out at the worst moment of all. Ironically, these worrywart Pharisees are the ones that now disappear from the story. This is their last appearance, this word of fear their last word, in the Gospel of Luke, before they step off the stage of the drama that is about to unfold.
The worst moment is still ahead by several days, and this day is just one of joyful anticipation, at least on the part of the disciples, if not Jesus himself. After the deeds of power they've witnessed, why should they fear anything or anyone? Their faith has been emboldened by what they've seen, as long as they can forget what they've heard: Jesus' repeated predictions of his suffering and death. But their faith has raised their hopes into dreams of something we can't quite assume we know. Perhaps this entrance of Jesus evokes the kind of joy and relief that we can only imagine, for example, when United Nations troops arrive in a country torn apart by genocide, or when a convoy of trucks carries grain to a starving people. But whatever their hopes, the song these disciples sing comes from deep within them.
Making the decision to follow Jesus past the celebration
This week's passage kicks off, if you will, the holiest of weeks for Christians. There is no "off-season" for being a follower of Jesus; it's an everyday thing, week in and week out, 24/7. Not just Sunday, not just holy days and not just when we're in church or when we're praying. Being a Christian is an every-day, every moment, all-of-our-lives journey. Still, this week is Holy Week, which comes at the end of Lent, a season of conversion, of turning around, of re-orienting our lives toward God just in case we've slipped off course. It's been a time for us, as individuals and as a community, to study and pray and examine our lives, to look inward and to ask ourselves the difficult question of whether we're ready and willing to follow Jesus not just today, in this glad procession, but all the way to the cross.
The cross. Everything Jesus has said and done leads up to the cross, all the healing, the teaching, the calling of disciples, the fasting and praying, the driving out of demons and the calming of waters, the multiplying of loaves and the blessing and breaking of bread, the time in the wilderness and the time on the road, the words to his disciples and the arguments with the powerful, all of his life, has come to this, the facing of death on a cross.
This death was the ultimate gift, the "going all the way," as my friend who is in recovery once told me, that Jesus was willing to go all the way, to pay the ultimate price to show us how much he loves us. I believe that is what the death of Jesus is about – the ultimate gift of love, the gift of a compassionate God who anguished at the death of Jesus, who wept at the death of Jesus, not the ultimate sacrifice required by an angry God, the only sacrifice that would "satisfy" such a God. Rather, I believe God, who is compassion, God who is love, grieved the death of Jesus so much that God said no to death itself and raised Jesus up again on the third day, and this God will raise us up one day, too.
Mis-reading the Bible
Alas, we Christians, we followers of Jesus, have not done such an excellent job of "getting" this message of compassion and love. Instead, for two thousand years, we've often been part of the same kind of brute power systems that stepped on those people of Jerusalem long ago. For centuries, once we got the upper hand, we participated in a whole array of horrors, from the Inquisition to religious wars, from witch-burnings to the repression of women and the selling of slaves, from colonial empires to the killing of Jews…and we used a misreading of the Bible in every case to justify what we did. And all of this time, the God of compassion and love must have wept.
Perhaps it is most appropriate, then, here on the edge of Holy Week, to reflect for a moment on the awful history of events set in motion by a misreading of the events of Holy Week that blamed the Jewish people for the death of Jesus. Just as we can carefully read Luke's account and see that the palms and hosannas that we assume are there, aren't actually there, a mis-reading of the New Testament distorts the story of Jesus' death and blames the Jewish people instead of the powers-that-be, the powers that be in every age and every place that wound the heart of God.
A mis-reading of the New Testament ignores the fact that Jesus himself was a Jew, as were the Apostles and his mother and our ancient ancestors in faith, Moses and Abraham and the rest. When I think about the deepest suffering of the world, I think it is something that most powerfully unites us, that ought to help us find common ground, to recognize the humanity of each of our brothers and sisters, while seeing the image of God in them, too.
Prayers that reach the heart of God
One of my favorite writers is Frank McCourt, who told the beautiful story of his young adulthood in his book, 'Tis. I had read Angela's Ashes, the story of his heartbreakingly difficult childhood growing up in a slum in Limerick, Ireland, when times were tough and his father drank away the family's food money, and he and his mother and brothers barely survived. A lot of this suffering was rooted in the terrible injustices and cruelty of the British Empire against the Irish people, about which we learn less in our history books than in the life story of Frank McCourt.
As a young man, McCourt was a soldier stationed in Europe not long after World War II. One day he was on laundry assignment, an assignment that took him, of all places, to Dachau, one of the most notorious concentration camps of the Nazis, which was now empty except for where the laundry for nearby military camps was being done. One of the other soldiers, Rappaport, was Jewish and, in great distress, refused to enter the camp. McCourt went in, and as he looked at the ovens and thought of "what went in there," he wondered if he should touch them, and whether "it's proper to say a Catholic prayer in the presence of the Jewish dead. If I were killed by the English would I mind if the likes of Rappaport touched my tombstone and prayed in Hebrew? No, I wouldn't mind after priests telling us that all prayers that are unselfish and not for ourselves reach God's ears….I don't know if it's proper to say the Our Father touching the door of an oven but it seems harmless enough and it's what I say hoping the Jewish dead will understand my ignorance" ('Tis: A Memoir).
Better than any skillful misreading of the Scriptures, Frank McCourt's clumsy but heartfelt theologizing at the mass graves of innocents surely touches the heart of God. It draws us back again, ironically, to why Jesus died, to be the face of a compassionate God who lets nothing come between us and the love that holds us every day of our lives, not just during Holy Week, not just when we're in church, not just when we're praying or feeling particularly holy ourselves. This week, as we stumble toward Jerusalem, we can rely on God's grace to carry us every step of the way. On this Palm Sunday, though (with or without palms), in this one moment, we can make a way for Jesus, we can throw our cloaks on the ground and sing our songs of praise, and trust the unknown future to the God who works good in every circumstance and in every holy week of our lives.
A preaching version of this commentary (with book titles) is at http://www.ucc.org/worship_samuel.
The Rev. Kathryn Matthews serves as dean of Amistad Chapel at the national offices of the United Church of Christ in Cleveland, Ohio (https://www.facebook.com/AmistadChapel).
You're invited to share your reflections on this text in the comments on our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/SermonSeeds.
For further reflection
Beverly Donofrio, 21st century
"One day can change your life. One day can ruin your life. All life is is three or four big days that change everything."
Plato, 4th century b.c.e.
"The measure of a man is what he does with power."
John Steinbeck, 20th century
"Power does not corrupt. Fear corrupts... perhaps the fear of a loss of power."
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 19th century
"The greatest thing in this world is not so much where we stand as in what direction we are moving."
Kurt Vonnegut, Palm Sunday: An Autobiographical Collage, 20th century
"Trust a crowd to look at the wrong end of a miracle every time."
Wilma Rudolph, 20th century
"I ran and ran and ran every day, and I acquired this sense of determination, this sense of spirit that I would never, never give up, no matter what else happened."
Thomas a Kempis, 15th century
"Great tranquility of heart is his who cares for neither praise nor blame."
"Whenever you do a thing, act as if all the world were watching."
Mahatma Gandhi, 20th century
"The day the power of love overrules the love of power, the world will know peace."
and
"Whenever you are confronted with an opponent. Conquer him with love."
Bill Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes, 20th century
"How come we play war and not peace?"
"Too few role models."
Samuel Smiles, 19th century
"An intense anticipation itself transforms possibility into reality; our desires being often but precursors of the things which we are capable of performing."
Norman Cousins, 20th century
"Wisdom consists of the anticipation of consequences."