Saturday, November 28, 2015

Pope: It Would Be 'Catastrophic' If 'Special Interests' Derailed Climate Talks

Pope: It Would Be 'Catastrophic' If 'Special Interests' Derailed Climate Talks

Take note, Congress.


NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) — Pope Francis warns it would be "catastrophic" if special interests get in the way of a global agreement to curb the fossil fuel emissions blamed for global warming at a meeting next week in Paris over climate change.
In a speech to the African U.N. headquarters on Thursday, Francis said the Paris negotiations mark a crucial step in developing a new energy system that "corrects the dysfunctions and distortions" of the current model of development and fights poverty.
Francis has made ecological concerns a hallmark of his nearly 3-year-old papacy. But on Thursday, he took particular aim at those who deny the science behind climate change.
In the United States, that accounts for several Republican presidential candidates and lawmakers, who have opposed steps U.S. President Barack Obama has taken on his own to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
He said: "It would be sad, and dare I say even catastrophic, were special interests to prevail over the common good and lead to manipulating information in order to protect their own plans and interests."

The Mystical Side of Music

The Mystical Side of Music

Posted: Updated:
BRAIN MUSIC
Print
I have taken a serious devotion to learning piano during the past year. After completing a wonderful online course in beginning and intermediate piano and music theory, I have been continuing my musical journey by building a repertoire of songs and pieces in a variety of genres; from classical to 80's pop music.

Lately, I have noticed that the only moments during the day when I can maintain an absolute silence is when my fingers are hosting my feelings and the piano in a conversation. Perhaps one might be inclined to think that this is the reason why my lips are sealed shut, because my hands are the ones participating in a dialogue with the instrument. Perhaps that is so, but I think there is another subtle power to music that only becomes evident once we compare this medium of communication with its writing counterparts, prose and poetry.

For Muslim mystics, such Muhyi al-Din Ibn al-ʿArabi (d. 1240), prose is the ideal medium for communicating divine law; a body of knowledge that requires a definitive and non-ambiguous set of terminology and syntax. On the other hand, it is poetry alone that can satiate the passion of the mystic to express the ambiguous and perplexing nature of the mystical experience; where clear boundaries of the law give way to the paradox of the supra-rational. We may posit this distinction as one where prose operates within the realm of the intellect, with its abstract concepts and categories and where poetry rules supreme in the land of the qalb (heart) and rūḥ (spirit); where a constant taqallub (fluctuation) and murāwaḥa (vascillation) is the definitive state of reality.

However, anybody familiar with Ibn al-ʿArabi's thought and the larger discourse on cosmo-ontology and saintology in Islamic mysticism knows that there is yet another 'beyond' to these two realms of the intellect and spirit. In the human microcosm, this third aspect of the laṭīfa rabbāniyya (lordly subtlety) that forms our cognitive faculties is called al-sirr (the secret). Alongside the intellect, heart, soul and spirit the secret constitutes the human communication center with the divine; it is God's throne in our being and is, sine qua non, the divine trace in the human body.

Moreover, the very name of this aspect of the lordly subtlety of man, the 'secret', alludes to its purpose: for it is the only trace of human volition that remains active when the mystical journey reaches its climax; amidst that presence where silence is no longer required, but inevitable. There, language loses its way and the human speaker must opt instead for constant stillness and impeccable hearkening, in order to experience the divine secret. It is also here, at that moment, where I believe music resides and conquers.

Ibn al-ʿArabi reminds humanity that the reason our species enjoys beautiful voices and the sound of a musical instruments is because its reverberations pierce through the layers of our psyche straight to that 'secret', to that trace of divinity that has remained from the days of the primordial covenant; when God spoke to humanity and asked: "Am I not your Lord?" Between the placement of this question in the Qurʾan and the response by humanity that immediately follows: "Indeed!" there is an empty space between the words of scripture that reflects an abyss of annihilation we felt when we heard the very essence of beauty speak to us... it is the spark of this memory of auditory ecstasy that is ignited through music, in all its forms.

If prose mentions the Named through the name and poetry alludes to the Named through metaphor and imagery then music forces us to listen to the Named as he speaks to us. The power of music, then, does not lie solely in the fact that it operates from within the kingdom of the secret; but, most importantly, it alone can transcend and pierce through the human layers of social division, intellectual abstraction and delimitation and takes us instead to the realm of dīn al-Ḥaqq (the religion of the Real), where there is only:

"I'm the First and Last, Inward and Outward" (Qur'an 57:3)

"I'm the Alpha and Omega, First and Last, Beginning and End" (Revelations 22:13)

Thursday, November 26, 2015

Pilgrims Were Refugees

AdChoices

Obama Reminds Us That Pilgrims Were Refugees Once, Too

"The world is still full of pilgrims."

By Roberta Rampton
WASHINGTON, Nov 26 (Reuters) -- President Barack Obama urged Americans to show generosity to Syrian refugees in his Thanksgiving message on Thursday, reminding them that the Pilgrims who came to America in 1620 were themselves fleeing persecution.
"Nearly four centuries after the Mayflower set sail, the world is still full of pilgrims – men and women who want nothing more than the chance for a safer, better future for themselves and their families," Obama said in his address.
Obama's plan to accept 10,000 refugees from Syria became a lightning rod for political criticism after attacks, claimed by Islamic State militants, killed 130 people in Paris two weeks ago. The United States is leading an international coalition fighting the group in Syria and Iraq.
<span class='image-component__caption' itemprop="caption">A woman looks on during a welcome event for refugees in an Allentown, PA church.</span> A woman looks on during a welcome event for refugees in an Allentown, PA church.
Since the Paris attacks, Americans now identify terrorism as the most important problem facing the country, Reuters-Ipsos polling shows.
The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill to suspend the refugee plan and intensify refugee screening measures before lawmakers left Washington for the Thanksgiving break. Several Republican candidates for the November 2016 presidential election have also said the refugees pose a risk.
"People should remember that no refugee can enter our borders until they undergo the highest security checks of anyone traveling to the United States," Obama said in his address.
Obama has vowed to veto the House refugee bill. But the White House has said it is open to working with lawmakers on tighter security measures for visitors from 38 countries who do not need a visa for short visits to the United States.
In his address, Obama quoted from letters he had received from Americans welcoming Syrian refugees.
"One woman from Pennsylvania wrote me to say, 'Money is tight for us in my household ... But I have a guest room. I have a pantry full of food. We can do this,'" Obama said.
"Another woman from Florida told me her family's history dates back to the Mayflower - and she said that welcoming others is part of 'what it means to be an American,'" he said.
(Reporting by Roberta Rampton; Editing by Peter Cooney)

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Prophets of Peace


Sunday, December 6
Second Sunday in Advent

Focus Theme
Prophets of Peace
Weekly Prayer
Out of the embrace of mercy and righteousness, you have brought forth joy and dignity for your people, O Holy One of Israel. Remember now your ancient promise: make straight the paths that lead to you, and smooth the rough ways, that in our day we might bring forth your compassion for all humanity. Amen.
Focus Scripture
Luke 1:68-79
[Zechariah said:]
"Blessed be the Lord God of Israel,
   for he has looked favorably
      on his people and redeemed them.
He has raised up a mighty savior for us
   in the house of his servant David,
as he spoke through the mouth
   of his holy prophets from of old,
that we would be saved from our enemies
   and from the hand of all who hate us.
Thus he has shown the mercy
   promised to our ancestors,
and has remembered his holy covenant,
   the oath that he swore to our ancestor Abraham,
to grant us that we, being rescued
   from the hands of our enemies,
might serve him without fear,
   in holiness and righteousness
   before him all our days.
And you, child, will be called
   the prophet of the Most High;
for you will go before the Lord
   to prepare his ways,
to give knowledge of salvation
   to his people by the forgiveness
   of their sins.
By the tender mercy of our God,
   the dawn from on high will break upon us,
to give light to those who sit in darkness
   and in the shadow of death,
to guide our feet into the way of peace."
All readings for this Sunday
Malachi 3:1-4 or Baruch 5:1-9
Luke 1:68-79
Philippians 1:3-11
Luke 3:1-6
Focus Questions
1. Do you ever think a blessing is "too good to be true," even if you prayed for it?

2. What gifts does your "generation" bring to the life of faith today?
3. Where do you feel closest to God?
4. How do we find that our lives "matter totally" within God's larger story?

5. How do you and your church embody God's tender mercies for others?
Reflection by Kate Matthews (Huey)
The Gospel of Luke begins, of course, with the story of the angel Gabriel foretelling the amazing birth of a baby boy who is destined for great things in the story of salvation. This birth is remarkable not because the boy's mother is a virgin but because she's old: Elizabeth, wife of Zechariah the priest, who is also old. These two have lived righteous and holy lives, but it appears that they are denied the blessing of children. The story sounds familiar, especially after hearing about Hannah just two weeks ago, but this time Zechariah the would-be father appears to be the one who's praying, in the depths of his heart, for what seems impossible: the gift of a child. Gabriel brings Zechariah the good news that his prayer has been heard and he is indeed going to have a son, whom he will name John. Ironically, Zechariah appears to be unable to comprehend that the answer to his prayer might actually be yes, and he questions the angel, who doesn't seem too pleased about being challenged, even by a priest. (But, then, perhaps a priest ought to know even better not to question a messenger from God.)
After Gabriel strikes him speechless, Zechariah spends the next nine months in silence; presumably Elizabeth enjoys many opportunities during that time to speak her own mind. When the baby is born, she insists, against popular opinion (and no one seems to know why the neighbors are trying to name this baby in the first place), that he will be named John, rather than Zechariah, after his father. (How does Elizabeth know, we might ask, that the child's name should be John?) The old priest agrees, his speech is restored, and as he holds his son in his arms, he's so full of the Holy Spirit that he can't help bursting out in praise for all that God has done, and he looks forward to what God is yet to do (the text calls it "this prophecy" in verse 67). His prayer is called the Benedictus, which means "blessing" in Latin. In this first chapter of Luke, we've already heard Mary sing the Magnificat; J. Clinton McCann, Jr., compares these hymns to the songs in a Broadway musical: the words tell a story and help us to understand what's going on.
Singing our speeches
Like Mary, Zechariah uses language so lovely that we understand why this is really a song rather than a speech (even though Luke says in verse 67 that he "spoke" it), and why the church has loved it, and sung it, for centuries: this hymn connects the early Christians' story to the story of Israel, remembered, redeemed, restored. Israel, pressed down and even flattened by one empire after another (Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Rome), is never obliterated or without hope of a future, because they know that God's promises are true. Zechariah reviews those promises, recalling the voice of God through the prophets, the gift of the great king, David, and of course mercy and salvation even in the face of sin and in the wake of suffering, destruction, and death. In his book, Luke for Everyone, N.T. Wright reminds us that our elders are the ones "who cherish old memories and imaginations, who keep alive the rumour of hope," and he notes that Zechariah "has pondered the agony and the hope for many years." In Zechariah's song, then, we hear the "larger hope" that "[t]hings will be put right" in the end.
One of the most haunting lines from this first chapter of Luke's Gospel is back in the angel Gabriel's promise to Zechariah that this child, who would of course gladden the hearts of his mother and father, would also "turn the hearts of parents to their children" (v. 17). In his sermon, "An Intrusive Absence," Walter Brueggemann recalls the long wait and deep hope of the people of Israel, who looked for Elijah the prophet to return because they remembered him as one who "upset everything, healed things, made a difference." They trusted that God would act to make things right, through one who would come into their midst to "reconcile the generations….[and] heal our families of old and young, poor and rich, of have-nots and haves...." Perhaps we could begin to reach across the divide between "the old and young" if we learn to appreciate the distinctive gifts that the different generations bring to the table. For example, the Rev. Otis Moss III, pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, calls Elizabeth and Zechariah's generation meeting with the generation of young Mary (vv. 39-56) a "Pentecostal moment" (see "Where is God's Spirit at work today?" http://www.ucc.org/vitality/ready-set-grow/video/otis-moss.html).
Our story is part of a longer story
Scholars stress the continuity of the Christian story with the ancient story of Israel, and several see Zechariah's "witness," if you will, as a link between those stories, an affirmation that they are part of the same, larger story of God at work in the world, offering salvation to all the people (even the Gentiles!). For example, Sharon Ringe hears the prophet Isaiah echoed in this song, and the theme of the forgiveness of sins recalling the Year of the Jubilee, which we will encounter again in Jesus' inaugural address, in chapter four of this Gospel. And Ronald J. Allen and Clark M. Williamson see Zechariah the priest "as authorizing the ministry of John, and, hence, the ministry of Jesus and the church."
Zechariah doesn't just sing about God's ancient faithfulness; he also sings of the new thing God is about to do, raising up "a mighty savior" from the house of David. In fact, he sings as if God has already done this great thing. Luke is telling us these stories together, but we understand why John is important only if we understand the central importance of Jesus, the mighty Savior, whose "way" John prepares. Zechariah looks at his newborn son John, whose name means "God is gracious," and feels God's grace through the sweep of history and the promise of what is yet to be. How many parents have looked at their newborn child and felt a mysterious but powerful hope for the future of the world in the small miracle they're holding!
Theology at unexpected moments
My own experience of parenthood affected my theology just as much as it affected everything else in my life. When I held my baby boy, also named John, for the first time, I became something of a theologian, long before I went to seminary and studied theology. As I gazed at that baby, I knew why God looked at the beautiful work of creation and saw that "it was good": I recognized that God's creation of this little baby, in the same way, was good. While I understood that John was created in freedom and could and would make wrong choices now and then, I knew in my heart that we are created in beauty and innocence and grace, and that each new baby is a moment of hope, not just for one family, but for the whole world. It occurs to me that Zechariah, the priest who knew what it felt like to stand in the most sacred place of all, "the sanctuary of the Lord" (1:9), what Richard Swanson calls "the center of the world," seemed to be having the most profound spiritual experience of his life at home, holding a newborn baby.
Many scholars note that the story of Zechariah the priest long ago was the early church's way of teaching about the importance and the role of John the Baptist. Marvin A. McMickle ties this Sunday's Old Testament reading to Zechariah's song in this way: "If Malachi 3:1-4 tells us that God will send a messenger who will prepare the way and cleanse the temple, then Luke 1:68-79 tells us that messenger is John the Baptist." Yes, John was important, but he wasn't the most important, and the early church wanted to make sure everyone understood the difference between John and Jesus. Of course, no one I know thinks John the Baptist was really the Messiah, but there's more than one lesson in this story, as so often happens in the Bible. That beautiful moment, and that realization, and that hope in Zechariah when he looks at his newborn son…I think that is a teaching moment for us today, in the church.
The personal and the public, stories large and small
There are several more themes in this text that bear deeper reflection in this season of Advent, when we are perhaps a little more in touch with the deeply personal and yet also yearn to connect with the wider world, in generosity and peace. There's that continuity between our "small" lives and the "larger" events of history: N.T. Wright says that "Luke's story vibrates equally with the personal hopes and fears of ordinary people" even as he tells the story of God at work in the sweep of history; "both the big picture and the smaller human stories," Wright says, "matter totally." Zechariah and Elizabeth are experiencing the most remarkable things happening to them personally, but they look at their little baby, and they see God's promises kept for their whole people, past and present, and even more wonders to unfold in the story of God at work in the world. We need to find the meaning of our lives, our stories, then, in God's larger story.
There's also the tension that we often encounter between salvation as something that we experience here and now, the healing for our selves, our families and the world, even for creation itself, and the salvation that will come after we die, when we will live joyfully in God's presence. Mostly, people of faith seem to focus on the latter, on "getting to heaven." And yet, those who live under someone else's heel, like Zechariah and Elizabeth, and like Luke's own little early Christian community, who knew Rome's harsh oppression, have to wonder when God is going to deliver them and punish "those who hate us" (v. 71). This is where that tension lies, if we want to live an authentic faith: "walking in the way of peace" may appear easier for someone not living under the heel of an oppressor (and that oppressor may be a "force," like debt or illness or poverty). Christians have to discern where the "way of peace" leads them on behalf of others who suffer, especially if we benefit, even indirectly, from that suffering. Marvin McMickle subtly ties these two threads together when he claims that "God is surely a God of wrath where injustice is concerned, but Zechariah points to 'the tender mercy of our God' (v. 78)."
Righteousness is justice, not self-righteousness
There is, then, something very real and embodied about this salvation, not just a heavenly, spiritual one but also a healing of the damage caused by sin and brokenness, violence and greed: a restoration of things to what they ought to be. Zechariah sings of forgiveness, of light, of holiness and righteousness. (Scholars note that "righteousness" could be understood as "justice," which makes a lot of sense if we're talking about the damage done to one another and to the earth by our sin and selfishness.) All of these promises of God, all this hope, engage us in the story of salvation and draw us in rather than relegating us to watching from the sidelines. We're called to embody God's own tender mercies, right here, right now, toward the poor, the orphan and the widow, and the stranger in our midst.
In the Bible and in most of human history, men have claimed center stage and most of the power, but Richard Swanson's reflection draws our attention to the women who seem to be bystanders in this story (actually, how the mothers of these two important babies are bystanders is hard to comprehend; presumably they were central to the births). Swanson suggests that Zechariah's long silence is underneath the voices of the women, Mary and Elizabeth, who express the "powerful hopes" of their people: "Only after women have sung the hopes of the Jewish people into the story is that silence punctured. Zechariah reveals that he, too, shares the hopes that give life to the Jewish people. The story holds open the possibility that these hopes were breathed into life by the singing of Mary and Elizabeth, which he could have overheard in his silence." Silence, then, gives others a chance to speak, and a chance to teach us something, a chance to voice shared hopes and longings. The baby, John, is seen by his father Zechariah as the one who will prepare the way for Jesus, the "mighty savior" God has graciously sent, so the role of this tiny child in salvation history is obviously crucial. Do you see your own role in salvation history as crucial, or do you feel like a bystander in this unfolding and yet ancient drama?
A recurring theme in the Gospel of Luke is that of reversal of fortune: already, we hear it in songs sung by both Mary and Zechariah, in this very first chapter. According to Rosetta Ross, the priest Zechariah and Elizabeth are not among the poor, singing of their liberation from poverty; instead, they're from the "Jewish upper class." When this member of the upper class sings about God at work, making things right, he illustrates how there may be some surprises, and not just a few ironic twists, in store for us: "New sight, resulting from the dawn breaking in and giving light, insinuates possible paradigm shifts and the reversals identified with Luke's Gospel. Perhaps those identified as enemies earlier in the song may become friends."
How do you describe peace?
Is there a better way to describe peace than former enemies becoming friends? Well, there is certainly a fuller, more comprehensive one, and the end of Zechariah's song inspires writers like Marvin McMickle to draw a picture of "a time of wholeness, well-being, security, happiness, and contentment that will extend to all people"--which is what it means to walk "in the way of peace." When Zechariah becomes a father and sings of his joy as he gazes at his newborn son, it's as if he yearns even more deeply for peace; doesn't the need for peace in the world, and the healing of creation, become more pressing when we have children whose futures stretch out beyond our own? Zechariah sings of a salvation that is healing for the damage the world does because of sin and brokenness, because of greed and hatred and violence; he sings of a restoration of things to what they ought to be. When Zechariah sings of God's forgiveness, he isn't describing a legalistic transaction, a reward we earn by our deeds, but a movement of the heart, God's heart, toward us, even in our weakness and humanity. But he also sees in his son the beauty of hope and the promise of God's tender mercy, and, most of all, the promise of peace.
Such a seemingly impossible dream for us this Advent: that enemies might become friends, that emptiness might become fruitfulness, that the earth might be healed and the world might know peace. Perhaps not so impossible, for every light that breaks through, every blessing that heals our heart and gives us hope, every newborn baby that reminds us of the newness of God's tender mercies each morning, is an Advent kind of experience, a taste of what is yet to come, a sign of what God is about.
Where can we find "the way of peace"?
When we consider those beautiful words at the end of Zechariah's song about dawn breaking over us, we long for such light, especially in a world, a nation, so divided today. While our painfully long election season divides us more bitterly with each passing day, we're shaken by terrorist attacks and the threat of more danger hovering over us. Many of us, especially during the holidays, struggle to make peace in our own families before grappling with the challenges that face us in the larger community. The world around us once again (and again) worries about terrorism and war in dozens of places around our now-tiny and well-connected globe, and we argue in demoralizing ways about how to protect ourselves while we respond to the needs and suffering caused by those threats and that ugly violence. Our defensiveness and fear do not speak well of us as human beings, let alone as people of faith.
And yet, individually, so many of us live with illness, poverty, and addiction--as well as threats and violence in our neighborhoods and even our own homes. We may have relationships that are painfully difficult for us. We may struggle with depression, anxiety, and worries over financial problems. Our children cause us concern and our parents need our care; forces much more powerful than we are, and yet forces in which we participate, pollute the air, the water, and the earth that our grandchildren will need. The world seems like a mess much of the time.
And yet, and yet. We gather in church, together in a time of fear, and like Zechariah living under the heel of the Roman Empire, we know that we, too, are children of promise, and God has not forgotten us. We hear the story of God's love, and, here and there, we experience that light breaking over us. In our time and in the midst of this people, we listen for the story again, we wait in the darkness together, we gather our strength, renew our courage, and feast upon the mercy of God so that we can go back out into the world and be light and love for those who, like us, long to find the way to the path of peace. What can it mean to be the Body of Christ unless we give ourselves to the coming of God's grace and mercy, and participate in bringing it to reality for one another, and for each of God's children? "And you, child…": these are the words that God sings over each one of us, not just at our birth, but each new morning, God's tender love rejoicing at our beauty, God's tender mercies leading us onto the path of peace.
A longer, preaching version of this commentary (with book titles) can be found at www.ucc.org/worship/samuel.
The Rev. Kathryn Matthews (Huey) serves as dean of Amistad Chapel at the national offices of the United Church of Christ in Cleveland, Ohio (https://www.facebook.com/AmistadChapel).
You're invited to share your reflections on this text on our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/SermonSeeds.
For Further Reflection
Fred Rogers, 20th century
"When I say it's you I like, I'm talking about that part of you that knows that life is far more than anything you can ever see or hear or touch. That deep part of you that allows you to stand for those things without which humankind cannot survive. Love that conquers hate, peace that rises triumphant over war, and justice that proves more powerful than greed."

Black Elk, 20th century
"The first peace, which is the most important, is that which comes within the souls of people when they realize their relationship, their oneness with the universe and all its powers, and when they realize at the center of the universe dwells the Great Spirit, and that its center is really everywhere, it is within each of us."
Barbara Kingsolver, Animal Dreams, 20th century
"The very least you can do in your life is figure out what you hope for. And the most you can do is live inside that hope. Not admire it from a distance but live right in it, under its roof."
Thích Nhất Hạnh, 21st century
"The present moment is filled with joy and happiness. If you are attentive, you will see it."
Marilynne Robinson, Gilead
"Now that I look back, it seems to me that in all that deep darkness a miracle was preparing. So I am right to remember it as a blessed time, and myself as waiting in confidence, even if I had no idea what I was waiting for."
and
"There is a reality in blessing....It doesn't enhance sacredness, but it acknowledges it, and there is a power in that."
Aristotle, 4th century B.C.E.
"Hope is a waking dream."
Bill Watterson, 20th century
"'How come we play war and not peace?'
'Too few role models.'"
Carl Sandburg, 20th century
"A baby is God's opinion that the world should go on."

Friday, November 20, 2015

Sign of Things to Come



Written by Kathryn Matthews (Huey)

Sunday, November 29

First Sunday in Advent



Focus Theme

Signs of Things to Come



Weekly Prayer

O God of all the prophets, you herald the coming of the Son of Man by wondrous signs in the heavens and on the earth. Guard our hearts from despair so that we, in the company of the faithful and by the power of your Holy Spirit, may be found ready to raise our heads at the coming near of our redemption, the day of Jesus Christ. Amen.



Focus Scripture

Luke 21:25-36



[Jesus said:] "There will be signs in the sun, the moon, and the stars, and on the earth distress among nations confused by the roaring of the sea and the waves. People will faint from fear and foreboding of what is coming upon the world, for the powers of the heavens will be shaken. Then they will see 'the Son of Man coming in a cloud' with power and great glory. Now when these things begin to take place, stand up and raise your heads, because your redemption is drawing near."



Then he told them a parable: "Look at the fig tree and all the trees; as soon as they sprout leaves you can see for yourselves and know that summer is already near. So also, when you see these things taking place, you know that the kingdom of God is near. Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all things have taken place. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.



"Be on guard so that your hearts are not weighed down with dissipation and drunkenness and the worries of this life, and that day catch you unexpectedly, like a trap. For it will come upon all who live on the face of the whole earth. Be alert at all times, praying that you may have the strength to escape all these things that will take place, and to stand before the Son of Man."



All readings for this Sunday

Jeremiah 33:14-16

Psalm 25:1-10

1 Thessalonians 3:9-13

Luke 21:25-36



Focus Questions



1. How do you respond to "apocalyptic talk"?



2. How do Jesus' words in this passage bring you hope?



3. What "near and close at hand" things are signs of God's coming changes?



4. What is your greatest longing this Advent season?



5. What do you think the stillspeaking God is calling you to in this new year?



Reflection by Kate Matthews (Huey)



After Thanksgiving is over, the world around us seems to get even more serious about preparing for Christmas. Perhaps the word "serious" isn't the best one to use, since the preparations that occupy our time and thoughts (and consume our money, and perhaps put stress on our relationships and health) can't compare to the preparations that Jesus advises us to make, in our reading from the Gospel of Luke on this First Sunday in Advent. While we set up Nativity scenes with a sweet baby Jesus lying in a manger, we hear from the grown-up, just-about-to-die Jesus, standing in the Temple, teaching about the coming catastrophe – the destruction of that Temple by the Romans in 70 C.E. – which Luke of course must have known about when he wrote his Gospel fifteen years or so later. But Jesus seems to be talking about even more than that: the end of all things, the End of Time itself. It certainly puts those Christmas preparations in a different perspective.



Here, at the beginning of the beautiful season of Advent, the intent of the church is not to spoil things with talk of the end of the world while the culture around us is set for weeks of parties, gift-giving, family reunions and, for many who stay away the rest of the year, attendance at church. Actually, these are (or can be) all good things; however, there's more going on here than just celebrating a festive season at the end of one year before we begin a new one. The season of Advent itself actually begins a new church year, even though it comes before the end of the secular calendar year. It's no wonder we get a little confused among these beginnings and endings, when a new year opens with a reading that appears to be about the end of everything. But it's important, at every beginning, to take the long view, to have the end in mind, even here, at the start of another new church year.



New beginnings mean change



We can't enjoy beginnings and endings if we don't like change. And Jesus is describing the biggest change of all, the transformation of all things, when "the Son of Man" (in the Common English Bible, "the Human One") rides in "on a cloud with power and great glory" (v. 27). People will be filled with fear, even more fear than when the Romans completely devastated Jerusalem and the Temple. We know that the violent, mighty power of Rome was impressive to behold, but on that great day, the heavens themselves will collapse, and the stars and the moon will fall out of their places in the sky, nothing will work as it should, and things will no longer go on as they have in the past. This time, even the Gentiles are going to be on the receiving end of the suffering and the judgment. There's going to be some kind of day of reckoning for everyone, just you wait and see.



Now, this is "apocalyptic" talk. When things are especially threatening for a group of people who feel persecuted and small in a big bad world, they express their hope for deliverance and their trust in the God who is really in charge of everything by speaking in large, dramatic terms about a day of justice when all things will be made right. Back in the book of Daniel, the same kind of language expressed the people's hope for rescue from the evil tyrant Antiochus IV Epiphanes, almost two hundred years before Jesus. How else would God up-root the power of something as mighty as the Empire of Rome, if not by doing big things in big ways, even bringing down the heavenly bodies from their courses?



Bringing down the powers that be



Dianne Bergant reminds us of the chaos that reigned before God brought order, back in the beginning of things, at creation itself. All those frightening metaphors and apocalyptic images like the moon and stars falling out of the sky draw our attention to God's return and the beginning of a whole new age. William Herzog observes that the sun was the symbol of Rome itself, with the moon and the stars representing the Empire's "client kings" clustered around it, so we can better understand that, when Luke is talking about the "powers of the heavens" being shaken, it's a kind of code about events that are quite down to earth, even, we might say, political, because the powers-that-be, right here, are about to be brought down.



I wonder if young (and not-so-young) adults might relate this to the destruction of the Death Star in their own epic, the (original) "Star Wars" trilogy. The language of empire was also used in that series to describe the terrible might of the evil power that oppressed planets and galaxies. Empires come and empires go, but they rarely come or go gently, or quietly.



Not surprisingly, there's a tension in the commentaries on this text. Some scholars emphasize the cosmic over the personal dimensions of the upheaval Jesus foretells: Paul Scott Wilson claims that Luke isn't talking about our own individual deaths but about the end of all things, including time itself. Even for those of us who have grown up with the threat of nuclear holocaust over our lives, the end of time is the ultimately frightening thought. Or perhaps not: rather than the destructive "tantrum" of a "spoiled child," Wilson continues, this is about God bringing an end to sin and injustice, which ultimately ought to be seen as a good thing, rather than a frightening one. If we trust the One who makes promises to us, we can indeed stand up then and raise our heads in anticipation of the redemption at hand (v. 28).



Living "in the meantime"



Other voices seem to take a somewhat different approach to the text, focusing on things more here and now, as close at hand as the fig tree Jesus wants us to observe. Dianne Bergant reminds us of the distress and upset of all upheaval, large and small, personal and communal. We know that even good change brings a kind of stress and instability, and we humans prefer things to be calm, predictable, and comfortable.



Years ago, I read a book by William Bridges, Transitions, that described the in-between time we experience in any major change in our lives. There is a point, or a period of time, that we spend in between one time or place, and another time and place. In that in-between time, we have to live with things being not so clear or comfortable, not familiar and reassuring, and yet not being what they will be one day.



That seems to be what Advent living is about, Bergant writes: the way we live in the meantime, which, surprisingly and simply, "calls us to live the usual unusually well." Lately, it seems that we're developing a heightened awareness of the importance of the everyday; no, not just its importance, but its holiness. I think that's what Bergant is encouraging us to see, that Advent, a time of heightened awareness, is "as ordinary as the birth of a child; it is as extraordinary as the revelation of God."



Finding the holy every day



As an illustration of "living the usual unusually well" and keeping alert at the same time, Richard Ascough suggests a short story written by Leo Tolstoy, "Where Love Is, God Is," about a cobbler named Martin whose hope for a dramatic revelation of God is answered by the everyday sightings of God as love in action, in charity, justice, and compassion toward the people he meets each day. Could we write the story of our own lives, in our own, ordinary occupations, experiences, hopes and dreams, as a series of sightings of God in the everyday living of our lives?



Barbara Brown Taylor draws our attention to that fig tree, suggesting that the people might have been focusing on the wrong things, "abstract things, like judgment or salvation, or on dramatic things, like earthquakes and plagues." Instead, Jesus turns their attention to "the most ordinary events of their lives," and the most ordinary things, like the sprouting of a fig tree. In this way, he reminded them "that they did not have to work so hard." Taylor wonders about the way we use the time we have (it's really all we have, she says) while we're waiting for Jesus to return. Be alert, yes, she writes, but not because we're afraid of a coming disaster but so that we ready for the return of God.



And while we wait, we should pray. John J. Pilch observes that we seem to depend on human technology like satellites and telescopes to warn of impending disaster (not to mention weather radar, earthquake detectors, and other marvels of science), but it seems to me that more folks listen to dire predictions from fundamentalist preachers, the Left Behind series, and purported ancient Mayan prophecies about the end of the world (not that our scientists could predict that, of course). In any case, Luke urges us instead to pray to be delivered from the coming catastrophe. Catastrophe or not, a prayerful life is always a good thing.



Fear and hope



Fear and hope: I sometimes wonder if our culture feeds our ambivalence on this end-times question, with television and movies joining preachers and proselytizers to scare us to death, or at least to ramp up our anxiety to almost-unbearable levels with depictions and predictions of end-of-the-world cataclysms. But does all of this talk of impending doom lead to real change in the way we live now, or do we walk away from such "entertainment" having drained our spirits and our minds of some of that anxiety, safely, so that we can return to life as usual?



Years ago, when I was at home during the day, raising children, visitors to my front door came preaching to me about the end of the world, which I had already spent most of my childhood dreading. I suggested (sincerely) that they might consider preaching the gospel - the good news - of how much God loves us and forgives us and offers us a new life of grace; I assured them that they would find doors up and down the street opening much more often, because I knew how hungry my neighbors were (as I was) for such a message. They said no, they basically had their story and were sticking with it. The dramatic end of the world was that part of the biblical message that mattered most to them, but it didn't seem to be preached in the context of anything but getting people to see things their way, even if they had to strike fear in people's hearts to make their point.



Are these "the last days"?



These contemporary proselytizers are not alone, of course. Many people throughout history have seen themselves as living in "the last days." Jesus and Paul and many if not most early Christians spoke of the end coming in their own lifetime or at least in their own generation. But so did our ancestors later on, including Martin Luther and colonial Christians like Cotton Mather in North America (see, for example, Garry Wills, Head and Heart: A History of Christianity in America).



Many years ago, I read that there was an upsurge in building and planning in Christian Europe after the year 1000 turned safely, without the expected end of the world at the close of one millennium. However, Richard Ascough's observation that our anxiety levels seemed lower in 2000 than they were in 1999, on the eve of another new millennium, is poignant, for he couldn't have foreseen the terrible events of 2001 and the fear of terrorism that descended upon us that year. Truly, we never know what is just around the corner, and current events make this even more tragically clear this Advent season.



Yearning toward peace



During Advent, we're looking forward, just as our Jewish ancestors in faith looked forward, to the fulfillment of God's promises of peace. Christians see in Jesus the gift of peace, and we sing carols about that peace, and yet we look around and see that the world is not at peace. Justice does not reign, and the earth groans in pain, and nations continue to settle their disputes by killing each other's young, along with any civilians who get in the way.



Richard Swanson reminds us that there are children in our congregations (or, alas, not there) who know well what it feels like for "the sun and the stars" to fall from the sky because of parental abuse and neglect; in their small worlds, their parents are the sun and the moon and the stars. Luke wrote his Gospel in a world where the population was overwhelmingly poor peasants who had to live in the moment because of the precariousness of their lives, while those at the top concentrated on maintaining their own position, power, and wealth. If, as John Pilch says, Jesus' warning was in fact to the rich (we can always substitute the word "greedy" for "rich" in Luke's Gospel, he says), then obviously the promises were for the poor.



Advent and repentance



Marcus Borg and John Dominic Crossan, in their excellent book, The First Christmas: What the Gospels Really Teach about Jesus's Birth, help us to approach Advent as the season of repentance and preparation, but with a deeper understanding of what those words mean. Rather than seeing repentance as contrition, sorrow for our sins, confession, and doing penance, Borg and Crossan describe it as a turning toward God, but in a way that stretches us, for "to repent" really means "'to go beyond the mind that you have'" so that we might see our lives, and the whole world, in a new way.



While this reading may tempt us toward anxiety about a sudden change brought on by God in a dramatic chain of destructive events, Borg and Crossan challenge us to hear the political message in this passage, a necessary dimension of repentance that has been "eclipsed" by our more comforting and comfortable reading of the gospel. Whether one celebrates or criticizes the American Empire, they claim that it is a reality, because 'empire is about the use of superior power – military, political, and economic – to shape the world as the empire sees fit. In this sense, we are the new Rome." A sobering thought, and not at all comforting.



Christmas past, present and future



This December, while we watch one more version (movie, animated television show or play) of the personal examination of conscience by Ebenezer Scrooge in Charles Dickens' story, "A Christmas Carol," we might also consider what Borg and Crossan call the "three tenses" of Christmas for the world: past, present, and future. Like Paul Scott Wilson, Borg and Crossan hear Jesus speaking about an end to injustice and suffering, about "the earth's transformation, not about its devastation." Jesus is promising that justice, peace and healing for which we all long.



Borg and Crossan helpfully articulate the different ways we understand such an eschatology and our role in it: is God going to act alone to transform the earth (and all we can do is wait and pray), or do we collaborate with God to bring this new earth to reality, "the world promised by Christmas"? Or do we ignore the whole question of transformation of the earth and just concentrate on our own personal, private salvation? "The Christmas stories," Borg and Crossan write, "are not about a spectacular series of miraculous events that happened in the past that we are to believe in for the sake of going to heaven. Rather, they are about God's passion, God's dream, for a transformed earth."



"Help is on the way!"



Perhaps the most artistic commentary on this text is provided by Kathy Beach-Verhey. In my office at the UCC Church House in Cleveland, I look up from my computer screen at Vincent van Gogh's magnificent painting, The Starry Night. It's always been one of my favorites, although I never connected it to this reading about end-times. But Beach-Verhey suggests that the "apocalyptic sky" in van Gogh's painting, with its strange and dramatic beauty, is a good image for this text, offering us "[f]rightening, bold, and beautiful glimpses of God" for our reflections here, at the beginning of Advent. It's an offer we might keep in our minds and hearts as we kneel before a gentle baby this Christmas, listening for the Stillspeaking God to call us into the birth of a new and transformed and beautiful world. Or, even better, as Eugene Peterson translates our Gospel text, we should be on our feet rather than our knees: "Stand tall with your heads held high. Help is on the way!" (The Message).

Thursday, November 19, 2015

An Honor


I

An Honor

Giving the Invocation and Benediction
At
Golden Gate National Cemetery
On

Veterans’ Day, 2015

By
Chaplain (Capt.) Edgar S. Welty, Jr.
31st. Reg’t United States Volunteers/America

Invocation

There are many ways to call on God.

 

If you are “Christian” you might call on the Father, Creator of Heaven and earth and his Son, Jesus Christ, who was sent to save us from our sins and became God “Incarnate” and through the power of Holy Spirit.

 

If you are Jewish, you might call on the God of Moses and “The Prophets” who choose the Hebrew nation as his own.

 

If you are Muslin, you might call on Allah as revealed by the prophet Mohammad.

 

However we call on God, according whichever faith tradition we may follow, let us ask a divine blessing on today’s proceedings.    Amen

 

Benediction

May God’s favor be upon you

and may the divine face shine upon you

and give you peace,

and may you go out into the world

to love the Lord your God,

with all your heart, with all your soul,

with all your mind.

and love your neighbor as yourself,

in the name of the Creator, Savior and Sustainer          Amen


Trickle-Down Economics Must Die.



Trickle-Down Economics Must Die. Long Live Grow-Up Economics

Posted: 11/18/2015 2:35 pm EST Updated: 11/18/2015 3:59 pm EST
INEQUALITY
"Economics, as it has been practiced in the last three decades, has been positively harmful for most people."  ~  Economist Ha-Joon Chang
For over thirty years we've treated something as fact which is actually false. Economists we trusted to know better didn't, and so people have suffered and continue to suffer. This pernicious economic myth is the idea that a rising yacht lifts all tides, or as more popularly described, "trickle-down economics." If we are to start running our economy in a way we could one day describe as notably less insane, we must finally come to see it for what it actually is.
2015-11-10-1447124160-9390340-ScottSantens1.jpeg
An Undead Idea
2015-10-30-1446236430-8409412-huffingtonpost_button1.pngThis belief -- that it's good economics to give a relatively greater and greater share of the pie to the top of the economic spectrum because the absolute sizes of all remaining shares will grow -- has taken some mortal hits in recent years by some major players, most notably even the OECD and IMF. In fact, it has now reached the point such that the idea being left alive in the minds of anyone makes it a good candidate as an extra in The Walking Dead.
Surveying the data, we'll start with Wall Street bonuses versus the economic multiplier effects of higher velocity money, go on to economic growth research in relation to distributional inequality, and end with what we know from global cash transfer evidence and the economic effects of billionaires. Let's burn this undead idea of inequality-driven economic growth with napalm and bury it in concrete, shall we?
2015-11-10-1447124376-733994-Scott2.png
This chart alone is perhaps enough to warrant a trip to the nearest window to shout out, "I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore!"
Wall Street earned twice as much in year-end bonuses alone as all full-time minimum wage workers combined earned the entire year.
What Mother Jones neglected to mention however is something that goes well beyond "fucked up," and something which did not go unmentioned in a piece by the Institute for Policy Studies after identical news the year before.
Every extra dollar going into the pockets of low-wage workers, standard economic multiplier models tell us, adds about $1.21 to the national economy. Every extra dollar going into the pockets of a high-income American, by contrast, only adds about 39 cents to the GDP. These pennies add up considerably on $26.7 billion in earnings. If the $26.7 billion Wall Streeters pulled in on bonuses in 2013 had gone to minimum wage workers instead, our GDP would have grown by about $32.3 billion, over triple the $10.4 billion boost expected from the Wall Street bonuses.
Yeah, you read that right. In 2013, by giving huge bonuses to those on Wall Street instead of low-wage workers, we actively prevented the creation of about $22 billion in additional national wealth. In 2014, we did the same thing, but to an even larger degree, preventing about $23 billion in additional national wealth that would have otherwise been created, had those billions in bonuses been distributed to low-income earners instead.
Year after year, we prevent new wealth creation. Why is this the case? What causes such a big difference in wealth creation, such that money at the bottom is over three times more effective at driving economic growth than money at the top?
Well, economists call it the "multiplier effect" whose origins are in what's called the "marginal propensity to consume." It describes how those with little money spend it quickly and those with lots of money don't.
Fast Money vs. Slow Money
Simply put, monetary exchanges have a frequency rate  --  a "velocity"   --  and this rate is far higher at the bottom than at the top. When you have a lot of money, each individual dollar, for the most part, just kind of sits around. Sure, it may be put to use eventually, but these dollars are more like gold coins inside Scrooge McDuck's bank vault. Occasionally they get swam in, but they're really just there to be counted and look shiny. Additionally, they can even get sent overseas to sit around in vaults elsewhere.
Looking at the latest money velocity charts and comparing today's numbers to the historical record is all one needs to see what happens to the overall rate of market exchanges when we start letting the top accumulate more and more of the total money supply.
2015-11-10-1447188931-6115473-Scottgraphimage1.png
Source: St. Louis Fed.
We are exchanging the dollars in our money supply more slowly than even during the Great Depression. The result has been an economy growing more and more tilted every day, such that even Disney itself, a company built on middle class consumption, is actively leaving it behind in an accelerating sprint towards that shrinking population with money to spend in greater and greater amounts.
The velocity of each dollar in our total money supply is now lower than has ever been recorded in all of U.S. history.
Meanwhile, that shrinking amount of money that's still accessible in hands at the bottom? It's changing hand after hand, and quickly. That dollar is no coin in a bank vault. It helps buy a gallon of milk, which pays a cashier, which helps buy a haircut, which pays a hair stylist, which helps buy a ticket to a movie, which pays a concession stand worker, which helps buy a dinner for two, and on and on it goes, like a fiery hot lava potato.
2015-11-10-1447191069-6036606-Scott4.png
Source. CRS
Section 2: Subtraction and Addition
It's not just that someone with little money has enough money to spend that expands an economy. The most effectual part is that a dollar is also removed from the hand overflowing with dollars. Who knew Robin Hood oversaw such an effective economic stimulus program? But that's how it works and also in a way that stabilizes the entire economy according to a new model built by Ricardo Reis and Alistair McKay of Columbia University and Boston University.
"It's the redistribution that has a lot of kick," Reis said in an interview with Bloomberg. "The usual argument for transfers is basically Keynesian. We find that has very low impact in our model."
According to Reis and McKay, there is no better way of creating a more stable economy than to expand tax-and-transfer programs that specifically reduce inequality, like food stamps and social insurance.
A healthy economy is not one of extreme inequality, but one where everyone has enough money to spend into it, to the point they can start saving what they don't need to spend.
When the only ones capable of making exchanges are a small percentage of the population, the entire economy suffers because the many are excluded for the benefit of the few, but this benefit too is an illusion. There is no real benefit. Pretending otherwise is like thinking that cutting off the blood in your body to everything except the brain is good for business. It's not. It's good for gangrene.
OECD Findings
In a December 2014 report titled, "Trends in Income Inequality and its Impact on Economic Growth," the OECD found that inequality slows economic growth.
2015-11-10-1447191939-7357792-Scott5.png
Source. OECD
"Rising inequality is estimated to have knocked more than 10 percentage points off growth in Mexico and New Zealand over the past two decades up to the Great Recession. In Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States, the cumulative growth rate would have been six to nine percentage points higher had income disparities not widened, but also in Sweden, Finland and Norway, although from low levels. On the other hand, greater equality helped increase GDP per capita in Spain, France and Ireland prior to the crisis.
One sentence from the report stands out in particular, as something absolutely vital to focus on to achieve strong economic growth.
The impact of inequality on growth stems from the gap between the bottom 40 percent with the rest of society, not just the poorest 10 percent. Anti-poverty programs will not be enough, says the OECD.
It is not enough to tax and transfer only from the top to the bottom.
Transfer recipients must include at least about half of the entire population. The incomes of the middle class must be increased alongside those living under or near the poverty line, and all of this entirely at the expense of the top. By not doing this, we all lose, even the rich.
Between 1990 and today, US GDP grew from $6 trillion to what is now almost $18 trillion. The OECD is saying that had we not allowed our inequality to grow alongside it, our GDP would have grown an extra trillion dollars. And had we reduced our inequality, our GDP would now likely be somewhere north of $20 trillion instead of $17.7 trillion.
But we didn't do that. We instead shoveled money hand over fist into the pockets of those with already overstuffed pockets, and to this day we continue to do so. However, this behavior is beginning to be questioned by even more growth experts than the OECD. The IMF is now asking them too.
IMF Findings
In June of 2015, the International Monetary Fund upped the ante with an even more damning report on the effects of income inequality on economic growth than the OECD.
2015-11-10-1447195969-9118338-ImageIMF.jpeg
Source: IMF
According to the IMF, increasing the share of the total pie of the top 20% by just 1% (by, say, throwing bonuses at them) decreases economic growth by 0.08 points. It actually damages the economy. Overall wealth decreases. On the other hand, increasing the share of the bottom 20% by the same 1%, increases economic growth by 0.38 points, that makes it five times more effective and in the direction we actually want. Similar growth increases are seen in decreasing amounts for the middle three quintiles, with 0.33 points, 0.27 points and 0.06 points respectively.
In other words, transferring money from the bottom to the top actually slows GDP. It erases national wealth. It shrinks the pie. Whereas doing the opposite -- transferring money from the top to the bottom -- is the equivalent of throwing Viagra at GDP. It quickly grows the pie. When the bottom 60% get a larger share, everyone greatly benefits, including the top 40%.
The OECD data points to redistributing from the top to the bottom 40%.
The IMF data points to redistributing from the top to the bottom 60%.
No data points to redistributing to the top from the bottom, which is  -- unfortunately for everyone  --  exactly what we've been doing for decades. Redistribution actively already exists, and it's in the wrong direction for GDP growth.
2015-11-10-1447196151-889095-Scottchartimage6.png
The United States: Taking from the working poor and middle classes to give to the rich for 40 years.
So this idea that we should ever let inequality increase because it grows the total pie is completely and utterly false. By letting inequality increase, the entire pie actually shrinks. If we want the pie to grow we need to shift some of that stagnant wealth of the top 20% over to the other quintiles, and the more we shift towards the bottom and middle, the faster the pie will grow for everyone.
"Policies that help to limit or reverse inequality may not only make societies less unfair, but also wealthier."  -  OECD, 2014
This is a huge reason, if not the best reason, for everyone to support the idea of universal basic income: increased economic growth that benefits everyone. By reducing the rate of wealth accumulation of the top 20% in a way that better distributes that income to everyone else, we see the potential to build national wealth at historic new rates.
A Big Economy
I've estimated before that the total additional cost required to give every adult citizen a basic income guarantee (BIG) of $1,000 per month and every citizen under eighteen $300 per month would be around $1.5 trillion after the elimination of expenses no longer required with a basic income. This is roughly 8.5% of GDP. (Note: the total cost of child poverty alone is 5.7% of GDP)
If that revenue is removed from the vaults of the top 20% where it is sitting stagnant and distributed to the bottom 60% (no need to alter the distribution for the 60-80% according to the OECD or IMF), that's about a 2.83% increase for each quintile combined with the growth from the 8.5% decrease in the 5th quintile. If these are then multiplied by the IMF numbers per 1% increase, the total combined result is a 3.45% growth estimate, for a new total GDP growth rate of potentially 6.44% with a universal basic income in place.
2015-11-18-1447870412-4297446-PATREONPATREONhuffingtonpost_buttoncopy.png
This may sound high, and admittedly quite wonkish, but I believe it's also likely we'll see second and third order effects along the lines of increased productivity, and wage increases through higher bargaining power, which would both result in potentially even larger increases to GDP growth with basic income than the IMF or OECD data points to.
Follow Scott Santens on Twitter: www.twitter.com/2noame

More:


Friday, November 13, 2015

A Wise Reign


Sunday, November 22
Reign of Christ Sunday
Focus Theme

A Wise Reign

Weekly Prayer
Almighty God, you remembered the oath you swore to David and so established a glorious realm of salvation through Jesus of Nazareth, his heir. Train our eyes to see your righteous rule, that, standing firmly in hope before the powers of this world, we may heed your voice and be constant in your truth. Amen.
Focus Scripture
John 18:33-37
Then Pilate entered the headquarters again, summoned Jesus, and asked him, "Are you the King of the Jews?" Jesus answered, "Do you ask this on your own, or did others tell you about me?" Pilate replied, "I am not a Jew, am I? Your own nation and the chief priests have handed you over to me. What have you done?" Jesus answered, "My kingdom is not from this world. If my kingdom were from this world, my followers would be fighting to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. But as it is, my kingdom is not from here." Pilate asked him, "So you are a king?" Jesus answered, "You say that I am a king. For this I was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone who belongs to the truth listens to my voice."
All Readings For This Sunday
2 Samuel 23:1-7
Psalm 132:1-12 [13-18]
Revelation 1:4b-8
John 18:33-37
Focus Questions
1. Where is the deepest fear in this scene between Jesus and Pilate?
2. What do you think is going on in Pilate's mind and heart?
3. Under what illusions are we living in our society? In the church?
4. Would observers recognize that Jesus Christ is "king" of our lives?
5. What does it mean to be "in the world" and yet belong to God?
Reflection by Kate Matthews (Huey)
Fear and belonging: these two words seem to run underneath all the talk of kingdoms and trials, glory and power, in the readings for this Reign of Christ Sunday (formerly, "Christ the King Sunday"). Before we even get to the readings, however, it's probably a good idea to spend some time taking a second, longer look at that title given to this last Sunday in the liturgical year. (Next Sunday, we'll begin a new liturgical year, Year C, and a new cycle of readings, beginning with the First Sunday of Advent.)
Words like king, kingdom, and kingship may sound far away in both time and place from the democratic societies in which many of us live today. Perhaps they sound patriarchal (or even sexist), and classist, and uncomfortably reminiscent of a time when the church was closely allied to the secular powers of the world, entwined with systems that produced horrors like slavery, violence fueled by anti-Semitism, and the execution of heretics and of women who were perceived to be "witches."
Jesus with a sword
I remember seeing a mural many years ago, in which a golden-robed and crowned Jesus Christ stands gloriously brandishing a great sword. That image would come to mind through the years whenever I heard pastors and worship planners decide to soft-pedal "Christ the King Sunday" in order not to offend modern people living in a nation where church and state are separate. However, it's possible, even as we acknowledge the regrettable historical manifestations of human kingship and their use in association with Jesus, to reclaim this Sunday as a celebration that combines the great themes of God's sovereignty in our lives and in the life of the world that God loves.
But first we have to deal with the fear, and with fear-less-ness as well. It seems that Jesus would have more reason to be fearful than Pilate, who appears to be in ultimate control, backed as he is by the mighty empire of Rome. However, if we read the longer narrative of Jesus' trial before Pilate, we get a sense of the governor's nervousness, as he agitatedly goes back and forth, in and out of his headquarters, summoning Jesus to be brought in for one more try at an interrogation that also goes back and forth, and on and on.
Fear as a tool
This nervousness is a good thing to keep in mind as we read this short passage, an excerpt from the longer interrogation and just one moment in Pilate's growing discomfort with the situation. Isn't the trial itself grounded in fear, if Pilate and the empire he represents act out of fear of the crowds (which have their own kind of power), and use fear itself as a tool for controlling those crowds? And yet Pilate seems worried about what to do with Jesus: is it possible that we can detect a bit of conscience in the Roman governor, if only for a brief moment in time?
No one knows what's in Pilate's heart or mind, but it's interesting to read the different perspectives offered by several scholars. Right after the end of this week's passage, Pilate poignantly asks, "What is truth?" in response to all of Jesus' words about it. His question sounds almost modern, or post-modern, and provides a dramatic moment in the dialogue. However, Robert Bryant reads contempt underneath the governor's words, while John J. Pilch finds Pilate "genuinely curious" about Jesus.
Follow the fear, not the money
In any case, the power equation must appear to onlookers as tilted in Pilate's favor, unless they're moved by the cool, calm manner in which Jesus faces every question. John Pilch characterizes his responses as "wisecracks": for example, Jesus suggests that Pilate may be a "gossip." We have to wonder just how long Pilate would tolerate such responses, of course. Charles Cousar makes the case that Pilate is torn between his "instincts" and the demands of his position of power. Does Pilate indeed have a sliver of a conscience, or is he simply calculating the best way to handle his fear? We've heard the saying, "Follow the money," but in this trial (and all that produced it), we might try following the fear.
The most common human response to fear is to run and hide, or to seek the power we need to protect ourselves: seeking power, keeping power, and using power (and sometimes even force) to secure one's safety and well-being – it really can exhaust a person. Power, however, enables one to protect one's turf and one's interests, and Pilate is in the habit of wielding the kind of power that uses soldiers and weapons, invasions and persecutions, to protect what Rome already has and seeks to expand.
Wrap yourself in the illusion of power
The trappings of power might reassure Pilate, but he's clearly unsettled by a different kind of power that he senses in this stranger from the hinterlands, standing before him. Cousar suggests that Pilate is a power broker whose power is really an "illusion." How does one respond, after all, to a "threat" presented by a "humble" prophet who observes that he doesn't need troops or weapons because he doesn't have that kind of kingdom to protect? His power base doesn't lie in how many soldiers he commands and the brute force he can exert or even the violent uprising he might inspire; on the contrary, he knows well that his power comes from God.
If Pilate even had a clue about this, how could he respond to that kind of challenge? Cousar suggests that Pilate needs some serious "dis-illusionment," to be stripped of the illusions he maintains about his own importance and power in the world and in his own life. No wonder many of the commentators suggest that Pilate is the one on trial here.
A little dis-illusionment is a good thing
Would most of us benefit from a degree of "dis-illusionment" ourselves? Do we carry, and act out of, deep illusions about who Jesus really is in our lives and in the life of the world? First, do you think of Jesus Christ as "king" of your life, and if so, what does that mean? (One might also ask, "If Jesus Christ is not king of your life, who or what is?" Or, perhaps, "If Jesus Christ is not king of your life, what word would you use to describe him?")
Walter Brueggemann hears in John's Gospel a great legal argument over who Jesus really is: Jesus isn't the one on trial today, but each one of us is called to testify and perhaps, to be on trial ourselves. What do we really say, and believe, about this Jesus? Scott Black Johnston reminds us that the reign of Jesus isn't over territory or peoples but over the "truth to which people belong." Do we "belong" to this truth? Would people recognize that we do? Brueggemann says that we're not dealing with intellectual or theoretical things here, but with "a way of being in the world in suffering and hope, so radical and so raw that we can scarcely entertain it." Could people say that about the way we live our lives, as disciples of Jesus?
Questions of ultimate allegiance
What does it mean to be "in the world" when we belong to God? Of course, it means our ultimate allegiance and loyalty – and our love and devotion – given to God rather than any other person, thing, or power that tries to claim primacy over God. This kind of love for God is the opposite of idolatry; are humans driven to idols out of fear, out of wanting to belong to something outside themselves?
And yet we do belong to a king whose heart is so tender that we might better see him as a good and loving shepherd who calls us to follow; we can only hope that we'll recognize his voice and respond, as the blind man did, and the sheep, and Lazarus, and Mary Magdalene, later, in the garden. As Eugene Peterson so beautifully translates the words of Jesus in The Message, "Everyone who cares for truth, who has any feeling for the truth, recognizes my voice." The truth is something we have a feeling for, a longing for, and we hope that the powers-that-be don't block our way to that truth.
Facing the truth about ourselves, gently
There is the truth about Jesus, and then there's the truth about ourselves that we must face. Robert Bryant reminds us that the gentle shepherd-king of our lives calls us to examine our lives carefully and honestly, as Pilate was apparently unable to do. The role of the church in our lives is one important way that a loving God helps us to carry on this lifelong self-examination, this thoughtful and prayerful self-awareness that should not lead to self-absorption or obsessive guilt. Instead, the church offers a place of nurture and honest but loving encouragement to grow deeper in our faith, to immerse ourselves more deeply in the grace of God, to listen more closely to the call of the Stillspeaking God in each of our lives.
Pete Peery touches on the heart of things when he reflects on the fear people feel in their lives, the feeling of being trapped, in spite of, or perhaps because of, an excess of material possessions, or their place in society, their security: are they not truly free after all to be their true selves, to share their vulnerability, their deepest hopes and fears? Ironically, Jesus offers this same invitation to Pilate himself, to free himself from his fear and his need for power and security, "to utter the truth of his own life," like the woman at the well back in chapter four. The woman at the well (who had so little to lose) experienced her life transformed, but Pilate, we suspect, will remain trapped by his worldly power (he has so much to lose, it seems). The woman at the well could hear the gentle shepherd's voice, because other things (the trumpets, the advisors, the sound of marching feet?) were not drowning it out.
Telling the truth about Jesus
Of course, it is often difficult for the church itself to carry on this sort of self-examination, let alone facilitate that process for the individual member. Undoubtedly that inability played a huge role in the historical horrors mentioned earlier in this reflection, but even our mainline congregations, especially the ones that appear to be safe and stable and somewhat reasonably removed from the abuses of the past, struggle with the freedom and honesty to tell the truth about Jesus and who (and how) Jesus calls us to be the Body of Christ in the world.
Despite our claims of allegiance to Jesus Christ, Pete Peery asks whether the challenges of loss - of memberships, resources and influence - might not tempt the church to shape its message and mission in ways to preserve all three rather than being true to the challenge and risk of gospel living. It's so much easier to examine and judge the church of several hundred years ago than it is to face the truth of our own life as the church today.
Not of this world but definitely in it
And that question relates to the larger question of what it means to be the church – the Body of Christ – in the world today. On this Reign of Christ Sunday, we have to ask how the "not-of-this-world" reign of Jesus Christ relates to the very-much-this-world situation in which we live. When we look around at the poverty, injustice, and suffering experienced by so many of God's children precisely because some have way too much while too many have way too little, aren't we directly contradicting Israel's wilderness experience when "the one who had much did not have too much, and the one who had little did not have too little" (2 Cor 8:15) or the early church's practice of sharing all things in common (Acts 2:44)? Are we in fact faithful to God's Word in the way we arrange and live our lives, individually and communally?
This trial of Jesus is in the shadow of Good Friday, and Good Friday continues to be experienced by many people over and over again, today, by starving children and people with cancer but no health insurance and homeless people in the approaching winter and refugees who have lost their homeland and people with HIV/AIDS and women afraid in their own homes. What is the responsibility of the preacher on this Sunday morning, in the face of such suffering by so many of God's children? Is this a time for triumph, or a time for hope? How do we preach hope, and yet challenge our hearers, and ourselves, to living as if Jesus reigns over our lives, day in and day out, not just during our time in church?
Learning "to call things by their right name"
We don't experience Christ's reign all on our own, of course: we are really part of something bigger than our little selves, when we live "under" the reign of Christ. This shared experience makes us belong to one another and to God, who invites us into this community and helps us on our way. This is the place where we get to know who we are as followers of Jesus, and who we are together, as a community of faith. Rodger Y. Nishioka is one of several scholars who emphasize the communal experience, the "belonging" part of this Reign of Christ celebration. This message is counter-cultural in the individualism-soaked culture we live in, but if offers us great hope, and guidance as well.
We have come to the end of another liturgical year, an appropriate time, Dianne Bergant writes, to observe Reign of Christ Sunday. After all, everything we claim as people of faith comes to a fitting conclusion here, with Christ as the focal point, reigning over all creation in goodness and truth, a "ruler" we can approach without fear, knowing that we belong to this gentle and loving shepherd-king who leads us, and cares for us, and calls us home, where we belong. Truly, there is no need for fear.
In the meantime, living in what Walter Brueggemann calls "a seduced world" (one thinks of the way a seduced world wanders away, like a lost sheep), we pray that we might find the right words - and actions - to express the truth of our lives and the truth of who Jesus Christ is in our lives. Brueggemann's prayer is a fitting way to end one year, and to begin a new one: "Give us courage to depart the pretend world of euphemism, to call things by their right name, to use things for their right use, to love our neighbor as you love us" (His book of prayers and reflections is excellent: "Ours is a seduced world" in Awed to Heaven, Rooted to Earth).
A preaching version of this commentary (with book titles) can be found at www.ucc.org/worship/samuel.
The Rev. Kathryn Matthews (Huey) serves as dean of Amistad Chapel at the national offices of the United Church of Christ in Cleveland, Ohio (https://www.facebook.com/AmistadChapel).
You're invited to share your reflections on this text on our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/SermonSeeds.
For further reflection
Stephen Vincent Benét, 20th century
"We thought, because we had power, we had wisdom."
William E. Gladstone, 19th century
"We look forward to the time when the Power of Love will replace the Love of Power. Then will our world know the blessings of peace."
Amy Tan, 20th century
"You see what power is--holding someone else's fear in your hand and showing it to them!"
Aung San Suu Kyi, Freedom from Fear, 21st century
"It is not power that corrupts but fear. Fear of losing power corrupts those who wield it and fear of the scourge of power corrupts those who are subject to it."
C.S. Lewis (referring to Aslan, the Lion, in The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe), 20th century
"He's not safe, but he's good."
Elizabeth Gilbert (in Eat, Pray, Love), 21st century
"I met an old lady once, almost a hundred years old, and she told me, 'There are only two questions that human beings have ever fought over, all through history. How much do you love me? And Who's in charge?'"