Sunday, October 18, 2015

Courage for Community


Courage for Community

Sunday, September 27
Eighteenth Sunday after Pentecost

Focus Theme
Courage for Community

Weekly Prayer
O God, our guide and help in alien and contentious places: as Esther worked courageously for the deliverance of your people, strengthen us to confront the oppressor and free the oppressed, so that all people may know the justice and unity of your realm. Amen.

Focus Scripture
Esther 7:1-6, 9-10; 9:20-22

So the king and Haman went in to feast with Queen Esther. On the second day, as they were drinking wine, the king again said to Esther, "What is your petition, Queen Esther? It shall be granted you. And what is your request? Even to the half of my kingdom, it shall be fulfilled." Then Queen Esther answered, "If I have won your favor, O king, and if it pleases the king, let my life be given me--that is my petition--and the lives of my people--that is my request. For we have been sold, I and my people, to be destroyed, to be killed, and to be annihilated. If we had been sold merely as slaves, men and women, I would have held my peace; but no enemy can compensate for this damage to the king." Then King Ahasuerus said to Queen Esther, "Who is he, and where is he, who has presumed to do this?" Esther said, "A foe and enemy, this wicked Haman!" Then Haman was terrified before the king and the queen.

Then Harbona, one of the eunuchs in attendance on the king, said, "Look, the very gallows that Haman has prepared for Mordecai, whose word saved the king, stands at Haman's house, fifty cubits high." And the king said, "Hang him on that." So they hanged Haman on the gallows that he had prepared for Mordecai. Then the anger of the king abated.

Mordecai recorded these things, and sent letters to all the Jews who were in all the provinces of King Ahasuerus, both near and far, enjoining them that they should keep the fourteenth day of the month Adar and also the fifteenth day of the same month, year by year, as the days on which the Jews gained relief from their enemies, and as the month that had been turned for them from sorrow into gladness and from mourning into a holiday; that they should make them days of feasting and gladness, days for sending gifts of food to one another and presents to the poor.

All readings for this Sunday
Esther 7:1-6, 9-10; 9:20-22
Psalm 124
James 5:13-20
Mark 9:38-50

Focus Questions

1. What reversals of fortune have you witnessed in your life?

2. What do you believe that God is calling you to do "in such a time as this"? How do you recognize God's call?

3. What do you think Esther meant when she said, "If I perish, I perish?"

4. How can we remain who we are as followers of Jesus in a culture that preaches very different values?

5. Why does community require courage?

Reflection by Kate Matthews (Huey)

It's unusual enough that a book of the Bible bears the name of a woman; it's even more unusual that a book from the Holy Scriptures never mentions God. There are plenty of things about the Book of Esther that make it a fascinating read, so the short excerpts provided this week by the lectionary hardly do justice to this rich and complex story. The Book of Esther explains the origins of the Jewish Feast of Purim, a celebration with feasting, drinking, and sharing gifts, not just with one another but also, of course, remembering the poor. Purim is not one of the major feasts of Judaism, but Jewish writers recount vivid childhood memories of hearing the story of Esther read aloud and of play-acting the roles of its main characters. As adults, they continue to enjoy this festive commemoration of their people's deliverance long ago from death at the hands of Haman, the wicked advisor to the Persian king.

The short story of Esther is full of all sorts of things we find in the most entertaining movies: irony and intrigue, a thickening plot, clever wits and evil villains, royal splendor and a weak ruler, and, of course, the hero who rises to the challenge and saves the day. Only this time, the hero is a heroine, and not at all a likely one. We read, for example, in the first chapter, about the earlier queen, Vashti, who stood up to the king and paid the price for her disobedience: the king's legal experts and sages were appalled that her actions might cause the women of the kingdom to "look with contempt on their husbands," too (1:17). No wonder that Vashti was banished from the king's presence, and no wonder that feminist commentators enthusiastically see her as a little-known heroine in the story. On the other hand, they seem uncertain about what to do with Esther, who goes about things in a somewhat different way. Esther uses her power for good, and her place for the protection of her people, even though she risks her own life by "coming out" as one of them. For this, we say that she had "Courage for Community."

In a Bible full of male prophets and priests, military leaders and kings, it's refreshing to have a courageous heroine at the center of the story, even if she has to work the system, or go against it, as women have done for so long in order to do what needs to be done (think, for example, of the midwives in the Exodus story of saving the infant Moses). Esther's power does not come from her but derives from her husband, the king of Persia. However, instead of being unnamed, or relegated to the margins (from which women still manage to play key roles in biblical narratives), Esther is at the center of the book that bears her name. Ironically, the story still contains bloodbaths of vengeance and executions of enemies that strike our ears harshly, especially at the end, when Esther participates in exacting vengeance. Still, this is a tale of survival in the face of overwhelming power: Esther finds herself, Sidnie White Crawford writes, "locked in a life-and-death struggle not of her own making." That simple phrase is good for us to keep in mind when we read that the Jews were allowed to "lay hands on those who had sought their ruin" (9:2).

Adding what isn't there

Scholars note in the Book of Esther the absence not only of God's name but of prayer, and the Law, and most of the other practices we associate with observant Judaism. (Even the fasting that Esther calls for, Crawford observes, "is not explicitly directed by God and seems to have no purpose beyond communal solidarity.") These omissions disturbed ancient writers so much that they later added 107 more verses to the original Hebrew text, but these Greek "Additions to Esther" are part of the Apocrypha, a collection of books not considered canonical by Judaism or Protestant Christianity, although the Roman Catholic Church does give them such authority. The Additions are full of prayer and talk of God, and make the story of Esther seem more religiously appropriate.

However, we might experience the Book of Esther as a kind of "Where's Waldo?" exercise; looking at the entire story closely, we know God is there even if that isn't obvious at first glance. Throughout the story (which reflects, in many ways, the larger story of Israel), God provides and protects. That is, Providence runs through the story as a thread of evidence pointing to God's abiding presence with God's people. The New Oxford Annotated Bible finds God at the center of this drama, if not on center stage, but able to accomplish a lot while "standing in the wings, following the drama and arranging the props for a successful resolution of the playÖ.Providence can be relied upon to reverse the ill-fortunes that beset individuals or the nation--provided that such leaders and their followers do their part, acting wisely and courageously."

God works through human beings

Unlike several other books of the Bible (for example, Daniel or Exodus), God's deliverance of the people in this Book of Esther is not accomplished through amazing, miraculous events but through the actions of flawed but courageous human beings who were probably never sure they were doing the right thing. And yet, as Ted Kennedy said at the funeral of his deceased brother, Robert, they "saw wrong and tried to right it." It isn't always easy, however, to know how to go about righting wrongs, and we're not always confident that we're the ones who are called to do so, at least in a particular situation, and we're often unsure about how to proceed. The most familiar line from Esther, "for such a time as this" (4:14b), comes from Mordecai's message urging her to step out of her safety zone and to consider that she was made queen expressly for this moment when she could save her people. Again, Sidnie White Crawford writes that humans are limited in their knowledge of God's purposes and their own role in them, but "must act, with profound hope that they are thereby participating in the divine scheme."

While some feminist commentators have turned away from Esther, others have found deep meaning in her story. Perhaps Esther was, at first, just one more young girl trying to survive by using whatever gifts she has, including her great beauty. But we learn that Esther has many more gifts that are called forth by this crisis. In a remarkable show of courage, she seems to take a leap toward her responsibility "in such a time as this," and she talks herself out of her anxiety: "If I perish, I perish," she says (4:16b), and we wonder what she means. Is her life meaningless in the face of thousands dying? Does she turn herself over to Providence? Does she feel that a failure to act that brings on the destruction of her people, even if she herself survives because of her position as queen, would make life unbearable?

In any case, like so many women before and since, she has to work the patriarchal system to the benefit of her people, for even as queen she is marginalized and limited in her power. She has to depend on "The Man" of the story, the weak and malleable king. In this regard, Esther is like many women throughout history, Crawford writes, who know how to maneuver in a male-dominated world in order to accomplish what needs to happen, and this provides inspiration and "a model" for the people of Israel, who struggle, from below, powerless in the land of exile. Perhaps Crawford recognizes in Esther a wisdom and strength and courage that remind her of another woman, for she dedicates her commentary to her mother, "also a heroine."

A community that remembers who they are

It may be that the story of Esther omits mention of the core practices and institutions of Judaism precisely in order to paint a picture of how much the Jewish community had been assimilated into the Persian empire around them. Indeed, it was probably written, three or four centuries before Christ, for the very people it describes, Jews residing in the Persian Empire, in the diaspora (the scattered Jews living outside Israel, often because of exile and other calamities). Wouldn't it be easy, under such circumstances, to forget who you are? One of the many good effects of spiritual practices in any faith is the way they remind us of who we are, and to Whom we belong.

Kenneth H. Carter, Jr., calls us to reflect on the situation of the Jews in Persia during the time of Esther, and, before judging them, to compare their assimilation to our own. Yes, they had adapted to some extent to the culture surrounding them in exile (although, in 3:8, Haman does tell the king that the Jews obey their own laws; that doesn't sound so much like full assimilation). However, Carter challenges North American Christians' own ways of fitting in with the surrounding culture and its "patriotic observances, sporting championships, musical festivals, celebrity obsessions, and economic forecasts." How do we establish and nurture a sense of identity, and what is our primary identity: as sports fans, shoppers, and shrewd financial planners, or as disciples of Jesus and children of God? Carter suggests that the liturgical year of the church might offer a different kind of "rhythm," a different pattern, a different set of values for our lives that will remind us that we belong to God, and we follow Jesus.

To what values have we adapted?

If Carter's challenge makes us at all uncomfortable, might that discomfort reflect our own degree of assimilation and how much we have forgotten that we follow a Teacher who taught us to love our enemies, turn the other cheek, and lay down our lives for one another? A Teacher who observed how difficult it is for a rich person to enter heaven, and encouraged the earnestly religious to "sell everything and give it to the poor"? We've somehow managed to let ourselves feel quite at home with very different values, even as we claim to follow Jesus. How many of us Christians find a way to justify any number of contradictions to the teachings of Jesus? Suddenly this colorful little story of vengeance and intrigue becomes much more about us than we might like to think.

For so long, Christendom has given Western Christians (that would be us) a sense of place and privilege that is now fading, and that may not be so bad. Perhaps now we can, in our shared life, think about what it really means to be Christians, and to subvert and dissent from every power that would exterminate the good news that we bear. We can learn, obviously, from the long history of the Jews, who live in the tension between what is, and what they hope and imagine they might be. Walter Brueggemann recalls the words of Jacob Neusner: "We are more than we seem, other than we appear to be."

In fact, a most helpful commentary on this passage is found in Brueggemann's book, An Introduction to the Old Testament: The Canon and Christian Imagination, which unlocks the richness of the text for us in the Christian church today. Like many discussions by scholars such as John Dominic Crossan about Paul's writings being set in the midst of the Roman empire and contrasting Christian discipleship with the values of the empire, Brueggemann focuses on this story's setting, whether historical or fictional, in the midst of the Persian empire. It doesn't matter, he says, whether the empire was Persian or Greek--and we might say Roman or modern--we still have to deal with the powers-that-be over our lives.

Living in the empire in any age

While we may seem far away in place and time and, to an extent, in circumstance, we share the ancient Jewish longing to be a faithful people in the midst of values and pressures foreign to who we are. How then can we, like those ancient Jews, live where we live, not withdrawing into a separate culture, and yet remain distinctly true to who we are and what we believe, true to the One to whom we belong?

Another theme in this little story full of themes is that of the reversal of fortunes. In yet another of many biblical reversals of fortune, the seventy-five-foot-high scaffold prepared for Mordecai is used, ironically, to execute the mortal enemy of his own, and Esther's, people. The people without hope or power suddenly have both power and hope. Fear and sorrow turn into joy, and prompt the establishment of a regular celebration that expresses the sheer relief of being delivered from death, narrowly, and at the very last minute. Even that celebration is decreed by Mordecai, who went from being a condemned man to being the king's trusted right hand man.

Reading in the shadow of the Holocaust and the pogroms

How can we read this story without remembering the Holocaust of our modern history, only seventy years ago? When Haman works his evil ways, he uses oddly, painfully familiar words to do what advisors to despots have done for centuries, describing the Jews in a way that bothers the surrounding culture by being "different": "There is a certain people scattered and separated among the peoples in all the provinces of your kingdom; their laws are different from those of every other people, and they do not keep the king's laws, so that it is not appropriate for the king to tolerate them. If it pleases the king, let a decree be issued for their destruction" (3:8-9a). Haman, of course, is most incensed by Mordecai's (possibly religious) refusal to bow to him. That anger sets the story in motion. What angers, misunderstandings, fears and prejudices have set in motion similar purges and orders of destruction in our own time, or made individuals feel somehow justified in taking matters into their own hands? This is not just a story of "long ago and faraway," but a warning to us, in every age. This Sunday is also American Indian Ministry Sunday, and the painful echoes of this story in the history of our own country are hard to miss and provide more material for reflection by the church on this text.

What then is the Stillspeaking God saying to us today, in such a time as this, through the story of Esther? Karen Jobes claims that this story is ours, too, for we also trust in a God who has delivered us from death, a deliverance we recall as a resurrection people who in turn share our joy with the world around us by acts of generosity and compassion. Next Sunday, on World Communion Sunday, our churches, like our Hebrew ancestors in faith, will hold a day "of feasting and gladness," a day to break bread, share the cup, and remember God's works and God's promises from of old. Within that same verse is a reminder to send "gifts of food to one another and presents to the poor"; as we come to the table on that great day, will we too remember those who are hungry, and make sure we share with them, too, as our Teacher instructed us? Like Esther, are we speaking on their behalf and using the power we have for their good as much as our own, no matter the cost? Do we, indeed, have courage for community, and not just for ourselves?

An unnamed God can still be known

A beautiful line of commentary on this text comes from H. James Hopkins, who observes the power in this story, "the hope that though God is not named, God can still be known." In stories and places and experiences that are not explicitly religious, the Stillspeaking God finds ways to reach us, and to show us that God can be known, and heard, and trusted with our lives and the lives of those we love. It is ours to step out in faith, courageously, on behalf of our community, and to say with Esther, in those supplementary verses in Additions to Esther, where she does indeed pray: "Save me from my fear" (14:19b, Addition C). Save us, indeed, from our fear.

A preaching version of this commentary (with book titles) can be found at www.ucc.org/worship/samuel.

The Rev. Kathryn Matthews (Huey) serves as dean of Amistad Chapel at the national offices of the United Church of Christ in Cleveland, Ohio (https://www.facebook.com/AmistadChapel).

You're invited to share your reflections on this text on our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/SermonSeeds.

For further reflection

Harriet Beecher Stowe, 19th century
"All serious daring starts from within."

Eleanor Roosevelt, 20th century
"You must do the thing you think you cannot do."

Marian Wright Edelman, 21st century
"Whoever said anybody has a right to give up?"

Nora Ephron, 21st century
"Above all, be the heroine of your life, not the victim."

Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice, 19th century
"There is a stubbornness about me that never can bear to be frightened at the will of others. My courage always rises at every attempt to intimidate me."

Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird
"'I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand. It's when you know you're licked before you begin, but you begin anyway and see it through no matter what.'" (Atticus Finch)

Anaïs Nin, 20th century
"Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage."

Audre Lorde, 20th century
"When I dare to be powerful, to use my strength in the service of my vision, then it becomes less and less important whether I am afraid."

About Weekly Seeds

Weekly Seeds is a United Church of Christ resource for Bible study based on the readings of the "Lectionary," a plan for weekly Bible readings in public worship used in Protestant, Anglican and Roman Catholic churches throughout the world. When we pray with and study the Bible using the Lectionary, we are praying and studying with millions of others.

You're welcome to use this resource in your congregation's Bible study groups.

Weekly Seeds is a resource of Local Church Ministries of the United Church of Christ. Bible texts are from the New Revised Standard Version, © 1989 Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Prayer is from The Revised Common Lectionary ©1992 Consultation on Common Texts. Used by permission.

Section Menu

New Sacred - A United Church of Christ Blog

Saturday, October 17, 2015

Take Heart

Take Heart

Sunday, October 25
Twenty-second Sunday after Pentecost
Focus Theme
Take Heart
Weekly Prayer
O Jesus Christ, teacher and healer, you heard the cry of the blind beggar when others would have silenced him. Teach us to be attentive to the voices others ignore, that we might respond through the power of the Spirit to heal the afflicted and to welcome the abandoned for your sake and the sake of the gospel. Amen.
Focus Scripture
Mark 10:46-52
They came to Jericho. As he and his disciples and a large crowd were leaving Jericho, Bartimaeus son of Timaeus, a blind beggar, was sitting by the roadside. When he heard that it was Jesus of Nazareth, he began to shout out and say, "Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!" Many sternly ordered him to be quiet, but he cried out even more loudly, "Son of David, have mercy on me!" Jesus stood still and said, "Call him here." And they called the blind man, saying to him, "Take heart; get up, he is calling you." So throwing off his cloak, he sprang up and came to Jesus. Then Jesus said to him, "What do you want me to do for you?" The blind man said to him, "My teacher, let me see again." Jesus said to him, "Go; your faith has made you well." Immediately he regained his sight and followed him on the way.
All Readings For This Sunday
Job 42:1-6, 10-17
Psalm 34:1-8 [19-22]
Hebrews 7:23-28
Mark 10:46-52
Focus Questions
1. What are the things that keep us from perceiving God at work in our lives?
2. What is the connection between healing and faith?
3. How do you think James and John felt as they heard Jesus ask the same question of Bartimaeus that he had asked them?
4. How much time do we spend either jockeying for position, or blocking the path of healing for those in need?
5. What would it look and feel like for the church to "take heart"?
Reflection by Kate Matthews (Huey)
At first glance, or taken out of context, this story about a blind beggar having his sight restored may appear to be simply another miracle story in the ministry of Jesus the healer. Encountering it within the larger narrative, however, we hear more clearly how God is speaking to our hearts today through this simple story of mercy, healing, and faith. Jesus and the disciples are approaching the end of their travels. They're at Jericho, on the edge of Jerusalem, on the edge of suffering and death for Jesus. As they've traveled along, the disciples have been busy figuring out where they want to sit when their dreams of triumph and success come to realization. Somehow, much of what has gone before, much of what Jesus has said and done, much of who Jesus is, has gone right past them; they have failed to see what was right in front of them.
The cluelessness of the disciples is a theme one perceives when reading the short Gospel of Mark (the oldest of the four Gospels) from beginning to end, a helpful exercise for feeling its movement and hearing its message more clearly. Not long after the disciples have been bickering over their places in glory, a blind man by the side of the road, hindered rather than helped by those around him, instantly recognizes Jesus for who he is. Not long after Jesus tells his followers that the last shall be first in his way of doing things, the disciples don't seem to object to a beggar being pushed to the edge of the scene, to the end of the line of people waiting to receive mercy from Jesus: Cynthia Jarvis observes that not one of the disciples speaks up for Bartimaeus when the crowd hushes him. We wonder, is anyone paying attention here?
Trouble brewing and a dangerous ministry
The setting for this healing story is important, despite Mark's rather odd, even abrupt account: "They came to Jericho. As he and his disciples and a large crowd were leaving Jericho…" (10:46a). We're not told what happened while Jesus and his disciples were in Jericho, but we could safely assume that Jesus' words and works were as dramatic, as compelling, as his past teachings and healings, or there wouldn't be a large crowd following him out of town. Just outside Jericho is a good place for an impressive and important event: André Resner, Jr., reminds us that this was the same place where God worked an earlier miracle, in the story about Joshua and the walls that came tumbling down.
Perhaps that miracle is a promising sign of what's about to happen. But Megan McKenna adds contemporary details about Jericho, describing it as a dangerous, even violent, place, filled with bandits but also with those who were fighting the Roman Empire. Mark has provided these last ten chapters as a prelude to the long and central account of Jesus' passion and death in Jerusalem, another place of intrigue and revolutionary groups seething with anger at Rome. Jesus' journey, then, was not a sudden departure from peaceful preaching in the countryside to the wild and dangerous ways of the city. There has been trouble brewing for some time now, and not just in Jerusalem.
Inspiring a blessing
Here, then, on the outer edge of a significant and turbulent city, we witness an even more significant and graced event. Despite the crowds that try to hush him, Bartimaeus cries out even more loudly. Lincoln Galloway writes that Bartimaeus sees himself, of course, as much more than simply "a blind man," and he resists the disciples' attempts to dismiss him or to speak for Jesus in this situation. Bartimaeus is an agent in the story because his "persistence," unlike the disciples' impatience, inspires "a wave of mercy, blessing, and change."
Don't we often define a person by some characteristic, by an adjective, rather than recognizing them as children of God, just like everyone else? Fortunately, unlike many others in the Gospels (especially women), Bartimaeus is actually named. In a way, it seems to give him more individuality, more personality. Isn't it nicely symmetrical that his name identifies him as someone's son, "the son of Timaeus," since he addresses Jesus as "son of David"?
Recognizing David's heir
While most scholars acknowledge the symmetry of two stories of men being restored to sight that bracket the long teachings about discipleship for the struggling, clueless followers of Jesus, they also find great significance in that title Bartimaeus uses in addressing Jesus. The crowd may describe Jesus by his birthplace, Nazareth, but Bartimaeus knows better who Jesus is, and how to describe him: not only as King David's descendant (and, in a way, his heir), but also as the long-awaited Messiah, for whom his people hoped and waited. A.K.M. Adam actually finds this title, "Son of David," a more important factor in this story than the man's physical disability.
Bartimaeus introduces this new recognition, this new perception of Jesus by acknowledging him as a descendant of both David and Solomon, who is known, David Watson notes, for his generosity and his healing powers. The very next thing that happens in Mark's Gospel is the entry into Jerusalem, when the crowds greet Jesus' arrival with the words, "Blessed is the coming kingdom of our ancestor David!" (11:10a). Surely, then, this is no accidental introduction of the title, "Son of David," and Mark's timing is excellent.
Asking from the margins
Jesus, of course, notices the man on the margins and hears his cry for help. Ironically, he asks the man the same question he asked James and John, when their minds were on their own power and glory. From the margins, Bartimaeus not only knows what to ask for, he also grasps more fully who this man is who stands before him, and shows the insider-disciples how they should have acted themselves. Remember the rich man two weeks ago who could not give up everything and follow Jesus? While Bartimaeus doesn't possess much, the little that he has, his humble cloak, is something that he needs to survive, and casting it aside is a sign of his complete trust, his whole-life faith in Jesus. He knows that he won't need it again; he's confident that he won't be returning to his spot by the side of the road, begging in order to live. Resner describes this beautifully: "Faith sits, leaning forward, ready to leap at the opportunity to answer God's call...."
Jesus at the end of his travels, and his healing ministry as well, as Mark tells the story. This is the last account of a healing in Mark, and it goes much more easily than the last time Jesus healed a blind man (8:22). This time, Jesus restores sight with just a word, and frees the man, a beggar formerly consigned to sitting by the side of the road, the margins of all that went on around him; Jesus tells him, "go on your way." Ironically, the man's response is not to "go" but to "follow," an interesting contrast to Jesus' invitation earlier in the same chapter to the rich man, to "come, follow me."
A story of call and response
In fact, many scholars claim this is just as much a call story as a healing one. One man, the rich one, is explicitly invited to let go of what holds him back, and to follow Jesus, but he declines, with great sadness. The other man, poor but in a deeper sense, spiritually rich, is freed of what holds him down or keeps him out, and he decides, presumably with great joy and gratitude, to "come, follow" Jesus, even on the way to the suffering and death that will come before the glory. An interesting contrast in invitation and acceptance! Bartimaeus chooses to follow what he has spiritually embraced, this teacher Jesus, on the way, no longer sitting alone by the side of the road but traveling on it with a band of companions. In Mark's Gospel, he is the only one of the people healed by Jesus who then followed him on that way, according to A.K.M. Adam. Again, the timing of this incident can not be accidental.
A story of servanthood, between the lines
Between the lines of this story is the theme of servanthood. Jesus asks Bartimaeus the same haunting question he earlier asked the disciples, "What is it that you want me to do for you?" (v. 51). The answer could have been the same in both cases, for the disciples really needed help with recognizing the truth standing right before them, and where it would lead them. Instead of "Give us glory," they could have said, "Give us hearts to see and follow." That would take a miracle, too, it seems: the miracle of Resurrection, followed by Pentecost. The disciples, in their own time, would have to travel the road to the cross, too. Jesus, living out the things he's been teaching his followers about true discipleship, "serves" the needs of a man on the margins, and the disciples, eventually, will "get it," too, that is, except for one.
Where are the places and situations in your own life where God is at work, even if you don't recognize it? What is the connection between healing and faith? What are the things that keep us from perceiving the presence of God or God at work in our lives? Would we recognize Jesus if we encountered him? "When Bartimaeus adds 'son of David' to his naming of Jesus, you get the impression that he sees quite a lot for a blind man," Richard Swanson observes. It makes one wonder about the people on the margins of our churches and our communities who grasp the truth more than we in the center of church life do. How much time do we spend either jockeying for position, or blocking the path of healing for those in need?
Whom are we missing?
Megan McKenna suggests that we check our own perception and attention, to consider whom we might not be acknowledging, or on whom we might prefer not to focus, or whose voices we may be silencing, in faraway lands and right under our noses, or better, "under our radar." Out of sight, out of mind, and despite our modern communications and news reports, we can distract ourselves with the "more important" matters of our own lives.
Ironically, the things that keep us busiest may actually be what we think are marks of faithfulness, the busy-ness of church and family life, and our own good behavior. Walter Brueggemann observes that the church may have "lost its way" because it's preoccupied with "rules...morality...members and dollars...culture wars and church splits...[and]imposing our way on others in order to get everyone in the right on morality or doctrine or piety or liturgy…all as though we have not received mercy." I'm reminded of words I saw recently by Richard Rohr: "We clergy became angry guards instead of happy guides, low level policemen instead of proclaimers of a Great Gift and Surprise both perfectly hidden and perfectly revealed at the heart of all creation." What would it look and feel like for the church to "take heart," as Jesus commanded Bartimaeus?
Faith as a matter of life and death
Cynthia Jarvis challenges Christians who are secure and even comfortable to consider "those for whom faith is a matter of life and death"; we might say that they, like Bartimaeus, have nothing to lose and everything to gain. Bartimaeus didn't care what people thought, and didn't let anything deter him from reaching Jesus. For him, following Jesus wasn't just a good idea, a fad, or a nice self-improvement program. It wasn't "the thing to do," or a good habit to form. For Bartimaeus, as for so many others, trusting that Jesus cares about them and wills good for them is indeed a matter of life and death. If this is a story about values, as all stories of discipleship might be described, as David Watson suggests, then finding our place in this story means asking ourselves what we truly value, and for what we would be willing to leave everything behind. What's the cloak we need to abandon? Who, or better, what is keeping us from reaching Jesus?
Walter Brueggemann's beautiful words on this text emphasize the theme of God's mercy, which did not begin with Jesus, although he calls Jesus "God's mercy among us." Instead, Brueggemann reminds us that this "wave of mercy" in Jesus continues the movement of God's mercy and grace as we have heard it told in the Old Testament. Here, at the end of a long journey full of healing and teaching, at the edge of what is to come – suffering, death, and resurrection – we remember that the suffering and death of Jesus were "a continuing act of mercy. And those who received mercy are formed into a new community."
We have received mercy
That community would be us, in the church, a community of people who have received mercy and now have the opportunity, the responsibility, the call to extend mercy to all of God's children in need, to extend "that strange transformative reach from a center of strength to a center of need that changes everything and makes all things new." Mercy makes all the difference in the world, whether the world knows it or not, but still, the world, Brueggemann says, waits for this tender mercy, even as it "falls apart in greed and anger and anxiety" (Brueggemann's book Inscribing the Text: Sermons and Prayers of Walter Brueggemann, is a wonderful source of prayers and reflections).
Writers and thinkers can argue all they want about the existence of God (check out the bestseller list), but the naysayers themselves may be transformed by the mercy of God, a mercy extended by those who have already received it themselves, extended and shared and multiplied right before their own eyes, our own eyes, a miracle, a great wonder to behold. Will our hearts be open to see?
A preaching version of this commentary (with book titles) can be found at www.ucc.org/worship/samuel.
The Rev. Kathryn Matthews (Huey) serves as dean of Amistad Chapel at the national offices of the United Church of Christ in Cleveland, Ohio (https://www.facebook.com/AmistadChapel).
You're invited to share your reflections on this text on our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/SermonSeeds.
For further reflection
Mark Twain, 19th century
"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus."
Antoine de Saint Exupery, 20th century
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly. What is essential is invisible to the eye."
Thomas Fuller, 17th century
"Seeing's believing, but feeling's the truth."
Tennessee Williams, 20th century
"There are no 'good' or 'bad' people. Some are a little better or a little worse, but all are activated more by misunderstanding than malice. A blindness to what is going on in each other's hearts...nobody sees anybody truly but all through the flaws of their own egos. That is the way we all see ...each other in life."
C.S. Lewis, 20th century
"I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else."
Helen Keller, 20th century
"The only thing worse than being blind is having sight but no vision."
Sebastian Barry, 21st century
"Because it strikes me there is something greater than judgement. I think it is called mercy."
Plato, 4th century
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a harder battle."
Stephen Levine, A Year to Live: How to Live This Year as If It Were Your Last, 21st century
"If there is a single definition of healing it is to enter with mercy and awareness those pains, mental and physical, from which we have withdrawn in judgment and dismay."
Richard Rohr, 21st century
"We clergy became angry guards instead of happy guides, low level policemen instead of proclaimers of a Great Gift and Surprise both perfectly hidden and perfectly revealed at the heart of all creation."

About Weekly Seeds
Weekly Seeds is a United Church of Christ resource for Bible study based on the readings of the "Lectionary," a plan for weekly Bible readings in public worship used in Protestant, Anglican and Roman Catholic churches throughout the world. When we pray with and study the Bible using the Lectionary, we are praying and studying with millions of others.
You're welcome to use this resource in your congregation's Bible study groups.
Weekly Seeds is a service of Local Church Ministries of the United Church of Christ. Bible texts are from the New Revised Standard Version, © 1989 Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Prayer is from The Revised Common Lectionary ©1992 Consultation on Common Texts. Used by permission.

Monday, October 5, 2015

Power Position

Power Position

"Three times I appealed to the Lord about this, that it would leave me, but he said to me, 'My grace is sufficient for you, for power is made perfect in weakness.'" - 2 Corinthians 12:8-9

In the 80s, we had Al Franken as Stuart Smalley, and his daily affirmation: "I'm good enough, I'm strong enough, and Gosh darn it, people like me." Stuart Smalley was satire, but he articulated the cult of self-satisfied cheap grace that was widespread at the time.

In the 90s and Oughts, we had Dr. Phil, who regularly called people on the carpet for their behaviors, challenging them to understand how they might be responsible for the situation in which they found themselves. People were attracted to Dr. Phil because even though he could be direct to the point of pain, all those daily affirmations hadn't really done much for their bottom line.

And in the current decade we have Brené Brown, the Vulnerability Guru, she who said, "only when we are brave enough to explore the darkness will we discover the infinite power of our light."

Our Christian tradition offers us a hybrid of Dr. Phil and Brené Brown:  the ancient practice of confession, a chance to own up to our collaboration in our own calamities, to acknowledge our imperfection, and instead be co-conspirators with God in the changing of our lives.

The benefit of confession is that, by admitting our weaknesses, to our God and to ourselves, we come into our strength. My church goes one further: we also admit our sins and frailties publicly, and it has made our community juicy, vigorous and real.

The drinking problem, the marital tension, the rage issue, the untreated anxiety: each of these, brought out of the darkness, inevitably draws us into the Light. Vulnerability is the new strength, and taking responsibility is a power position—the ultimate power position.

Prayer

God, give me the courage to tell the truth to myself and one other person, today, so I can receive the gift of Your grace and power. Amen.
About the Author
Molly Baskette is lead pastor of the quirky, loveable and truth-telling First Church Somerville UCC in Somerville, MA. Read their personal testimonies in her latest book,

Why The Pope's Mention Of Thomas Merton Was More Controversial Than You Think

Why The Pope's Mention Of Thomas Merton Was More Controversial Than You Think

The Pope held up Thomas Merton as a model of faith but some American Bishops excised him from the catechism

WASHINGTON (RNS) At his speech before Congress on Thursday (Sept. 24), Pope Francis listed Trappist monk Thomas Merton as one of four exemplary Americans who provide wisdom for us today.
Out on the National Mall, thousands cheered when the pope named two other exemplary Americans: Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr. Fewer recognized Merton (or the fourth exemplar the pope mentioned, social activist Dorothy Day.)
The pope did not choose to hail anyone associated with the institutional Catholic Church as his models. Instead he chose a former president, a Protestant minister, a lay Catholic and a monk.
That monk was significant because 10 years ago, when the first national Catholic catechism for adults was published in the U.S., Merton’s name was omitted as not Catholic enough.
The editors had included Merton in an earlier draft. In fact, the opening chapter told the story of Merton’s conversion. The editors understood that Merton’s story was quintessentially American and that he was central to 20th-century American Catholicism.
At the time, however, two influential conservatives involved in drafting the catechism described Merton as a “‘lapsed monk’ who in his last days went ‘wandering in the East, seeking consolations, apparently, of non-Christian, Eastern spirituality … ”
They were appalled that anyone would hold Merton up as a model of faith, according to Deborah Halter’s 2005 National Catholic Reporter essay “Whose orthodoxy is it?”
When it was leaked that Merton was being excised from the new catechism, Catholics implored the bishops’ catechism committee to reverse its decision. Hundreds of letters flowed in. A petition was signed by 500 Catholic leaders.
The International Thomas Merton Society sent a letter to then-Bishop Donald Wuerl, chair of the committee charged with writing the catechism, and U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ president Bishop William Skylstad, saying they were “deeply disturbed” by the Merton exclusion.
“Merton,” they wrote, “has played a crucial role in the faith journeys of thousands upon thousands of Catholics (as well as other Christians and even non-Christians) both during his lifetime and since his death, and we believe his inclusion in the catechism can and should be a significant way to extend the powerful witness of his life and writings to a new audience.”
Now-Cardinal Wuerl — so prominent at the pope’s side this week in his current role as archbishop of Washington — stated that Merton was removed because young Catholics didn’t know who he was.
Even at the time, that was a weak excuse.
So the catechism was published with no mention of Merton.
And since then the popularity of Merton’s writings and spiritual wisdom has continued to grow.
His monastery in Kentucky is a place of pilgrimage for thousands each year. He is avidly read among the young as well as the old. He continues to provide opportunities for encounter and dialogue. The International Thomas Merton Society’s membership extends across the globe.
Yet the institutional church as it is embodied in diocesan bureaucracy and managerial bishops continues to shut doors rather than open them.
As recently as last week, the Northern California chapter of the International Thomas Merton Society attempted to host a talk by a Merton scholar and well-respected theologian on the topic of Merton’s interreligious dialogue. But the bishop asked the local Catholic Church to host it off-site.
What a missed opportunity.
When Francis chose to lift up Merton before the Congress as an exemplary Catholic American, he knew what he was doing.
“Merton was above all a man of prayer, a thinker who challenged the certitudes of his time and opened new horizons for souls and for the church. He was also a man of dialogue, a promoter of peace between peoples and religions,” the pope said.
It is time for the Catholic Church in America to restore Thomas Merton to his rightful place as an exemplar of Catholic faith within the genius of American democracy in our catechism, in our churches and in our body politic.
(Rose Marie Berger is a Catholic peace activist and poet. John Berger, her father, is chair of the Northern California chapter of the International Thomas Merton Society.)
  • 7
  • 32
  • 0
  • 0

    Why The Pope's Mention Of Thomas Merton Was More Controversial Than You Think

    The Pope held up Thomas Merton as a model of faith but some American Bishops excised him from the catechism

    WASHINGTON (RNS) At his speech before Congress on Thursday (Sept. 24), Pope Francis listed Trappist monk Thomas Merton as one of four exemplary Americans who provide wisdom for us today.
    Out on the National Mall, thousands cheered when the pope named two other exemplary Americans: Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr. Fewer recognized Merton (or the fourth exemplar the pope mentioned, social activist Dorothy Day.)
    The pope did not choose to hail anyone associated with the institutional Catholic Church as his models. Instead he chose a former president, a Protestant minister, a lay Catholic and a monk.
    That monk was significant because 10 years ago, when the first national Catholic catechism for adults was published in the U.S., Merton’s name was omitted as not Catholic enough.
    The editors had included Merton in an earlier draft. In fact, the opening chapter told the story of Merton’s conversion. The editors understood that Merton’s story was quintessentially American and that he was central to 20th-century American Catholicism.
    At the time, however, two influential conservatives involved in drafting the catechism described Merton as a “‘lapsed monk’ who in his last days went ‘wandering in the East, seeking consolations, apparently, of non-Christian, Eastern spirituality … ”
    They were appalled that anyone would hold Merton up as a model of faith, according to Deborah Halter’s 2005 National Catholic Reporter essay “Whose orthodoxy is it?”
    When it was leaked that Merton was being excised from the new catechism, Catholics implored the bishops’ catechism committee to reverse its decision. Hundreds of letters flowed in. A petition was signed by 500 Catholic leaders.
    The International Thomas Merton Society sent a letter to then-Bishop Donald Wuerl, chair of the committee charged with writing the catechism, and U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ president Bishop William Skylstad, saying they were “deeply disturbed” by the Merton exclusion.
    “Merton,” they wrote, “has played a crucial role in the faith journeys of thousands upon thousands of Catholics (as well as other Christians and even non-Christians) both during his lifetime and since his death, and we believe his inclusion in the catechism can and should be a significant way to extend the powerful witness of his life and writings to a new audience.”
    Now-Cardinal Wuerl — so prominent at the pope’s side this week in his current role as archbishop of Washington — stated that Merton was removed because young Catholics didn’t know who he was.
    Even at the time, that was a weak excuse.
    So the catechism was published with no mention of Merton.
    And since then the popularity of Merton’s writings and spiritual wisdom has continued to grow.
    His monastery in Kentucky is a place of pilgrimage for thousands each year. He is avidly read among the young as well as the old. He continues to provide opportunities for encounter and dialogue. The International Thomas Merton Society’s membership extends across the globe.
    Yet the institutional church as it is embodied in diocesan bureaucracy and managerial bishops continues to shut doors rather than open them.
    As recently as last week, the Northern California chapter of the International Thomas Merton Society attempted to host a talk by a Merton scholar and well-respected theologian on the topic of Merton’s interreligious dialogue. But the bishop asked the local Catholic Church to host it off-site.
    What a missed opportunity.
    When Francis chose to lift up Merton before the Congress as an exemplary Catholic American, he knew what he was doing.
    “Merton was above all a man of prayer, a thinker who challenged the certitudes of his time and opened new horizons for souls and for the church. He was also a man of dialogue, a promoter of peace between peoples and religions,” the pope said.
    It is time for the Catholic Church in America to restore Thomas Merton to his rightful place as an exemplar of Catholic faith within the genius of American democracy in our catechism, in our churches and in our body politic.
    (Rose Marie Berger is a Catholic peace activist and poet. John Berger, her father, is chair of the Northern California chapter of the International Thomas Merton Society.)
  • 7
  • 32
  • 0
  • 0

    Why The Pope's Mention Of Thomas Merton Was More Controversial Than You Think

    The Pope held up Thomas Merton as a model of faith but some American Bishops excised him from the catechism

    WASHINGTON (RNS) At his speech before Congress on Thursday (Sept. 24), Pope Francis listed Trappist monk Thomas Merton as one of four exemplary Americans who provide wisdom for us today.
    Out on the National Mall, thousands cheered when the pope named two other exemplary Americans: Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr. Fewer recognized Merton (or the fourth exemplar the pope mentioned, social activist Dorothy Day.)
    The pope did not choose to hail anyone associated with the institutional Catholic Church as his models. Instead he chose a former president, a Protestant minister, a lay Catholic and a monk.
    That monk was significant because 10 years ago, when the first national Catholic catechism for adults was published in the U.S., Merton’s name was omitted as not Catholic enough.
    The editors had included Merton in an earlier draft. In fact, the opening chapter told the story of Merton’s conversion. The editors understood that Merton’s story was quintessentially American and that he was central to 20th-century American Catholicism.
    At the time, however, two influential conservatives involved in drafting the catechism described Merton as a “‘lapsed monk’ who in his last days went ‘wandering in the East, seeking consolations, apparently, of non-Christian, Eastern spirituality … ”
    They were appalled that anyone would hold Merton up as a model of faith, according to Deborah Halter’s 2005 National Catholic Reporter essay “Whose orthodoxy is it?”
    When it was leaked that Merton was being excised from the new catechism, Catholics implored the bishops’ catechism committee to reverse its decision. Hundreds of letters flowed in. A petition was signed by 500 Catholic leaders.
    The International Thomas Merton Society sent a letter to then-Bishop Donald Wuerl, chair of the committee charged with writing the catechism, and U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ president Bishop William Skylstad, saying they were “deeply disturbed” by the Merton exclusion.
    “Merton,” they wrote, “has played a crucial role in the faith journeys of thousands upon thousands of Catholics (as well as other Christians and even non-Christians) both during his lifetime and since his death, and we believe his inclusion in the catechism can and should be a significant way to extend the powerful witness of his life and writings to a new audience.”
    Now-Cardinal Wuerl — so prominent at the pope’s side this week in his current role as archbishop of Washington — stated that Merton was removed because young Catholics didn’t know who he was.
    Even at the time, that was a weak excuse.
    So the catechism was published with no mention of Merton.
    And since then the popularity of Merton’s writings and spiritual wisdom has continued to grow.
    His monastery in Kentucky is a place of pilgrimage for thousands each year. He is avidly read among the young as well as the old. He continues to provide opportunities for encounter and dialogue. The International Thomas Merton Society’s membership extends across the globe.
    Yet the institutional church as it is embodied in diocesan bureaucracy and managerial bishops continues to shut doors rather than open them.
    As recently as last week, the Northern California chapter of the International Thomas Merton Society attempted to host a talk by a Merton scholar and well-respected theologian on the topic of Merton’s interreligious dialogue. But the bishop asked the local Catholic Church to host it off-site.
    What a missed opportunity.
    When Francis chose to lift up Merton before the Congress as an exemplary Catholic American, he knew what he was doing.
    “Merton was above all a man of prayer, a thinker who challenged the certitudes of his time and opened new horizons for souls and for the church. He was also a man of dialogue, a promoter of peace between peoples and religions,” the pope said.
    It is time for the Catholic Church in America to restore Thomas Merton to his rightful place as an exemplar of Catholic faith within the genius of American democracy in our catechism, in our churches and in our body politic.
    (Rose Marie Berger is a Catholic peace activist and poet. John Berger, her father, is chair of the Northern California chapter of the International Thomas Merton Society.)

    Our Thoughts and Prayers Are Not Enough


    Our Thoughts and Prayers Are Not Enough

    Rev. Winnie Varghese Priest, Trinity Church, New York City
    Another mass shooting, this time at a community college in Oregon.
    It is long past time for gun reform. Get in your pulpit. Go knock on a door. It is time, and it is up to us.
    As religious people, most of us know what to do when confronted with a disaster. We take up donations. We show up. We bring our duct tape, casseroles, tissues, and spare coats. We will rush into your disaster with you and pray for you while you rebuild.
    Let's not let mass shootings become defined as natural disasters in our time, inevitable, unpredictable events that we can do little about but prepare to respond.
    As people called in to respond to disasters, we should be careful. It is nice to feel useful, even nicer to feel desperately needed. Disaster relief is apolitical, a safe outreach project. Faith communities don't usually want to generate conflict among themselves or with their neighbors. We prefer to be heroes, and some of us can even arrange to get paid to do it. It is tempting to adapt to this kind of tragedy as our new normal.
    We should be careful that we are not becoming invested in a new role as mass shooting chaplains as we are called to pray over the dead and offer the legitimacy of our faith communities to politicians who support the NRA, as they mourn the latest result of their actions. We can lament the tragic loss of young life, but we must also organize so that we are not doing this again, ever.
    It is a direct result of the laws of this country that we have mass shootings. It is not a complicated thing. Here's what the president has to say about it.
    It is hard to stand up for gun control in every state in this nation, but faith is hard. One of the roles of religious communities is to hold a vision of justice larger than might be politically reasonable, a vision worthy of the Creator.
    Dry your eyes. Call your legislators. Meet with your faith communities. Support your local gun control movements. Let's end this in our lifetime.

    Friday, October 2, 2015

    What Must I Do?


    What Must I Do?
    October 11, 2015
    Written by Kathryn Matthews (Huey)
    Sunday, October 11
    Twentieth Sunday after Pentecost
    Focus Theme
    What Must I Do?
    Weekly Prayer
    God, you promise never to forsake us, but to bring us to life, nurture us with your presence, and sustain us even in the hour of death. Meet us in our deepest doubts when we feel abandoned, drowning in our fear of your absence. Visit us in the tension between our yearning and our anger, that we may know your mercy and grace in our time of need. Amen.
    Focus Scripture
    Mark 10:17-31
    As he was setting out on a journey, a man ran up and knelt before him, and asked him, "Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?" Jesus said to him, "Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone. You know the commandments: 'You shall not murder; You shall not commit adultery; You shall not steal; You shall not bear false witness; You shall not defraud; Honor your father and mother.'" He said to him, "Teacher, I have kept all these since my youth." Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said, "You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me." When he heard this, he was shocked and went away grieving, for he had many possessions.

    Then Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, "How hard it will be for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God!" And the disciples were perplexed at these words. But Jesus said to them again, "Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God." They were greatly astounded and said to one another, "Then who can be saved?" Jesus looked at them and said, "For mortals it is impossible, but not for God; for God all things are possible."

    Peter began to say to him, "Look, we have left everything and followed you." Jesus said, "Truly I tell you, there is no one who has left house or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields, for my sake and for the sake of the good news, who will not receive a hundredfold now in this age—-houses, brothers and sisters, mothers and children, and fields, with persecutions—-and in the age to come eternal life. But many who are first will be last, and the last will be first."
    All Readings For This Sunday
    Job 23:1-9, 16-17
    Psalm 22:1-15
    Hebrews 4:12-16
    Mark 10:17-31
    Focus Questions
    1. What do you think brought the rich man to Jesus?
    2. What is the relationship between discipleship and wealth?
    3. Do we have to "do something" to be saved?
    4. Who are the insiders and the outsiders in this story, and does it matter?
    5. How do you imagine the rich man's life after his conversation with Jesus?
    Reflection by Kate Matthews (Huey)
    In Franco Zeffirelli's beautiful film, "Brother Sun, Sister Moon," the turning point in the story comes when Francis of Assisi, born and raised in a wealthy and privileged (and religiously observant) family, stands before the entire town, including the local bishop and his parents, strips off his clothes, and walks off into the mountains to live among the poor as a beggar. Francis is responding to a call that has troubled him since he returned, ill with fever, from the adventure of fighting in a war between petty nobles. His life before the war no longer makes sense to him, and he feels his soul being pulled toward a different way of living, a radical giving up of everything that would have been easily his, a turning away from the comfortable path that has been laid out before him. Francis was not just ill; he was hungry and thirsty and lost. His conversion experience came in the midst of suffering and uncertainty.
    The rich man in this week's passage from Mark does not appear to be similarly afflicted, although he too is apparently nagged by a deep inner sense that something isn't quite right, not quite complete, about his life. This is no adversary questioning Jesus; the religious authorities aren't in the scene, expressing their opinions or trying to trap Jesus. In a way, perhaps, they're present implicitly in the man's claim to have always followed the commandments. He's taken their advice, their teaching, to heart. I used to think this man was arrogant because he so easily claimed to have followed all the commandments since childhood. Where was his humility? And who can possibly follow all the commandments and not make a few major mistakes along the way? But that's not the point: rather, this man is saying that he has done what was expected of him as a faithful and observant Jew, and that is a good thing. And yet, he still struggles with a deep hunger that tells him that there is even more to life than just doing what is expected of him.
    The Law as gift, and then the next step
    The laws of any (true) religion are a gift, a path laid out for us, a set of guideposts when we're not sure of the way. Jesus, in his response, isn't quoting a law or laying a mandate on this man. He is opening a door to the next stage, the next step, on this man's journey of faith. Again, Zeffirelli provides a magnificent visual for this kind of experience, as Francis walks away from the town and out toward the countryside and the mountains. There is so much more ahead for him, not all of it pleasant or easy, and yet so rich and so full of power. When the church was at a particularly low time in terms of integrity in its practice, when wealth and worldly power had led it away from its primary focus, Francis was the breath of fresh air who led to a time of renewal and rediscovery of the church's basic call to faithfulness. "Rebuild my church, Francis," was the call he heard, and while he labored with stone to (literally) rebuild the crumbled sanctuary of San Damiano, his passionate response to the call to give everything away and follow Jesus was an inspiration that renewed the whole church.
    Today we might call the rich man in Mark's story, our Gospel passage, a seeker, although we assume that most seekers have not necessarily been paying much attention to religious laws and requirements. In fact, we think of seekers as "unchurched," and we may be tempted to think that we need to teach them how to live as faithful disciples of Jesus. But what if there are many seekers already in our congregations? What if there are many people in our pews, and even among our church leaders, who sense that there is something "more," and just doing what's expected of them isn't enough? What if, even within the church, we are still hungering for grace? What if church-going Christians still feel a deep need for transformation in their lives?
    Lessons for every culture and every time
    Of course, it's always risky to move between two very different economic and cultural settings, and it's important to acknowledge the differences between the time of Jesus and our own. However, there are certainly lessons here for us. Dianne Bergant notes that Jesus includes a commandment ("do not defraud") in his list that isn't in the Ten Commandments we know so well. Perhaps this is especially significant because it emphasizes that this man has gotten his wealth in ways that are proper and not "ill-gained."
    However, David Watson argues that in a world where there were only two classes, the super-rich and the impoverished, those who had wealth enjoyed it at the expense of those who went without. Watson sees the rich man as benefitting, intentionally or not, from the suffering of others, and this suffering deeply wounded, and continues to wound, the heart of God. We know that care of the poor and a just sharing of resources is at the heart of the prophets' proclamations throughout the Hebrew Scriptures, and yet we so easily slip into the same assumptions about wealth and possessions being a sign of God's favor that our ancestors held. Watson, then, claims that the rich man must make amends for the way his wealth has come at the expense of others. And that lesson is still applicable today, even in very different economic and cultural conditions, because those who enjoy an excess of material things surely have a responsibility toward the millions of people who go hungry and homeless.
    A difficult passage, and not just for camels
    Readers of this Gospel story have tried to work with its difficult teaching in a way that makes it more palatable. If the "eye of the needle" (in the wall of the city) is reduced to an uncomfortable maneuver by a camel (as I was taught), "getting into" the kingdom of God (or heaven, as I was taught) may be difficult but certainly not impossible. We'll just have to work a little harder at it (spiritual over-achievers will surely succeed?); it's easy to miss the part about God making seemingly impossible things possible. Is it any wonder that we have so little understanding of grace?
    Many writers on this text describe our possessions as things that can possess us, or provide security, or distract us from God. Charles Cousar recognizes that this is true not just of money but of everything that possesses, or perhaps consumes, us and our "ultimate concern," including "ambition, education, religion and the like." But Cousar cautions us from shying away from a focus on material things, because they hold such power in our lives, and in the eyes and workings of the world. He reminds us that the followers of Jesus live in "a critical tension" with the world in which we minister and strive to live faithfully, a world that values wealth and power and may find the gospel most offensive. And yet, Cousar writes, this same world "needs the constant reminder that the first will be last and the last first."
    Jesus spoke with love
    When the rich man waits for Jesus' answer to his question, he receives a response that is unusual in the Gospels, one of the most beautiful lines in Scripture: "Jesus, looking at him, loved him…" (10:21). Fred Craddock writes, "The man asked a big question and he got a big answer; small answers to ultimate questions are insulting." Craddock's insightful use of the word "ultimate" suggests that this is no complex or nuanced or obscure teaching for specialists in theology. This is the big question, the heart of the matter, the path for us to follow. Its simplicity, however, does not make it any easier to swallow, for the rich man or for us, his descendants in faith today.
    Perhaps that is why the story is particularly poignant, because Jesus does not deliver this instruction in a way that is harsh or oppressive. As he looks tenderly at the man, seeing into his heart and knowing him at his deepest level, we sense that his teaching is meant to free the man from everything that holds him bound, all the possessions that possess him. Megan McKenna sees the teaching as both an invitation into "the inner circles of his family" and a challenge to do the difficult thing that will restore his relationship to those on the margins of his life, those most in need of justice and generosity. Jesus asks us that same question today, in a time when many have too much and too many have not enough. What is our response to the invitation of Jesus?
    Outsiders and insiders
    We have been accompanying Jesus on his way to Jerusalem as he encounters and engages the religious "insiders" who come up short each time, missing the main point and often going away angry, even plotting to kill Jesus. Or perhaps the insiders are Jesus' own followers, who also miss the point and fail to grasp who Jesus is and what he is about. The Syrophoenician woman, for example, a pagan woman, of all people, could see the power of Jesus and the heart of his mission more clearly than the disciples could. (They were too busy fretting over the feeding of crowds and the nuisance of children.)
    However, Andre Resner, Jr. observes that this story is different from those accounts. Here the insiders get it, and the outsider who appears to have it all together is the one who misses the mark. This time, for once, the disciples get it right, and have left everything behind to follow Jesus. Instead of frustration, Jesus' words to the disciples are full of promise and reassurance that they will receive an abundance of good things in return. Resner observes that Jesus "draws a line in the sand" for this man, because this is a matter of ultimate concern for him, and for everyone who is too comfortable, in any age. However, it's not about getting to heaven but living the abundant life now: "Take care of where your heart, where your life, is now."
    What do we most need?
    Paul Wadell wrote a lovely reflection on this text in the October 6, 2009, issue of The Christian Century. He focuses on our hearts, and the "perplexing mysteries" within that make us "most afraid of what we most need." This man, Wadell writes, runs to Jesus, illustrating the urgency of his quest. He is restless, and unsatisfied, and in spite of his riches, he is needy, for he stands in need of what matters most, the thing that he can't count or accumulate or achieve or take credit for. And yet the treasure he needs and hungers for is the one thing that matters most, the one thing that is secure in this life: God's grace.
    Along with the line about Jesus looking at the man and loving him is the poignant account of his walking away "grieving, for he had many possessions." Wadell observes that the young man knows in his heart that Jesus is right, and that makes him sad and grieving as he walks back to what he has not found satisfying all along. However, Wadell claims that "Love is a way of seeing, and those who love us best see us best," so "Jesus sees him as he truly is, but in a way that the young man is not yet capable of seeing himself." Perhaps, in the days that followed, the man re-thought his decision, just as we might re-think our own lives, and listen to that same call to come, follow Jesus. Will we respond with joy, or will we walk away, grieving?
    A preaching version of this commentary (with book titles) can be found at www.ucc.org/worship/samuel.
    The Rev. Kathryn Matthews (Huey) serves as dean of Amistad Chapel at the national offices of the United Church of Christ in Cleveland, Ohio (https://www.facebook.com/AmistadChapel).
    You're invited to share your reflections on this text on our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/SermonSeeds.
    For further reflection
    Oscar Wilde, 19th century
    "Ordinary riches can be stolen, real riches cannot. In your soul are infinitely precious things that cannot be taken from you."
    Ernest Hemingway, 20th century
    "Fear of death increases in exact proportion to increase in wealth."
    Princess Diana, 20th century
    "They say it is better to be poor and happy than rich and miserable, but how about a compromise like moderately rich and just moody?"
    Ernesto Tinajero, 21st century
    "If you read the Bible and it does not challenge you, then you are reading yourself and not the Bible."
    Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 19th century
    "Things which matter most must never be at the mercy of things which matter least."
    Daisy Goodwin, 21st century
    "[A]nyone can acquire wealth, the real art is giving it away."

    About Weekly Seeds
    Weekly Seeds is a United Church of Christ resource for Bible study based on the readings of the "Lectionary," a plan for weekly Bible readings in public worship used in Protestant, Anglican and Roman Catholic churches throughout the world. When we pray with and study the Bible using the Lectionary, we are praying and studying with millions of others.
    You're welcome to use this resource in your congregation's Bible study groups.
    Weekly Seeds is a service of Local Church Ministries of the United Church of Christ. Bible texts are from the New Revised Standard Version, © 1989 Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Prayer is from The Revised Common Lectionary ©1992 Consultation on Common Texts. Used by permission.

    Saturday, September 26, 2015

    Enfolding Love

    Enfolding Love
    Sunday, October 4
    Nineteenth Sunday after Pentecost
    Focus Theme
    Enfolding Love
    Weekly Prayer
    Sovereign God, you make us for each other, to live in loving community as friends, sons and daughters, sisters and brothers, wives and husbands, partners and companions. Teach us to choose love when it is committed and devoted; teach us like little children to wonder and to trust, that our loving may reflect the image of Christ. Amen.
    Focus Scripture
    Mark 10:2-16
    Some Pharisees came, and to test him they asked, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?" He answered them, "What did Moses command you?" They said, "Moses allowed a man to write a certificate of dismissal and to divorce her." But Jesus said to them, "Because of your hardness of heart he wrote this commandment for you. But from the beginning of creation, 'God made them male and female.' 'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.' So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate."
    Then in the house the disciples asked him again about this matter. He said to them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her; and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery."
    People were bringing little children to him in order that he might touch them; and the disciples spoke sternly to them. But when Jesus saw this, he was indignant and said to them, "Let the little children come to me; do not stop them; for it is to such as these that the kingdom of God belongs. Truly I tell you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God as a little child will never enter it." And he took them up in his arms, laid his hands on them, and blessed them.
    All readings for this Sunday
    Job 1:1; 2:1-10
    Psalm 26
    Hebrews 1:1-4; 2:5-12
    Mark 10:2-16
    Focus Questions
    1. How can the church hold up the ideal of marriage without inflicting further pain on those who are divorced?
    2. Would you rather skip reading this passage from the Bible? If so, how do you decide which ones to skip?
    3. How is marriage a justice issue?
    4. Do you believe that some bonds can't be broken, even by divorce?
    5. Why do you think the reign of God belongs to the children? What do you think Jesus meant by "receiving the kingdom as a little child"?
    Reflection by Kate Matthews (Huey)
    We might be tempted to avoid the reading from Mark's Gospel this week, and choose instead to reflect with Job on why the good suffer, which may appear at first to be an easier problem than how to approach this passage about divorce. It's hard to imagine a family or a congregation today that doesn't include a number of people who have come through the painful experience of divorce (as spouses who have divorced, or as their children), and the possibility of hurting them is good reason to choose another text from the lectionary offerings for our reflection this week. However, we might also explore the question of whether it's possible to read this text for a meaning that is sensitive to the experience of those who have been divorced, and yet also appropriately challenging to our culture's attitudes and practices around relationships, especially marriage. An unexpected benefit might be a deeper commitment to wrestling with, rather than avoiding, difficult passages that require more time, more thought, and perhaps more movement of our hearts. Jesus, after all, was known to ask us for all three of these: our time, our thoughts, our hearts--our whole lives.
    In any case, the focus text has been given to us, and it is the story of Jesus responding to another trap laid by the religious authorities. As we struggle with Jesus' surprisingly hard words about divorce and remarriage, let's keep in mind that last week's lectionary text from Mark 9:38-50 speaks about cutting off our hand or foot, or tearing out our eye, if it makes us "stumble." If that's not enough, next week's passage, which in the Gospel of Mark immediately follows this week's text, tells the story of the rich man who thought he had "all his ducks in a row," having obeyed all the laws since his youth. Instead of hearing that he had sealed the deal on eternal life, he's told by Jesus to sell everything he owned and give the money to the poor, and come, follow him. Shock and grief weren't only his reaction; the disciples too were taken aback, and asked, "Then who can be saved?" (10:26). On his way to Jerusalem, to his suffering and death, Jesus speaks hard words to his followers, but he promises that "for God all things are possible" (10:27).
    The challenge before us is not unlike that presented by passages about money and possessions, for example, in a congregation that includes people who are struggling mightily with finances (and no one knows it), sitting right beside others who need to hear a word that will jar them out of complacency about their consumption of material things, or their dependence not on God but on money, or their lack of generosity toward those in need, or their failure to support God's mission in the church. (It's probably more fair to say "our" rather than "their" in that sentence.) And this doesn't even begin to address the question of economic injustice in our systems and institutions, a debate that rages now among North American Christians who would rather avoid many, many passages in the Bible that make most of us feel quite uncomfortable. And yet, wouldn't Jesus have something to say about all of these things, even if he does so lovingly? After all, we'll hear next week that Jesus looked at the rich man "and loved him" as he encouraged him to do the very thing the man felt he could not do.
    Divorce and remarriage?
    The preoccupation of churches with questions around sexuality dominates our debates about morality, and yet divorce and remarriage appear to be settled issues for most mainline (and members of many other) churches, even though Jesus speaks quite clearly here and in the Gospel of Matthew (19:1-12) against divorce and remarriage. It may very well be that the improved economic and social status of women in our culture has contributed to a higher rate of divorce, as more women, for example, are able to leave abusive marriages. A growing number of religious leaders grasp the reality of harmful relationships that ought to end, and fewer women, we trust, are hearing from their pastors, "What did you do to make him hit you?" While marriage is no longer as much a question of property transfer as it was in ancient times (women, of course, were part of the property), there are many important financial and other issues that require a legal agreement in order to end a marital relationship. Like our ancient ancestors in faith, we appear to have made reluctant peace with the sad necessity of divorce, and have shown compassion and understanding for those who seek to marry again.
    So what do we do with all of this, as we shine the light of this Gospel text on the attitude of our culture and our church toward divorce? Can it be that the secular culture around us is somehow more compassionate than the gospel, giving victims a chance to escape unbearable situations, or those who feel that they are dying in relationships that starve their souls a chance to enter into a life-giving, grace-filled second marriage? These are thorny questions, but not ones to be avoided.
    Scripture in conversation with Scripture
    A little background is helpful in understanding what is happening here, on the road to Jerusalem, when the crowds gather and the religious leaders try to set Jesus up with a trick question. His answer, one way or the other, will offend the faction that doesn't agree with him. Although it seems that divorce itself was a given, some teachers allowed it under more conditions than others. We have to go back to Deuteronomy 24:1-4 to understand where the Pharisees are coming from when they ask Jesus whether it's lawful for a man to divorce his wife. When he asks them what Moses said (that is, the Law), they quote from Deuteronomy, and we might wonder why they even ask, if it's right there in the Law. Or are they asking for Jesus' interpretation of the text, which is where religious people start disagreeing, back then just like today?
    If we read that Deuteronomy text, we're immediately struck by the marked difference between a patriarchal culture thousands of years ago and the one we live in today, where women are rarely if ever referred to as "defiled," and it's not acceptable for a man simply to get rid of a wife if "he finds something objectionable about her" (24:1-2). Jesus acknowledges that the Mosaic Law permitted divorce, but only because of the "hardness of heart" of the people. But he then puts Scripture in conversation with Scripture, holding up the ideal of God's intention so beautifully expressed in Genesis, for two people to be faithful, lifelong companions in an intimate, committed relationship that should not be severed. As many commentators observe, the Pharisees ask about divorce and Jesus changes the subject to marriage instead. John and James Carroll write, "Jesus deflects concern from escape clauses to an embracing of the unity of partners that reflects the creative design of God."
    Bonds not easily broken
    That's the public part of the conversation. Later, in private, "in the house," that is, when it's just Jesus and his followers, he expands on the Law, calling remarriage "adultery." We know that "in the house" is the way Mark records the conversation that was going on in the early church. That observation is confirmed here when Mark has Jesus speaking of something that wasn't practiced in ancient Judaism, a wife divorcing her husband. Mark's church is wrestling with the Greco-Roman culture around them which allowed such things, and that debate is reflected in the way they "record" Jesus' private conversation.
    A Bible study provides an excellent opportunity for discussion of the many interesting approaches to this text, and the small but important points that might inform our perspective. For example, Lamar Williamson, Jr. notes that the words "against her" in the text suggest that these were personal rather than legal matters that are important even after the marriage ends; Williamson focuses with keen insight on the bonds that can persist between two people who have been one and then separate. In a society like ours that permits divorce and remarriage, we might acknowledge that these bonds are not always easily or completely broken, despite all the legal agreements we might create. Other scholars remind us that Paul himself re-stated the prohibition against divorce, but added a dispensation that endures in some churches to this day.
    Jesus as law-giver?
    Jesus is asked a legal question, a technical, down-to-earth, question about everyday, lived reality, and he answers with an ideal that is, to be honest, almost impossible to achieve, at least by everyone. As we have said, Jesus has been known to speak this way before, and he will again. But John and James Carroll wonder if it's appropriate to see Jesus as laying such a heavy burden on his followers, including the death penalty that Leviticus 20:10 prescribes for adultery. Or could this be Jesus once again exaggerating in order "to challenge beliefs and practices which we take for granted? A hard saying to be taken seriously, but not to be pressed literally"? In our hearts, we sense that Jesus was not about ordering people to be put to death because they had disobeyed the Law, even if the Law seems to call for it. What then is the lesson here? What do we hear in this passage?
    At first, it might sound too easy just to say that Jesus was holding up the ideal of marriage in response to the Pharisees' preoccupation with divorce. But isn't that exactly what needs to happen in our own time: don't we need strong voices that lift up the ideal, the intention of God from the very beginning, of two people joined together for life, faithfully loving each other? It didn't take long (in Genesis itself) for things to change, and for men (revered patriarchs included) to start collecting multiple wives, with no word of judgment from the Scripture. Yes, divorce came along, too, because of "hardness of heart," a mysterious phrase that might bear reflection. As in every subject he addressed, Jesus seems to wrench our attention from the technicalities to the heart of the matter.
    There are ways for us in the church to focus more energy on the ideal of lasting, faithful, loving unions that are a sign of God's love in the world. We could strengthen our support systems for married couples and our marriage preparation programs, and perhaps even consider a measure of holy hesitation before marrying every couple that asks. In some cases, it might require an extraordinary degree of courage on the part of a pastor to decline to marry a couple he or she knows is not ready for marriage. Are we even spending time in the church wrestling with how quickly pastors agree to preside at weddings that perhaps should never occur? Or are we spending too much time thinking about other ways to "defend" marriage?
    Marriage as sacramental encounter with God
    Is it possible, in the life of the church, to speak about marriage in encouraging and hopeful ways that also affirm those who have had to leave a marriage in order to seek wholeness and healing? If salvation is about healing and wholeness, then the possibility of remarriage seems not only a matter of compassion but a question of justice. James J. Thompson suggests that it's a matter of "whether the human was created for marriage, or marriage for the human?" Richard Swanson has also written evocatively of marriage "as a field on which we encounter God....at the heart of human life," not "on the edges of existence, in retreat from ordinary life" so much as "in the midst of the ordinary rituals of daily life." In this sense, then, marriage is sacramental, a means of God's grace in our lives. Of all people, then, faithful followers of Jesus should take marriage seriously, and should hesitate before denying anyone this means of encountering God.
    Speaking of grace: the second part of the passage may seem at first disconnected from the first, when Jesus once again uses children as an illustration of how to receive the reign of God. We remember that only a few verses earlier Jesus urged his disciples to become the servant of all, and to receive even little children, who had no standing in the world, as they would receive him (9:36-37). In this week's story, we picture parents bringing their children for a blessing; children may not have had status or power in that culture, but these parents obviously loved their own. Maybe the scene was chaotic, or maybe the disciples were in a bad mood after the divorce discussion. They "spoke sternly" to the parents, and/or the children, probably figuring that Jesus had more important business to tend. That's the moment that Jesus chooses to enlighten them once more; like us, they seem to need that a lot. Douglas Hare contrasts the innocent openness of the little children with the striving of the adult disciples and religious leaders: the "lowly" children receive God's reign as the unearned, "pure gift" of God's grace, while grown-ups need to "submit themselves humbly to God's sovereign grace."
    The bigger question of how we read the Bible
    "Struggling with Scripture" is a little book of speeches by several great Bible scholars who help us approach difficult texts such as this one from Mark. In his introduction, William Sloane Coffin reassures us that our struggle with a text like this one reflects "religious faithfulness"; after all, what is more important than the Bible? Walter Brueggemann calls the Bible a "script" that respects our freedom but also "insist[s] that the world is not without God, not without the holy gift of life rooted in love." We don't make moral decisions apart from God, and God's grace. William Placher claims that religious practices that reject people and limit God's grace, "rather than marvel at its superabundance," contradict the way of Jesus.
    And Brian K. Blount reflects on listening for guidance from the Stillspeaking God; he challenges the church today in a way that might shock many contemporary Christians, when he says that, instead of conforming to a past culture, we should "speak to it! Speak from it, yes, but also speak to it in a way that values human living now, before God, just as human living before God was valued in the first century." Like slaves in the 19th century American South, and women, and the poor in Latin America, those who turn to the Bible in hope find that the Word of God liberates rather than oppresses in their own time; Blount writes that taking the Bible literally, on the other hand, "does a disservice to the power of the living Word to confront, challenge, and liberate us in the places where God's Holy Spirit of Christ meets us today." (Struggling with Scripture is a very helpful little book for students of the Bible.)
    A preaching version of this commentary (with book titles) can be found at www.ucc.org/worship/samuel.
    The Rev. Kathryn Matthews (Huey) serves as dean of Amistad Chapel at the national offices of the United Church of Christ in Cleveland, Ohio (https://www.facebook.com/AmistadChapel).
    You're invited to share your reflections on this text on our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/SermonSeeds.
    For further reflection
    Fyodor Dostoyevsky, The Brothers Karamazov, 19th century
    "Love children especially, for they too are sinless like the angels; they live to soften and purify our hearts and, as it were, to guide us."
    Karl Menninger, 20th century
    "Love cures people--both the ones who give it and the ones who receive it."
    Lily Tomlin, 21st century
    "If love is the answer, could you rephrase the question?"
    Joseph Campbell, 20th century
    "When people get married because they think it's a long-time love affair, they'll be divorced very soon, because all love affairs end in disappointment. But marriage is a recognition of a spiritual identity."
    Oscar Wilde, 19th century
    "The world has grown suspicious of anything that looks like a happily married life."
    Robert Anderson, 19th century
    "In every marriage more than a week old, there are grounds for divorce. The trick is to find and continue to find grounds for marriage."
    Audrey Hepburn, 20th century
    "If I get married, I want to be very married."
    About Weekly Seeds
    Weekly Seeds is a United Church of Christ resource for Bible study based on the readings of the "Lectionary," a plan for weekly Bible readings in public worship used in Protestant, Anglican and Roman Catholic churches throughout the world. When we pray with and study the Bible using the Lectionary, we are praying and studying with millions of others.
    You're welcome to use this resource in your congregation's Bible study groups.
    Weekly Seeds is a service of Local Church Ministries of the United Church of Christ. Bible texts are from the New Revised Standard Version, © 1989 Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Prayer is from The Revised Common Lectionary ©1992 Consultation on Common Texts. Used by permission.